First was Apple products, now J. Kb. got blacklisted and unable to post… LOL

Trying to get him back in.

This happened in California:

And guess who jumped at the occasion to claim we need more gun control?

Nobody was shot + there were no guns present and misused + some pansy ass created a false alarm = WE NEED MOAR GUN CONTROL!!! (Don’t forget to send donation)

That sums it up.

…that a shooting with multiple deadly victims suddenly disappear from the news cycle when it is done by an African-American felon with a pistol in a suburb of Gun Control Chicago?

That is so curious…No idea why that happens.

Matt Gaetz was about the only Senator n the Florida Legislature that had no problems standing for gun rights and was damned vocal about it. He got elected for Congress and he dropped a beautiful one on Democrats.

Democrats:
Defend unborn babies? Nein!
More benefits for our Veterans? NEIN DUMMKOPF!
Keep Illegal Aliens safe from Law Enforcement? Yes, please! And two orders to go.

Well played Representative Gaetz.

I have made fun of the Yellow Vest movement  even though among some they are the good revolutionaries because they are fighting the Socialist regime of Macron. I will repeat again that we are seeing Trotskyists fighting Stalinists (or vice versa) and as somebody said, the only bad thing is that both can’t lose.

If I needed to prove my point, I only had to wait and the Internet provides:

We have what seems to be the Spanish version of the Yellow Vests movement using the video of Rep Ilman Omar trying to grill Elliot Abrams to for the Left Wing government in Venezuela.

When John Gotti had Paul Castellano killed, it did not mean he was a good guy. Scumbags fight and/or kill other scumbags for scumbag stuff.

From a sitting United States Senator

100 people die from guns every day. That’s a national emergency.

If Trump gets away w this border emergency declaration, then a Dem President can declare a gun violence emergency and institute universal background checks and an assault weapons ban by executive action.

So…

— Chris Murphy ? (@ChrisMurphyCT) February 15, 2019

I’m going to double down on what Miguel said.

Is there ANYONE in the gun community that honestly doesn’t believe that if the Democrats thought that they could use a national emergency to ban and/or confiscate guns, they would not have done it already?

Is there ANYONE who really believes that  President Pen-and-a-Phone didn’t  EO the confiscation of assault rifles after Sandy Hook out the the kindness of his heart or respect for the Second Amendment?

I’m not saying this to justify using a national emergency to fund the wall, I want no whataoutism here.

I just think the “if you do this for the wall, we’ll do this to guns” is a bunch of horseshit.

They would do it to guns in a heartbeat if they thought for one second they could get away with it.

Look how quickly CA become a sanctuary state.

It the California legislature thought they could get away with passing a law that required 100% of the guns in CA to be turned in and destroyed, it would be passed in record time.

The “If” and quid pro quo in Senator Murphy’s Tweet is pointless.

It’s not beneficence to gun owners that keeps Democrats from banning assault weapons as a national emergency.  It’s that they don’t think they successfully pull it off and hold on to power.

It’s simply a matter of time until they try it, and when they do, it will have nothing to do with Trump’s wall.