The ban is primarily a ban on sales, and reads: “no person shall sell or distribute an electronic cigarette to a person in San Francisco.” E-cigarette sales are off limits inside San Francisco city limits, and that language applies both to brick-and-mortar retailers and to online shops, which cannot ship to recipients at a San Francisco address (though that provision seems oddly difficult to police).
San Francisco Becomes The First City To Officially Ban E-Cigarettes
Q: Can I shit in the streets of SanFran?
A: Yes.
Q: Can I smoke pot?
A: Yes, of course!
Q: Can I shoot heroin?
A: Not only yes, but we will exchange needles at taxpayers’ expense.
Q: Can I buy cigarettes?
A: Highly taxed, but yes. Please respect the No Smoking areas.
Q: Can I buy an E-Cig?
A: Are you insane? NO! That is harmful for your health! You must be a White Supremacist!
What if someone wants to vape cannabis?
That goes right up there with “what if I gave my AR-15 to an illegal before hiding him in my attic?”
Guess they are pissed at the loss of taxes on cigarettes. This city wants kids to get cancer.
“no person shall sell or distribute an electronic cigarette to a person in San Francisco.”
So … A Trump-voting, gun-owning white male can still buy one within city limits. (Since “those types” are deplorable non-person by SJW lights).
@It’s just Boris:
I was going to go with, “What if I give it to my buddy’s dog, who is trained to retrieve items for him? Since the dog is not a ‘person’, neither transfer is illegal.”
But some SJW would probably start complaining about how that’s “offensive to Canine-Americans!”
Maybe if I hand it to a human infant instead, since liberal states say they aren’t persons and don’t have rights….?
(For the record, I like yours better. 🙂 )
“Canine-American”
Nice. Likey.
A nurse with whom I used to work, referred to her dog as a “Labrador-American”.
Boris, I like your, as well. As a “Deplorable American”, I approve!