This woman is clearly a psychopath.

https://twitter.com/yassinelrufian/status/1614349097531473921?s=19

The biggest criticism I have of Israel is that I never fought with the venom and hatred that the Palestinians have when they attack Israel.

Every Palestinian child that picks up a Rick should be shot on sight.

If you’re going to be accused of genocide, you might as well wipe out your enemy.

Georgia boy, 11, pulled from bike and attacked by ‘loose’ pit bulls loses part of ear, most of his scalp

An 11-year-old boy is missing 70% of his scalp after he was pulled from his bicycle and attacked by three loose pit bulls while on a ride through the neighborhood.

The boy, Justin Gilstrap, was missing half of his ear, had bites on his leg, and had much of his scalp ripped off by the time police arrived on the scene.

Burt Baker III, the owner of the dogs, told police his dogs enjoy chasing people on bicycles. Baker was arrested shortly after and charged him with reckless conduct.

“There isn’t an inch of his body that doesn’t have a cut or bruise,” Justin’s mom, Ericka Gilstrap, told WRDW. “His life will never be the same again.”

Mason’s mother, Kellie Aguilar, said this isn’t the first time the family has filed a complaint about Baker’s dogs.

“Nobody’s ever done anything,” Ericka added. “They just run loose. They’re not behind the fence. They’re not tied up. They run loose 24/7.″

According to Ericka Gilstrap’s Facebook, Justin has been suffering a fever and just left surgery where some of his skin from his leg and scalp were removed. Doctors say they are optimistic the integra graft will begin soon.

It’s sad to say that this boy is lucky that he still has both arms and legs.

The part about the pitbulls roaming free and enjoying chasing people?

After the first time the police did nothing about that, that’s when the 62 grain varmint grenades come out.

I’ve seen what those do to coyotes.  Should be equally effective on pitbulls.

At the University of Michigan, a call to murder Jews. pic.twitter.com/UoA0LUft1h

— Blake Flayton (@blakeflayton) January 13, 2023

Don’t let the Left bullshit you with changing the definition of words.  Like they did when they tried to convince everyone that Jihad ackchyually means a peaceful internal spiritual struggle.

Intifada really does mean armed rebellion, and is what the Palestinians called to major terrorist uprisings against Israel that killed hundreds of Israeli civilians.

Now they are calling for it in Michigan.

Remember that according to Palestinian philosophy, any attack on a Jew anywhere is an attack on Israel, and if you can’t get to Israel to fight the Jews there, you can attack Jews where you live.  This is why we see Palestinians in Europe stabbing European Jews during every Intifada.

The Jews of Michiganistan need to get armed and watch their backs.

I was thinking about this last night after my post about the new ATF arm brace rule.

There are millions of arm braces that were sold.  It was much more common than bump stocks ever were.

The Reload says the estimate at 10-40 million.

The Congressional Research Service estimates there are between 10-40 million pistol-brace-equipped firearms. The ATF's new rule requires nearly all of them to be registered, turned in, or destroyed for owners to avoid felony charges. https://t.co/ULdkCNunGs

— Stephen Gutowski (@StephenGutowski) January 13, 2023

The ATF will not be able to process even a fraction of guns submitted on a Form 1 in anything close to the timeline they require.

But then there are other considerations.

There are many people who own braced pistols because they cannot own SBRs.

AR pistols are/were legal outside of Cook County (until this latest AWB).  Illinois dies not allow the possession of NFA items.

Upstate New York and California are the same.  It was possible to assemble a compliant pistol but not own an SBR.

Then there are counties where SBR possession might be legal by state law but the local Sheriff won’t sign the Form 1 paperwork.

Blue counties in Red states are notorious for this.

These individuals have no choice but to destroy their guns or hand them over to law enforcement.

There is the issue of interstate travel.  Most people, even some SBR owners, don’t know that to take an SBR out of state requires permission from the ATF on a Form 5320.20.

This is why I never did a Form 1.  I’ve moved four times in six years.  With an SBR I’d have to get ATF permission to do that.

And removing the brace isn’t enough.  The whole definition of a pistol has been changed.  In essence, if you own a pistol version of a rifle or sub machine gun, it’s an SBR by intent.

So your 11.5 inch AR pistols or CZ Scorpion or any other PDW style 9mm pistol now requires a Form 1.

Considering how many of those were sold in the last decade or more since the ATF let them be pistols, this is going to turn tens or possibly a hundred million guns into illegal SBRs.

The only good news here is that this has the potential to be so disruptive that if the court shot down the bump stock ban, it will have no choice to shoot this down too.

If anything, this decision might have given ammunition to the case for challenging the constitutionality of the SBR/SBS clause of the NFA (if not the whole NFA) by suddenly turning SBRs into guns in common use with a rule.

What I do know is that a blizzard of lawsuits need to be filed.

From the Bureau of Assholes, Twats, and Fuckers just dropped their arm brace rule.

On January 13, 2023, the Attorney General signed ATF final rule 2021R-08F, “Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached ‘Stabilizing Braces,’” amending ATF’s regulations to clarify when a rifle is designed, made, and intended to be fired from the shoulder.

The rule outlines the factors ATF would consider when evaluating firearms equipped with a purported “stabilizing brace” (or other rearward attachment) to determine whether these weapons would be considered a “rifle” or “short-barreled rifle” under the Gun Control Act of 1968, or a “rifle” or “firearm” subject to regulation under the National Firearms Act. The rule’s amended definition of “rifle” clarifies that the term “designed, redesigned, made or remade, and intended to be fired from the shoulder” includes a weapon that is equipped with an accessory, component, or other rearward attachment (e.g., a “stabilizing brace”) that provides surface area that allows the weapon to be fired from the shoulder, provided other factors, as listed in the definition, indicate the weapon is designed and intended to be fired from the shoulder.

This rule does not affect “stabilizing braces” that are objectively designed and intended as a “stabilizing brace” for use by individuals with disabilities, and not for shouldering the weapon as a rifle. Such stabilizing braces are designed to conform to the arm and not as a buttstock. However, if the firearm with the “stabilizing brace” is a short-barreled rifle, it needs to be registered within 120-days from the date of publication in the Federal Register.

This rule is effective the date it is published in the Federal Register. Any weapons with “stabilizing braces” or similar attachments that constitute rifles under the NFA must be registered no later than 120 days after date of publication in the Federal Register; or the short barrel removed and a 16-inch or longer rifle barrel attached to the firearm; or permanently remove and dispose of, or alter, the “stabilizing brace” such that it cannot be reattached; or the firearm is turned in to your local ATF office. Or the firearm is destroyed.

Please note that this is the text of the final rule as signed by the Attorney General, but the official version of the final rule will be as it is published in the Federal Register. The rule will go into effect once it is published in the Federal Register.

Go check to see if your arm brace is now an SBR.

Act accordingly.