Let’s start with the end: Twitter User Pamela Fick engaged in an argument about the Second Amendment.

pamela fick 1

This is sadly hilarious because I had been exchanging tweets with the lady who, for some reason thought I was on the side of Gun Control (no idea why 🙂 ). I could not help myself and fed her some standard gun control lines that collide directly with our Bill of Right and apparently she had no problem with that:

Pamela Flick 2
So Ms. Fick in a few exchanges pretty much discarded the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth and I think even the Sixth Amendments in the name of “safety”.  For Pamela, the idea of Unintended Consequences is not even a remote blip in cranial radar; she figures that the “enforcements” she champions will be only selectively applied to those she does not like and she will be spared of the nasty things it may bring. ….until it bites her in the ass.

In a very sad and twisted way, our fight to preserve all the Bill of Rights is not done for our lifestyle but hers as well.

A thankless job that has to be done.

Spread the love

By Miguel.GFZ

Semi-retired like Vito Corleone before the heart attack. Consiglieri to J.Kb and AWA. I lived in a Gun Control Paradise: It sucked and got people killed. I do believe that Freedom scares the political elites.

6 thoughts on “A Gun Control Advocate view of the Bill or Rights (Mostly invisibility)”
  1. Anti-freedom, not anti-rights.

    If somebody doesn’t believe ownership of arms for protection is a right, they don’t believe you have any other rights.

Comments are closed.

Login or register to comment.