A man who admitted to defacing an LGBTQ mural in South Florida has been ordered by a judge to write a 25-page essay about the shooting at the Pulse gay nightclub, where a gunman killed 49 people in 2016. https://t.co/IZJIcNm0wn
— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 26, 2022
Here is what the paper should say:
The PULSE night club was the site of a hostage crisis and mass casualty shooting on June 12, 2016. The shooting was a terrorist attack carried out by Omar Mateen, a radical Islamist terrorist who pledged allegiance to ISIS. Mateen scouted out several soft targets for hos terrorist attack, including the PULSE nightclub and a Disney location. Mateen was unaware of PULSE being a gay club and selected it due to its lack of security and being a gun free zone. Mateen never mentioned homosexuality or homophobia as motivation for his shooting, instead citing his desire to kill Americans and forcing the withdrawal of American troops from the Middle East as his motivation. Mateen was under surveillance by the FBI, who failed to prevent the shooting.
The narrative that the PULSE shooting was a homophobic or anti-LGBT mass casualty hate crimes was fabricated by the major news media networks to attack presidential candidate Donald Trump. On social media, many people have been lead to believe that a Right Wing, Trump supporter shot up the PULSE nightclub out of bigotry. None of that is factually accurate according to all published reports by local, state, and federal law enforcement. This was one of first major acts of journalistic malpractice carried out against Trump and Republicans.
I guatentee that this judge does not know the facts of the PULSE shooting and believes the media narrative. I further suspect that this individual will be held in contempt of court if his paper does not reflect the narrative.
This judge, I believe, is using this punishment to coerce a lie out of the convicted, along an a mea culpa.
This is absolutely unacceptable. No punishment issued by a judge should force a person to lie.
I fervently believe that this judge should be impeached because this judge clearly does not rely on facts but on Left Wing prejudice.