The turn light was not working… I suspect this may have something to do with it.

Gasket around the casing were shot so I just re-caulked with plain old acrylic latex caulk from Home Depot.

A Tweet from California Senator Kamala Harris:

“We know that if we want to live in a world that looks more like Wakanda, the first step is you invest in some women and girls.” #WakandaForeverhttps://t.co/aSyj6GPrFT

— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) December 10, 2018

So she wants the United State to be a racially homogeneous, xenophobic ethno-state, in which non-citizens or people of other races have no civil rights, under the control of a tyrannical monarchy that maintains control by way of hyper-advanced weapons of mass destruction?

But that’s okay because the person who developed the super weapons is a women.

I guess the only real problem that the Progressives have with the Nazis was that they weren’t feminist enough.

Between family stuff, being the end of the year with shit still to be done and having a general piss poor attitude during the Holidays (Yes, I am one of those), you will see less of my very profound and insightful posts…and you can stop laughing now.

In the meantime, please enjoy an example of layers and layers of editorial oversight:

Remember how just yesterday I said Twitter needed to collapse because it has become a means for Social Justice Warriors to expose thought criminals for near decade old jokes.

That was nothing in comparison to what seems to be official Twitter policy of endangering lives by enforcing Sharia law.

Twitter informs critics of radical Islam that they have broken Pakistani laws

Twitter’s legal team has sent official correspondence to at least two very vocal critics of radical Islam ‘in violation of Pakistani law’. Imam Tawhidi, a progressive Muslim scholar from Australia received an email on 3rd December informing him that a particular tweet of his has broken Pakistani law.

https://twitter.com/Imamofpeace/status/1069639319902658562

Similarly, Ensaf Haider, a Canadian human rights activist and wife of Raif Badawi, a Saudi writer and dissident who has been imprisoned for his satirical blogs against Saudi regimes, too received similar notice of having violated Pakistani law.

Funny, Twitter just told me that I'm broken the Pakistan’s law!! pic.twitter.com/ze2EGw63HE

— Ensaf Haidar (@miss9afi) November 30, 2018

In August this year, Pakistan’s Islamabad High Court had ordered blocking Twitter in the country if it does not comply Pakistani government’s request to block objectionable content within 15 days. The Pakistan government has its own notion of what is suitable for public consumption and what falls under the legitimate free speech. The Islamabad High Court had “taken notice of the increase in objectionable content posted on social media websites” following which the Senate Standing Committee had deliberated sending the final notice.

Hence, Twitter is following the law of the land by sending such notices to the said people. In India, too, Twitter has withheld tweets of scientist and columnist Anand Ranganathan and filmmaker and author Vivek Agnihotri which were critical of the Indian judiciary.

Pakistan has stringent blasphemy laws. It came to prominence recently when Asia Bibi, a Pakistani Christian who was convicted of blasphemy in 2010 and sentenced to death, was acquitted by the Pakistani Supreme Court in October 2018. She has since then gone into hiding.

Twitter is willing to enforce Pakistani law outside of Pakistan.  Pakistani law is essentially Sharia law.

In the case of Asia Bibi, she requested asylum in the UK because there were mobs of Pakistani Muslims who wanted her dead, her request for asylum was turned down because of the fear that it would cause “unrest and attacks” by British Muslims in the UK.

Yes, you read that right.  The UK denied a woman asylum because of the threat of domestic terrorism.  The UK folded to terrorism.

So we know that national borders are not a impediment to Sharia and/or Muslim blasphemy law.

Twitter, it seems, is willing to paint a target on the backs of people around the world for violating Pakistan’s blasphemy law.  That invites you to be the target of death threats and terrorism.

Twitter will not suspend an account by a Muslim who proclaims Jews to be termites to his 335,000 followers but will target you for violating Pakistani blasphemy laws.

Why are people still using this platform?

The Women’s March was lauded for leading the #Resistance against President Donald Trump.

The Women’s March lead the #Resistance against Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

The Women’s March mainstreamed #MeToo from an exposure of Hollywood sexual malfeasance to what it is today.

The Women’s March was endorsed by the hard left of the Democrat party like Senators Kristen Gillibrand and Kamala Harris.

The Women’s March had become an extremely important movement for the Democrats, and any Democrat who wanted to get ahead needed to be on its good side.

Here is the truth from the origin of the Women’s March.

Is the Women’s March Melting Down?

On Nov. 12, 2016, a group of seven women held a meeting in New York. They had never worked together before—in fact, most of them had never met—but they were brought together by what felt like the shared vision of an emerging mission.

There were effectively two different cohorts that day. The first one included Breanne Butler, Karen Waltuch, Vanessa Wruble and Mari Lynn Foulger—a fashion designer turned entrepreneur with a sideline in activist politics, who had assumed the nom de guerre Bob Bland. These four were new acquaintances who had connected in the days since Donald Trump’s election, through political networking on social media. Most of them had filtered through the Pantsuit Nation Facebook group, where a woman in Hawaii named Teresa Shook had days before floated the idea of a female-centered march to protest the incoming administration.

So it started with a bunch of disaffected Hillary supporters.

When Wruble relayed her concern that the nascent women’s movement had to substantively include women of color, Skolnik told her he had just the women for her to meet: Carmen Perez and Tamika Mallory.

Linda Sarsour, another colleague from The Gathering for Justice network, was not present for these initial meetings but joined the Women’s March as a co-chair a short time later.

An begins the introduction of intersectionality to the movement.

In advance of the meeting, Bland suggested they convene in Chelsea Market, an upscale food court in Manhattan.

According to several sources, it was there—in the first hours of the first meeting for what would become the Women’s March—that something happened that was so shameful to many of those who witnessed it, they chose to bury it like a family secret. Almost two years would pass before anyone present would speak about it.

Oh do share…

Mallory allegedly first asserted that Jewish people bore a special collective responsibility as exploiters of black and brown people—and even, according to a close secondhand source, claimed that Jews were proven to have been leaders of the American slave trade. These are canards popularized by The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, a book published by Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam—“the bible of the new anti-Semitism,” according to Henry Louis Gates Jr., who noted in 1992: “Among significant sectors of the black community, this brief has become a credo of a new philosophy of black self-affirmation.”

Questions also began to emerge about the ideological values upon which the movement was being built. On Jan. 12, the Women’s March made public their Unity Principles, which asserted: “We must create a society in which women, in particular women—in particular Black women, Native women, poor women, immigrant women, Muslim women, and queer and trans women—are free and able to care for and nurture their families, however they are formed, in safe and healthy environments free from structural impediments.” Numerous observers noted the absence of “Jewish” from the list of signifiers, and began questioning whether it signaled something about whether and how warmly American Jews—the vast majority of whom vote and identify as Democrats—would be welcomed in a changing left.

At the end of January, according to multiple sources, there was an official debriefing at Mallory’s apartment. In attendance were Mallory, Evvie Harmon, Breanne Butler, Vanessa Wruble, Cassady Fendlay, Carmen Perez and Linda Sarsour. They should have been basking in the afterglow of their massive success, but—according to Harmon—the air was thick with conflict. “We sat in that room for hours,” Harmon told Tablet recently. “Tamika told us that the problem was that there were five white women in the room and only three women of color, and that she didn’t trust white women. Especially white women from the South. At that point, I kind of tuned out because I was so used to hearing this type of talk from Tamika. But then I noticed the energy in the room changed. I suddenly realized that Tamika and Carmen were facing Vanessa, who was sitting on a couch, and berating her—but it wasn’t about her being white. It was about her being Jewish. ‘Your people this, your people that.’ I was raised in the South and the language that was used is language that I’m very used to hearing in rural South Carolina. Just instead of against black people, against Jewish people. They even said to her ‘your people hold all the wealth.’ You could hear a pin drop. It was awful.”

So the first meeting of the Women’s March organizers rapidly devolved into a Progressive Wannsee Conference.

And nobody bothered to stop it.  In fact, the Women’s March became a rallying point.

Yet within no time, the March leaders would be named 2017 Women of the Year by Glamour magazine. There was a glossy book published with Condé Nast, a lucrative merchandise business selling branded Women’s March gear, and millions of dollars raised through individual donations and institutional funding from major organizations like Planned Parenthood and the powerful hospital workers union, 1199SEIU. Fortune magazine named Mallory, Linda Sarsour, Perez, and Bland to its list of the World’s Greatest Leaders, and New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand—in explaining why these four were on Time magazine’s list of the 100 Most Influential People—wrote: “The Women’s March was the most inspiring and transformational moment I’ve ever witnessed in politics … and it happened because four extraordinary women—Tamika Mallory, Bob Bland, Carmen Perez and Linda Sarsour—had the courage to take on something big, important and urgent, and never gave up.” In conclusion, the senator declared, “these women are the suffragists of our time.”

It seems like the nearly the entire Democratic party and Left Wing America was joined at the hip to a group literally born of Jew Hatred.

This was the Women’s March from the very first day.

This demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt just how much the Democrats are willing to embrace the worst kind of antisemitism for just the tiniest bit of power.

Let that soak in your mind every time some Democrat politician or supporter accuses the GOP or Trump in trafficking in racist dog whistles or antisemitism.

Sorry, I could not find a YouTube version of it.

[fbvideo link=”https://www.facebook.com/brandon.r.adams.9/videos/2348962995133125/” width=”500″ height=”400″ onlyvideo=”1″]

Found out by coincidence in a tweet from a Venezuelan source. It is all about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. I had to laugh knowing how well it is working there and in many other places around the world.

But I specially like Article 3:

Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

You damn right we do, Skippy. In this country, Article 3 was defined with the Second Amendment in March 4, 1789.

One of the greatest incongruencies you will ever see is people trying to defend both Article 3 and the fact that they surrender it to the State. They do not get that if a right is under the control of a government, stops being a right and becomes a privilege that can be and will be) removed at any time.  They know damn well that history tells us that it will be the State the first one that will violate Article 3, but somehow they still place their trust in it.

Very few counties can celebrate today the true meaning of Article 3 (and some other others too) and that is because we can assure a despotic Government that they do not have a Monopoly of Killing.