Spurious and Supriouser

The accusation against Judge Kavanaugh by Christine Blasey Ford, which started out on shaky ground has completely fallen apart.

She is 0 for 4 on corroborating witnesses.  The FBI has said it won’t investigate.  The Montgomery County Sheriff has offered to investigate, but so far no charges have been filed in the county.

Kavanaugh is set to present alibi documentation which the media and the internet has decided to completely tear apart.

The non stop cycle testify, won’t testify, negations on conditions to testify, push back the date of testimony, had further discredited her.

The Chicago Tribune and LA Times have both published OpEds criticizing the Democrats for this transparent farce.

So what are the Democrats going to do?  Exactly what they’ve been doing since 2012.  Push a bad thing even harder.

Ronan Farrow and The New Yorker have decided to take all the credibility they generated from the outing of Harvey Weinstein and burn it.

Senate Democrats Investigate a New Allegation of Sexual Misconduct, from Brett Kavanaugh’s College Years

The Democratic Senate offices reviewing the allegations believe that they merit further investigation. “This is another serious, credible, and disturbing allegation against Brett Kavanaugh. It should be fully investigated,” Senator Mazie Hirono, of Hawaii, said. An aide in one of the other Senate offices added, “These allegations seem credible, and we’re taking them very seriously. If established, they’re clearly disqualifying.”

Oh no, another woman as come froward.

The woman at the center of the story, Deborah Ramirez, who is fifty-three, attended Yale with Kavanaugh, where she studied sociology and psychology. Later, she spent years working for an organization that supports victims of domestic violence. The New Yorker contacted Ramirez after learning of her possible involvement in an incident involving Kavanaugh. The allegation was conveyed to Democratic senators by a civil-rights lawyer. For Ramirez, the sudden attention has been unwelcome, and prompted difficult choices. She was at first hesitant to speak publicly, partly because her memories contained gaps because she had been drinking at the time of the alleged incident. In her initial conversations with The New Yorker, she was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty. After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. Ramirez is now calling for the F.B.I. to investigate Kavanaugh’s role in the incident. “I would think an F.B.I. investigation would be warranted,” she said.

Oh, bullshit.  She’s a women’s/victim’s right activist.  She had to think hard about this for days.  She wants the FBI to investigate after the FBI said that it wouldn’t investigate the Ford claim because it was out of their jurisdiction and they had nothing to go by.

Ramirez said that, when both she and Kavanaugh were freshmen at Yale, she was invited by a friend on the women’s soccer team to a dorm-room party. She recalled that the party took place in a suite at Lawrance Hall, in the part of Yale known as Old Campus, and that a small group of students decided to play a drinking game together. “We were sitting in a circle,” she said. “People would pick who drank.” Ramirez was chosen repeatedly, she said, and quickly became inebriated. At one point, she said, a male student pointed a gag plastic penis in her direction. Later, she said, she was on the floor, foggy and slurring her words, as that male student and another stood nearby. (Ramirez identified the two male onlookers, but, at her request, The New Yorker is not naming them.)

A third male student then exposed himself to her. “I remember a penis being in front of my face,” she said. “I knew that’s not what I wanted, even in that state of mind.” She recalled remarking, “That’s not a real penis,” and the other students laughing at her confusion and taunting her, one encouraging her to “kiss it.” She said that she pushed the person away, touching it in the process. Ramirez, who was raised a devout Catholic, in Connecticut, said that she was shaken. “I wasn’t going to touch a penis until I was married,” she said. “I was embarrassed and ashamed and humiliated.” She remembers Kavanaugh standing to her right and laughing, pulling up his pants. “Brett was laughing,” she said. “I can still see his face, and his hips coming forward, like when you pull up your pants.” She recalled another male student shouting about the incident. “Somebody yelled down the hall, ‘Brett Kavanaugh just put his penis in Debbie’s face,’ ” she said. “It was his full name. I don’t think it was just ‘Brett.’ And I remember hearing and being mortified that this was out there.”

Just a reminder of a quote from another The New Yorker author, Dorthy Parker.

“If all the girls at Yale were laid end to end, I shouldn’t be surprised.”

This has gone from bullshit to horseshit.  She was totally wasted, but remembers hearing someone yell down the hall “Brett Kavanaugh?”  Did they yell out his birthday and social security number too?

Oh yeah, and there are no witnesses.  The people who would know about the party said Kavanaugh wasn’t there.  The one person who remotely corroborates her story heard it about it as third party hearsay.

A classmate of Ramirez’s, who declined to be identified because of the partisan battle over Kavanaugh’s nomination, said that another student told him about the incident either on the night of the party or in the next day or two. The classmate said that he is “one-hundred-per-cent sure” that he was told at the time that Kavanaugh was the student who exposed himself to Ramirez.

This is even more dubious than the Miranda Kind Facebook post.

“I was drunk, I don’t remember the face, but I do remember a name yelled out in an awkward way that doesn’t sound at all like how college kids talk, from over 30 years ago, and it took a week for me to even suss out that detail,” is a really bad story to run with.”

But it gets worse.

Michael Avenatti is the lawyer representing Stormy Daniels in her bizarre suit against Trump.  Representing a 40 year old porn star who apparently spent all the money she agreed to take for sex with Trump and is now trying to get more has turned him into a #Resistance hero.  So much so that this shaky con-artist of a lawyer wants to use his Stormy Daniels fame to run for President.

So now he’s representing a woman who claims to have also been assaulted by Kavanaugh.  Not just Kavanaugh but his buddy Judge too.

The letter is hard to read (view it large in Twitter) but he is alleging  that Kavanaugh and Judge were involved in gang rapes and three-ways.

That’s right.  The man that everyone who knows him says he’s a Eagle Scout, is really Caligula.  Also, this woman’s name and her specific claims have yet to be disclosed.

That any woman would hire Avenatti already discredits her story.  He’s a political hack, not a lawyer.  But this goes so far out of the bounds of reality that no sane person can believe it.

The Democrats have clearly weaponized baseless sexual assault claims.  This is now their go to tool to destroy reputations.

They want power so badly, they have destroyed the Senate, our judicial system, and the credibility of women to try and take it.

 

 

3 Replies to “Spurious and Supriouser”

  1. She remembers his full name being yelled down the hall, but didn’t remember it until a week ago. That’s some really opportunistic memory there.

  2. Ask any memory expert. The memories are not carved in stone, and they change from day to day. Eyewitness testimony is the weakest there is. Forensic evidence is far, far better. I call bullshit. The democrats don’t mind destroying the country. I hate them.

  3. I see what you did there:
    “Oh no, another woman as come froward.”

    fro·ward
    ˈfrō(w)ərd/
    adjective
    adjective: froward

    (of a person) difficult to deal with; contrary.

    Origin

Only one rule: Don't be a dick. Also, You can use html code to decorate your comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.