As my self-imposed duty, I went on to check my least favorite club of Gun Control “advocates and found Congressman Charles Rangel fishing for a Twitter Townhall Meeting of sorts. Of course,  I HAVE to share with you guys and ladies.

CSGV Charlie Rangel

Just in case, I went to check other Facebook pages and found him again courting the Moms:

Moms Demand Charlie Rangel

Interestingly enough, he did not leave an invitation on the Brady Campaign page or Everytown’s.

So, what are you doing tomorrow? Care to join me in Twitter and give Representative Rangel ( @CBRangel ) our ideas on “Gun Violence”? We can always ask him about taxes and Ethics for fun and giggles.?

Spread the love

By Miguel.GFZ

Semi-retired like Vito Corleone before the heart attack. Consiglieri to J.Kb and AWA. I lived in a Gun Control Paradise: It sucked and got people killed. I do believe that Freedom scares the political elites.

8 thoughts on “We have a date with Congressman Charlie Rangel in Twitter.”
  1. Of course there is that “Gun Free Zone” sign on the door so nobody inside could defend themselves.
    So where do the bad guys go to shoot people?

  2. My Twitter account is strictly for humorous quips and nonsense quotes, and frankly I would do more harm than good on account of my tendency to get emotional about things, so I’ll just weigh in here.

    Well, taxing guns and requiring background checks has never really slowed the bad guys down. It just makes legal guns harder to get ahold of than illegal guns.

    That’s not really what you want to be encouraging, since legal guns are also a lot easier to *track* than illegal guns. Even if the legal guns don’t get put into an illegal database, the owners are still going to be more compliant. For one thing, they think the police are there to protect them, not to arrest them, and they’re more willing to be open about the facts, because they know the facts are going to support them.

    Requiring gun insurance only exacerbates this problem. The insurance is to help people who have been shot with bullets fired from your gun, right? Well, most legal gun owners aren’t ever going to shoot anybody, and when they do, the “victim” is probably going to be shot while actively engaged in criminal activity, particularly a variety of assault against a real victim. So “gun insurance” is really just a form of victim blaming.

    But of course, that’s exactly what they want. Lawful firearm use in self-defense is exactly what they don’t want, because that doesn’t fit the narrative. The only kind of firearm use which is acceptable to the butchers at CSGV is spree-type shooting, preferably the slaughter of children, because that’s the only kind of firearm use that they can use to make gun owners look bad.

    And members of the CSGV would sell their own grandmothers if it could make gun owners look bad. They already have.

  3. Amazing… I’m not a twitter member, but if you search @cbrangel on twitter, over half of the anti-gun people who responded to him are paid for by MDA or CSGV or some derivative thereof. And our side has WAY more play on that search thread than theirs does.

  4. These anti- gun fools need to be made to walk the backstreets and ally way’s from10Pm to 5Am of any medium to large city without a cellphone or a bodyguard then see how quick they change their tune about guns!

Comments are closed.