The New York Times recommended that Biden’s create a “Reality Czar” to counter “disinformation.”

How the Biden Administration Can Help Solve Our Reality Crisis
These steps, experts say, could prod more people to abandon the scourge of hoaxes and lies.

Several experts I spoke with recommended that the Biden administration put together a cross-agency task force to tackle disinformation and domestic extremism, which would be led by something like a “reality czar.”

I think “Minister of Truth” sounds better.  I never liked the idea of any appointed bureaucrat being called “Czar.”

But that point bring me to this?

From the ACLU:

Compare that to this:

So which reality is Czar approved?

The reality of three medical doctors publishing in a sports medicine journal or some lawyers with a Leftists lawfare group?

You know the answer, there are five lights and Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia

A Reality Czar won’t parse the truth, a Reality Czar will only make the Committee for State Reality force you to say 2+2=5.

Spread the love

By J. Kb

6 thoughts on “Whose side do you think the Reality Czar will come down on?”
  1. A couple of years ago, my commie sister posted a meme on her instagram that said “It’s not called having a different opinion, it’s called hate speech”

    Back when Obama was president, she utterly refused to acknowledge that someone–anyone–could have a legitimate policy disagreement with a minority. The only reason to disagree must be rooted in racism*.

    This is the logical progression of that line of thinking.

    *I had a lot of fun at her expense when Carol Swain ran for mayor alongside two old, white, male democrats for Mayor of Nashville. “Aren’t you excited that you’re finally able to vote for a black woman to lead this city?”
    I’d previously made the same jab when Marsha Blackburn went up against Phil Bredesen for US Senate. Weirdly, her policy differences were NOT based on race or gender, but carefully considered positions where she disagreed with the minority candidate. So weird!

  2. They found a couple couch-potato “trans” for the girls to out-compete, and suddenly there’s no problem.

    And their “facts” are completely wrong on basic biology. The “party of science”, folks!

  3. Yeah, trans-women should compete on an equal basis with genetic women. I’m sure trans-men are flocking to compete on the mens athletic teams, because there is no physiological differences between genetic men and genetic women. 2+2=5 indeed.

  4. Pretty soon, you won’t be able to say “X chromosome or Y chromosome ”
    …because, hate speech.

  5. “….put together a cross-agency task force to tackle disinformation and domestic extremism….”

    So, gonna start with the Russian piss story? Or russian collusion? Or “fine people” malarkey?

    No, I did not think so.

    I wonder whether our future involves prison for election fraudsters, lamp post pinatas, or a two way range.

    I know which I pray for.

    I know which I expect.

Comments are closed.