It’s horrific poison and mutilation done to children that ruins their bodies for life.
An article recently published in the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy charts the history of puberty blockers and shows how their use is based upon the scant evidence and how claims they are reversible and safe are “implausible.”
Dr Michael Biggs, author of the article titled “The Dutch Protocol for Juvenile Transsexuals: Origins and Evidence”, tells of how pediatric endocrinologists ignored concerns about the drugs’ impact on bone density, cognitive function, and the fact that almost all of the young people receiving treatment were homosexual and instead rushed ahead in prescribing the drugs.
In the US, adoption of the drugs’ usage was led by Norman Spack, who co-founded the first pediatric gender clinic in the US at Boston Children’s Hospital and who apparently “more than once recalled salivating at the prospect of treating patients” with the drugs, writes Biggs.
“On the side effects of puberty suppression, there is most evidence on bone density [which] was initially dismissed ‘of no great concern,'” Biggs explains. “The effects of puberty suppression on emotional and cognitive development are more difficult to ascertain, but more consequential as they could potentially affect the capacity to consent to cross-sex hormones and surgery.” He cites several studies in which IQ appears to drop after taking GnRHa drugs.
This is important given that every study to date shows that almost 100 percent of children who are put on blockers go on to consent to take cross-sex hormones.
“Even less is known about the effects of puberty suppression on sexual functioning. [Jazz] Jennings, who started on GnRHa at the age of 11, has no libido and cannot orgasm,” continues Biggs. “Jennings’ surgeon, Marci Bowers, who has performed over 2,000 vaginoplasties, acknowledges that ‘every single child … who was truly blocked at Tanner stage 2, has never experienced an orgasm.'”
Another issue observed with blocking puberty in male children was that “stopping sexual development meant the penis did not grow … [which] made it more likely that the orifice would need to be lined with a portion of the patient’s intestines rather than the inverted penis,” explains Biggs. In one cited study, out of 49 patients undergoing vaginoplasty after pubertal suppression, “71% required intestinal vaginoplasty,” a procedure which Biggs describes as “more invasive, requiring a second surgical site, and [entailing] greater risk of complications such as rectal fistula.”
So, the actual science shows that children given puberty blockers have bone density issues, a loss in IQ and cognitive function, fail to have any normal sexual development, and go on to have more invasive, dangerous, and risky surgeries.
And this is the big push in “trans medicine” to put kids on puberty blockers as young and as quickly as possible.
This is like a witch’s brew of the worst politically and ideologically motivated pseudo science of 20th Century Leftism, Lysenkoism, the mutilations by Josef Mengele, and ice pick lobotomies, all mixed together.
This is evil being done to children and the President of the United States wants to make sure it’s guaranteed to children.
This will not stop until we stop it.
It must be the law that any sort of chemical or surgical gender affirming treatment is a crime.
Ideally punishable with death, but at a very minimum life in prison.
I don’t give a shit about norms.
I want a politician to stand up and say “if you inject puberty blockers into a child we will inject sodium thiopental, pancuronium bromide, and potassium chloride into you.”