At first, I thought it was pure trolling by some sock puppet.

But turns out she is a real person. Sanity however is questionable.

When you delude yourself to the point of mentally erasing hard facts such as physiology and the impossibility of men to naturally get pregnant, you are not espousing a Civil Rights issue but waving the flag of political madness and the need to create a pseudo reality to please your twisted little brain and the brains of those like you.

The old wives’ tale of getting pregnant by sitting in a public toilet seat holds more rationale that the deranged babbling above. More scientific too.

Spread the love

By Miguel.GFZ

Semi-retired like Vito Corleone before the heart attack. Consiglieri to J.Kb and AWA. I lived in a Gun Control Paradise: It sucked and got people killed. I do believe that Freedom scares the political elites.

12 thoughts on “This is what madness looks like: “it’s not only women who need abortions.””
  1. I for one am shocked that this Paragon of Leftist Insanity just acknowledged that Texans are people.

    Pregnant ones, at least. But it’s a start. 🙂

  2. Let’s say that I believe myself to be a gorilla. No matter how strongly I believe it, I am still not a gorilla.
    Let’s say that I take pills to make myself grow more hair to look more like a gorilla. I am still not a gorilla.
    If I hire a surgeon to perform an operation to make myself look more like a gorilla, I am still not a gorilla.
    If I get a million people to say that I can be whatever I identify myself as, and declare than I am a gorilla, I am still not a gorilla.
    If I were to believe myself to be a gorilla and took the steps above, people would say I am crazy.
    So how can a woman claiming to be a man be any different?
    Yes, I know that some people are born with more than one set of genitalia. Those people are genetic dead ends. Why? Because they are defective genetically and almost never produce offspring. There are only 11 reported cases of pregnancy in true hermaphrodites in all of human history, but none with advanced genetic testing. Saying that this shows “intersex” people (as the loons are wont to describe them) are proof that this is natural is ridiculous. It is akin to claiming that a child born without arms is actually a snake.

    1. Have their been any transsexuals that had their male genitals cut off and a donor’s uterus ovaries transplanted in?

      I’d think that would make news.

      If a male had someone else’s female genitalia transplanted, and didn’t die from transplant rejection, it would be amazing if they successfully became pregnant. But the uterus and all the “accessories”, those would all be genetically female, XX chromosomes like the donor. They’d have the donor’s genome.

      One could think of it as a female being hosted in a male body.

  3. Having a tough time wrapping my mind around this. But, I think I may have hit upon the logic these idiots are using.

    Gender is just a name to them.

    No different than Bob, Dorothy, or Emilia. Just a name. Substitute a name for the pronoun woman or man, and their sentences make a certain amount of sense.

    “Women and girls are not the only people who can get pregnant” makes sense if it is written as “Leslie and Stacey are not the only people who can get pregnant.”

    What is disturbing is they really, actually believe that gender is nothing more than a name.

    1. It’s right up there with “2+2 = 4 is just an opinion promoted by dead white males”.

      My response to that sort of thing is: do you think gravity is just an opinion, too? If yes, step up to the edge of this skyscraper roof. Now step forward. We’ll see about your opinions…

      1. The idiots playing the “2+2 doesn’t always equal 4” reach their “conclusion” by positing systems where the symbols have different definitions. It’s pseudo-intellectualism; it’s someone trying to sound smart by making something overly complicated.

        Truly brilliant people can CLARIFY complicated concepts. Pseudo intellectuals OBFUSCATE simple concepts to make themselves feel smarter.

        1. @Rob: That’s what I’ve been saying. “2 plus 2 equals 4” assumes we’re adding like objects/terms. Always has. Two apples plus two apples equals four apples. Two apples plus two peaches equals four fruit. We focus on what each group has in common or it doesn’t make sense.

          When they change it up to make two and two equal something else, they’re usually substituting non-like objects/terms.

          “If I have two apples and add two peaches, how many rutabaga do I have?” It’s a nonsensical question — apples and peaches are not rutabaga — but the pseudo-intellectual would proudly proclaim, “See? Two plus two equals zero!”

          It’s dishonest and deliberately confusing, which is why they do it; in the confusion, they can change the terms mid-sentence and make anything add up to whatever they want, and then admonish you for being too stupid (or too racist, too white, too homophobic, etc.) to see the obvious truth from the beginning.

      2. “2+2 = 4 is just an opinion promoted by dead white males”

        Some dead Arabs — who in ancient ties invented the written number system we use today, along with developing algebra and calculus — were not available for comment.

  4. You can get pregnant by sitting in a public toilet seat, but there are more comfortable places to have sex. 😉

  5. If women are not the only ones who need abortions, does this derail their argument that if you aren’t a woman, you should have no say in the discussion of abortion?

  6. “it’s not only women who need abortions…”

    Nice, FINALLY somebody speaks up for the deadbeat boyfren demographic!

Login or register to comment.