Not even Reed Richards would stretch and twist that far. I guess this being the first time a rapper is ever shot to death may have altered their common sense, right?
Hell, it was not even the first time for Young Dolph. He got shot in that other state with permitless carry called California.
OK, you can all stop laughing now.
If they did not lie, they wouldn’t be able to post anything.
I may be wrong, but I cannot recall a single rock’n’roll musician who ever got shot by a fellow musician… Okay, there was Kurt Cobain, but…
The untold, probable truth: The person who shot him is not allowed to carry a firearm, even under the new permit-less carry laws.
That’s probable enough that I’d bet money on it, if I were a betting man.
Why not? Because even in permit-less “Constitutional Carry” states, you have to legally possess a firearm in order to legally carry it.
In these “rapper shootings”, the shooter almost invariably has a criminal record a mile long, including crimes that would make him (it’s nearly always a male) a “prohibited person”.
The equation is so simple, even the math-challenged Bradys should be able to understand it: Not allowed to possess = Not allowed to carry.
Thus, the new permit-less carry law had f@#$-all to do with this death. It likely would have happened anyway.
But the Bradys are never ones to let facts get in the way of The Narrative [TM].
Who? (take your pick of subject)
He was shot in a sketchy part of town at a… cookie bakery.
Now, not saying it is, but there are several “businesses” here that are laundering fronts for drugs, and all of them are in sketchy areas.
So a rich n famous rapper going to a section 8 area for some cookies… sure. Why not.
I’m willing to be the cookies contained an extra special Totally Holistic Component.
Live by the rap “music” sword, die by that same sword. :::shrug:::