When Christine Blasey Ford testified last week before the Judiciary Committee, America witnessed a haunted woman recounting a devastating trauma. But putting aside Ford’s emotional performance and focusing instead on the professor’s testimony reveals numerous inconsistencies in her narrative that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her.

And this conclusion comes from an expert who knows that there are many reasons victims delay reporting sexual abuse. Mitchell also recognized that victims may legitimately not remember certain details related to an attack.
But the problem for Ford is not that she doesn’t remember everything: It is that everything she remembers changes at her convenience.

Christine Blasey Ford’s changing Kavanaugh assault story leaves her short on credibility

I am starting to get the feeling that politicians and Media have either internal poll results or are being told by the common Joe and Jane that  the witch-hunt is backfiring at an enormous scale.  We are starting to see more and more articles and news items slowly backing away from the accusers: From the four “victims” that were the champions against Kavanaugh we are down to Ford and she is finally getting looked over with detail rather than semi-religious fervor in her infallibility.

I also believe it is not helping that Lefty operative are behaving like speech Cossacks harassing Republicans, old ladies in wheelchairs   or vandalizing  private property. I do believe the Silent Majority ha a much different opinion of Dr. Ford’s credibility than what we were bombarded by the Liberals and Media in general.

And Senator Jeff Flake is a laughable creature: He  jumped into a sinking ship thinking he is gonna save his reputation. Talk about miscalculation.

Hat Tip Jay H.

Update: OK, this is funny.

Spread the love

By Miguel.GFZ

Semi-retired like Vito Corleone before the heart attack. Consiglieri to J.Kb and AWA. I lived in a Gun Control Paradise: It sucked and got people killed. I do believe that Freedom scares the political elites.

3 thoughts on “USA Today now doubts Kavanaugh’s accuser.”
  1. I think that a few Dems are smart enough to figure out that the baseless accusations, and screaming sycophants coupled with a ‘Must Have” FBI investigation that is likely to be exculpatory, has jeopardized the expected “Blue Wave.” With a couple more Republican Senators, more conservative Trump court appointees (both for the SCOUS, and lower courts) are inevitable. Dems are soiling their depends.

  2. I’m pretty sure that Mark Judge and PJ Smyth, who are private citizens so the standards for them are different, are filing libel cases that are going to be measured in the eight to nine figure range by the time the dust settles.

    This is the media trying to preemptively reduce the amount they will have to pay in damages from “we have to sell our organs on the black market” to “utter bankruptcy.”

Comments are closed.