Cadbury Cream Eggs are candy, for children, sold for Easter, the holiday that celebrates the resurrection and redemption of Jesus Christ.

This is the ad that Cadbury ran:

Did we really need the sexualization of a Cream egg?

Primary consumer of Cadbury eggs: families filling Easter baskets.

Cadbury ad: gay men swapping creamy substances between them.

I’d ask if we could not pervert a children’s candy but I know the answer is “no.”

The whole point of Leftism is to destroy everything beloved by tradition.

I can’t wait until Christmas when Cadbury hires an marketing agency that thinks the best wad to sell chocolate Santas is to fellate them on TV.

 

Spread the love

By J. Kb

2 thoughts on “UK candy company gets marketing agents to have gays ruin candy and Easter”
  1. Not surprised.

    Ads show a massive disproportion of interracial couples, and have been for ages. My estimate, about eight out of ten ads with a family or couple in them are interracial.

    There is nowhere in the universe where that large of a portion of the population is in an interracial relationship. Yet, the leftists feel the need to cram it into 80% of the ads.

    Maybe they do not realize that rule number one in selling is to relate to your customer? People will purchase from companies/salespeople they relate to far quicker and far more often than from someone they do not have a connection to. And, news flash, the overwhelming majority of people are attracted to, and have relationships with people they identify with.

    By forcefeeding gay/interracial/dragqueen ads to the public, the are losing customers, not gaining them. (Sorry cheapass clothing company, as soon as you started using RuPaul as a spokesman, you lost me as a customer.)

  2. Isn’t that, um, adorable? Possibly not.

    To fulfill my role as a misogynist, if that were 2 hot women….. (j/k)

    I agree with CBMTTek’s comment regarding the forcing of non-mainstream concepts into advertising and things that are presented to children (e.g., story books and YA books).

Comments are closed.