Saw Oleg Volk posting this and it has to be shared.

Hi, I’m Brad Towner. I started Armoured Heaven in August 2010. Since then I’ve built my brand from the ground up selling toy guns on my website www.armouredheaven.com.au. I’ve also attended many pop culture conventions such as Supanova Comic Con & Gaming travelling Australia wide, city to city, to serve customers personally with my great selection of toys….

So as a lot of my awesome customers Australia wide know, I was forcibly stopped by the Penrith LAC Police on 27th March 2017, exactly 12 months today, where they issued a warrant to seize all my toy products deeming them to be imitation firearms by an attending Ballistics Officer. Slowly ever so slowly we fast track to an astounding 11 months later, on misguided promises to my lawyer and practically generating updates to my customers looking foolish advising I have no idea what is going on, to where they finally issue me with a CAN. A Court Attendance Notice. Why? Apparently I’ve for the last 7.5 years have been selling Illegal Firearms, despite the numerous police checks by the Firearm Registry…

The firearm charges are:

1. Possession of 3 or more unregistered firearms including pistol or prohibited firearm

2. Possess unauthorised firearm

3. Posses Ammunition without holding licence/authority

4. Possess or Use a Prohibited Weapon without being licensed.

5. Carry on activities of firearm dealer without being licensed.

Armoured Heaven Firearm Charges

We are talking about toys, not even replica firearms or even airsofts. Yet he is being charged as he ran an “iron pipeline” of illegal guns that were being found in crime scenes.

This is the Australian Model the Gun Control crowd is so fond to mention.

You have been warned.

Seriously, Gun Control should prohibit the access of Media to events like this as the produce evidence they do not want.

One for the “Contradiction Much” files. Click to enlarge:

I am guessing the Wizards from Harry Potter will substitute cops and make sure everybody is safe!

There is no denying it, they have an awesome war chest:

Organizers of the “March For Our Lives” rally in Washington put the early cost estimate for the event at $5 million, and said they have “several million dollars” left to continue to push for stricter gun laws and fight gun violence.

‘March For Our Lives’ Cost $5 Million; ‘Several Million’ Left For Lobbying

How’s that compared to the NRA’s “blood money” the Opposition loves to point out? More than 5 times.

While the group contributes to members of both parties, the lion’s share goes to the GOP. Of the top 85 members of Congress with the most career NRA contributions, 82 are Republicans, according to a database from the Center for Responsive Politics.
Total contributions to candidates exceeded $834,000 in the 2016 campaign cycle, not counting the contributions made to political parties, committees, and other groups.

These are the members of Congress with the most NRA donations

Gun Control burned $5 million in one day while the NRA spent a fifth of that for a whole electoral cycle.  Tell me the hell again the NRA is doing a bad job with the resources it has.

Can you imagine NRA-ILA with half a billion dollars in disposable cash?

Washington Post via the International Lord of Hate.

Like other resistance protests, and like previous gun-control marches, the March for Our Lives was mostly women. Whereas the 2017 Women’s March was 85 percent women, the March for Our Lives was 70 percent women.

Further, participants were highly educated; 72 percent had a BA or higher.
Contrary to what’s been reported in many media accounts, the D.C. March for Our Lives crowd was not primarily made up of teenagers. Only about 10 percent of the participants were under 18.
The average age of the adults in the crowd was just under 49 years old, which is older than participants at the other marches I’ve surveyed but similar to the age of the average participant at the Million Moms March in 2000, which was also about gun control.

Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (No, it wasn’t mostly young people.)

So basically Oprah-watching, Chardonnay-from-the-box-sipping, Xanax-popping women were the attendees . It gets better:

 This group was less politically engaged in general: Only about a third of them had contacted an elected official in the past year, while about three-quarters of the more seasoned protesters had.

Not good. At least I hope to get 50% on our side to be making calls and sending emails. to our elected congresscritters.

Even more interesting, the new protesters were less motivated by the issue of gun control. In fact, only 12 percent of the people who were new to protesting reported that they were motivated to join the march because of the gun-control issue, compared with 60 percent of the participants with experience protesting.
Instead, new protesters reported being motivated by the issues of peace (56 percent) and Trump (42 percent), who has been a galvanizing force for many protests.

Liberalism is composed of many tribes with conflicting interests but sure love to party outside. This is basically a DC version of the Burning Man without the heat, the dust, the fire and the walking porn.

But unsurprisingly, it was still a very liberal crowd: 79 percent identified as “left-leaning” and 89 percent reported voting for Hillary Clinton.

Yeah, there is consensus across the board for Gun Control. I can see that.

Still, keep your guard up. This article going to be as well received as the news that the alleged 800,000 attendees the organizers claimed that came to march, were in fact only 200,000. Bloomberg/Joyce Foundation et al will still try to influence the People and its representatives.

I hope I am wrong, but the idea of a Bloody Shirt Incident to come is nagging the heck out of my guts.

Terse language and all, this is an amazing rebuke from a gun control organization.

It is interesting. I had heard and read rumors that the polls were not being kind to the March for Life and the Gun Control movement in general because of the constant drumming about repealing the Second Amendment, but this tweet seems to prove the message was actually counterproductive.

When the enemy is making a mistake…

Tuesday during an interview with TMZ’s Harvey Levin, gun control proponent and Parkland shooting survivor David Hogg said it was “annoying” he has been rejected by all the University of California campuses that he’d submitted college admissions applications for, but he will continue to “change the world.”

 David Hogg: I’m Changing the World, But UC Schools Still Rejected Me

Several people have expressed their opinions as to why he is being rejected, but I am just gonna take a quote from “Justified” which I think sums it pretty much:

“If you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day, you’re the asshole.”

Dear Girl, may you never have to find out.

This is a great example of the ideological divide: For them fists are something sporty, clean and allowed.  We know that fists are the weapon of the bully, the bruiser, the guy who punches old ladies to rob them. There is nothing clean or sporty or honorable in them.

Let us not forget that the Gun Control crowd is the same one that has opposed Stand Your Ground which was born around the idea that abused women did not need to “retreat” to defend herself from a beat down provided by their significant other.

Only those who have never experienced physical violence and its pain are deluded enough as to think a 110 Lbs. woman is an equal match to an 180 Lbs. Meth freak ex-boyfriend.  Unfortunately, by the time they figure out their mistake, they are either in the ER or the morgue.

Real men defend themselves and their loved ones with the best tools available and they win. They are not stupid enough to think saving a life is some sort of sporting match with carefully constructed rules of behavior and participation.