Sam Brinton was fired. It is likely that he will face charges.
I’ve had security clearances in the past. The goal of a clearance is to reduce the risk of the person being given a secret from sharing it.
To this end when performing a background check they are looking to see how well you are able to keep your word. In short how trustworthy you are. They are looking for criminal acts which might just disqualify a person as a matter of policy and they are looking for illegal acts (drug use) that might be disqualifying.
Having established if you are trustworthy they next look into how easy would it be to compromise your integrity. A person that is a few thousand dollars in debt is unlikely to betray their country for those few thousand dollars. The same person in debt for the same amount to a lownshark might be willing to sell a little secret in exchange for keeping working kneecaps.
So debt load and who you are in debt to plays a part in whether they feel a person can be trusted. Trustworth is not the same as trusted.
They then look at things that might be compromising. Things that might embarrass you. I knew homesexuals that had security clearances. They were required to out themselves to their parents and family. This is so that no bad actor could say “if you don’t share this small secret with us we will out you to your wife/parents whatever”
In the same way they don’t want you to have any embarrassing secrets from your employer or family/community.
Finally the look for things that might indicate that you have bad judgement or that you do things that might allow you to say things while not fully cognitive. I.e. while drunk or stoned.
The fact that Sam is non-binary and into kink does not instantly disqualify him for a clearance. All of the criminal activity around him does.
For example consider the following exposure of Col. Donnelly and CPT Tenney.
🚨Military Sickness Exposed🧵🚨
Past @Mdarmyguard CO: 58th EMIB, 1100th TASMG
Posing in uniform w 🐶 mask👇
— NOVA Campaigns (@NoVA_Campaigns) December 9, 2022
(H/T to a reader)
My issue with this pair is that there is a level of inappropriate behavior between a superior and his direct report.
In the same way I had no problem with Billy Clinton having sex in the oval office. I didn’t care if it was with his wife or some hooker the SS brought in. I had and have a problem with him having sex with an intern.
If the CEO of some firm had sex with an intern we would have seen him fired and lambasted. Billy doing it was a matter between he and his wife. We know that a CEO would be fired because a CEO for IIRC McDonald’s was fired for exactly this thing shortly after.