Where a Hispanic Catholic, and a Computer Geek write about Gun Rights, Self Defense and whatever else we can think about.
Miguel.GFZ
Semi-retired like Vito Corleone before the heart attack.
Consiglieri to J.Kb and AWA.
I lived in a Gun Control Paradise: It sucked and got people killed.
I do believe that Freedom scares the political elites.
After I contacted them again via Facebook the next day, I got a canned reply and silence ever since. Since then, I have been twice to Lowe’s and just today to my favorite Home Depot in neither place a made fuzz was made about wearing masks.
Still a lot of people wearing the Fauci Diapers out there, so it is your responsibility to go into places with a free face and pride beaming from your aura to make people realize they are just going being inertially silly.
Almost half of Floridians are vaccinated with one or both doses and the last 7 days we had 10 or less daily deaths related to the Chin-Flu. And from what I have seen in Social Media, Fear Porn is losing its luster rapidly.
Some things I collected after a quick search in the net:
Regardless of footwear and gender, it can be claimed that a forceful stomp or jump to someone’s head supported on the ground can cause facial and skull fractures. Thus, forceful stomps or jumps to someone’s head can cause potential fatal injuries independent of footwear, gender, or fitness level.
In 64% of cases there were fractures of the calvaria, skull base or facial bones. Injuries to the neck included fractures of the throat ‘skeleton’ in 29% (hyoid bone 14%, laryngeal cartilage/bone 15%); rib fractures were present in 1/3 rd cases and the liver was ruptured in 25%. 42% of the victims died of blood loss (internal or external), whilst 12.6% died of blood aspiration.
What is a Crushing Brain Injury?
Head trauma from a crushing brain injury, as the name implies, occurs when the brain and skull are crushed—usually between two hard objects. The more forceful the crushing is, the more severe damage will be, but damage also depends on factors such as the location of the injury and overall brain health. For example, people who have vascular issues may suffer blood clots or strokes after a crushing brain injury.
Side Effects of a Crushing Brain Injury Head Trauma
A crushing brain injury causes damage to the brain, blood vessels, and skull, each of which can be life-threatening:
A skull fracture exposes the brain to further damage by robbing the brain of its protective case. Further, fragments of the skull may puncture the brain or blood vessels, causing more damage.
Most crushing skull injuries cause severe bleeds, as blood vessels are crushed under the weight of the skull or the objects that led to the injury. If severe enough, you can bleed to death. Even when the bleeding is relatively minor, it can cause damage to the brain or to surrounding structures, such as the spinal cord or sinuses.
The brain itself usually suffers extreme injuries as a result of a crushing brain injury. The severity of the damage depends upon the force behind the crushing, as well as the location of the damage. For instance, damage to the brain’s language centers can produce difficulties speaking or understanding language. The damage may be short or long-term, and may change over time. It’s common for brain injuries to continually produce new side effects, even as old side effects disappear.
TALLAHASSEE (CBSMiami/NSF) – A federal judge this week rejected a request for a temporary restraining order against a controversial new law championed by Gov. Ron DeSantis to crack down on violent protests.
U.S. District Judge Paul Byron issued a six-page order Tuesday denying a temporary restraining order sought by plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed April 21 in federal court in Orlando.
I tried to find the order, but could not fid it. I guess we will have to depend on the article itself.
The accusation made by the plaintiffs (BLM and associates) is simple:
“Petitioners fear they will be unable to exercise their First Amendment rights under the enforcement of this law due to the history of wrongful discretionary and discriminatory actions and crimes of municipal law enforcement officers toward Black and Brown Americans that participate in protests or demonstrations,” the motion said.
But the defendants ran into a judge that had an “unusual” demand for political times like the ones we live in:
But Byron wrote that the plaintiffs’ “analysis of the particular constitutional issues presented here is too thin and conclusory to justify the extraordinary remedy” of a temporary restraining order.
“The fatal flaw of plaintiffs’ motion is that they take for granted that HB 1 is unconstitutional – it may well be, but plaintiffs do not explain how or why,” Byron wrote.
Probably to the shock of the plaintiff, the judge dared to ask for some sort of evidence showing cause. Just because you don’t like something, you just cannot call it unconstitutional and expect the judge to rule in your favor.
There is another lawsuit progressing in another court and Lord knows what the judge will say. But if he/she says something similar, IMHO we can pretty much kiss goodbye this initial effort to curb the new law. And truthfully after reading it several times, I do not see how can it be reverted as the contents simply address violent behavior and the plaintiffs would have to sell to the courts that such violence is protected speech which I doubt the courts, no matter how drunk they could get, accept as true.
