[fbvideo link=”https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71/videos/10155264914736171/” width=”600″ height=”500″ onlyvideo=”1″]
Although the video is from formerly known as Great Britain, it applies here in the US too
Again we are seeing two conflicting set of rules being played: Our side believe in the discussion of all ideas and to battle in the arena of civil arguments. The other side wants to shut down anybody that expresses an idea they deem offensive and they are more than willing to use force to do so.
So what happens when our side decides: “Fine, we will play it your way. We will shut down anybody who is spouting ideas we don’t like by any means necessary.”
And our means may come with a 1 MOA or better.
>:(
Screw it. Let’s do it.
I grow weary of speculation, how about we set a date for direct action and start playing by their rules?
Assault. Theft. etc. Good thing people can rely on the police for protection.