I’m not backing down from that.
This is an actual New York Times Tweet:
The 12 jury members and two alternates in the Derek Chauvin trial remain anonymous, and their faces can't be shown on camera. Here's what we do know about them. https://t.co/JKamadWEQP
— The New York Times (@nytimes) March 31, 2021
The article:
Who Are the Jurors in the Derek Chauvin Trial?
The jurors bring to the table a range of views about race and policing, some forged by long life experience and some formed after the death of George Floyd.
The jury is a demographic mix: three Black men, one Black woman, and two women who identified themselves as multiracial. There are two white men and four white women. They are urban and suburban, ranging in age from their 20s to their 60s. The two alternates are white women.
The jurors bring to the table a range of views about Mr. Chauvin, Mr. Floyd, race and policing, some forged by long life experience and some formed after the video of Mr. Floyd dying under Mr. Chauvin’s knee started a new civil rights movement.
And yet they remain invisible, unseen by all but the very few people allowed into the courtroom. Because of the many threats against people involved in the case and the potential for outside pressure, the 12 jury members and two alternates remain anonymous and their faces cannot be shown on camera.
Yes, because of the threats against them. Not just death but being canceled, and the threats that would naturally precipitate against their family.
That’s how this would go, you know it from how the Left behaves and has always behaved.
“Juror X voted to acquit, she’s a racist, her husband must be racist for marrying her, cancel her husband and her children too.”
When the Communist regimes of the 20th century took out an opponent, they took out their whole family. The agent of Pol Pot would bash the infant children of dissidents to death against a tree.
So rather than respect that, the NYT is on the side of the mob and gives details like the race, sex, and profession of the jurors. Details that could be used to identify them.
This is one of the most widely circulated papers in the world attempting to doxx jurors in one of the most heated trials in my lifetime.
This isn’t journalism. This is what the Klan used to do to intimidate jurors.
This is evil.
The public has a right to know only in certain circumstances…which seem to be fluid (like many of the Left’s definitions).
Hey, turnabout is fair play, so the NYT staff involved in this crap have to be doxed as well.
I’ve seen it successfully shut the pieholes of many local MSM’s “journalists,” in several occasions, when the lib rules they masturbate to are applied to them.
Next up, no more anonymous voting…
Yes. This is evil, but it’s what the NYT does best, from at least as early as the 1920’s.
Buckets of tar and bags of feathers for the lessor offenders. Gallows for the rest. Or do we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit?
It’s the only way to be sure.
The word is ‘Sippenhaft’, or ‘Guilty Blood’.
Since the American Left loves some National Socialist beliefs, they’re all abroad with that one too.
1-NYT-zero cred. Who cares
2-as for floyd. He got what he earned
He was a useless skin bag destined for zero.
Now, he has no troubles, he is good