WASHINGTON (ABC7) — A grand jury indicted 146 more people on Wednesday in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia on felony rioting charges in connection with Inauguration Day.A press release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in D.C. says the 146 people were facing charges relating to incidents that occurred in the four-block area from the intersection of 13th and O Street NW to the intersection of 12th and L Street NW on January 20.Of the 230 people arrested and charged with felony rioting connected with Inauguration Day, 209 have now been indicted.

Source: D.C. court indicts 146 more people on felony rioting charges from Inauguration Day | WJLA

That is gonna leave a mark. Felony rioting is punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. Even if they get the cases dismissed, I am guessing a DC Lawyer does not come cheap, even if Soros is really behind this crap.

Spread the love

By Miguel.GFZ

Semi-retired like Vito Corleone before the heart attack. Consiglieri to J.Kb and AWA. I lived in a Gun Control Paradise: It sucked and got people killed. I do believe that Freedom scares the political elites.

4 thoughts on “D.C. court indicts 146 more people on felony rioting charges from Inauguration Day | WJLA”
  1. Soros may have had a hand in paying for these degenerates to show up and break stuff, but his money sure as hell isn’t going to defend them now. Honestly I don’t care if they even get a day in jail for this, I just want the prosecutors to stick to their guns and no plea down the felony. I want these savages to lose their right to vote and own a firearm or even get a good job again.

    1. “Soros may have had a hand in paying for these degenerates to show up and break stuff…”

      From Wikipedia:

      “The RICO Act focuses specifically on racketeering, and it allows the leaders of a syndicate to be tried for the crimes which they ordered others to do or assisted them in doing, closing a perceived loophole that allowed a person who instructed someone else to, for example, murder, to be exempt from the trial because he did not actually commit the crime personally.[1]

      ( 18 U.S. Code § 1962(c); see also Criminal RICO Prosecutors Manual, elaborating that “A Defendant May Be Liable for a RICO Conspiracy Offense Even if the Defendant Did Not Participate In the Operation or Management of the Enterprise”)

      The ball has been placed on the ‘T’. The AG needs only take the swing…

Comments are closed.