At the end of the day, the New York Daily News depends on advertising to survive, unless they happen to get a Mexican sugar daddy like the New York Times. And poor Less-Than-She-Slug Greg Kuntzman is trying to maintain his 15 seconds of Internet notoriety, so he needs to keep poking around like an annoying Facebook acquaintance by feasting on the bodies of the fallen Dallas PD.

So the solution is simple:

It is 5:30 am and officially in the regurgitating part of the news cycle. Other than 5 officers killed, 6 wounded, one suspect dead and 3 more in custody, we don’t know shit. 

Speculations are rampant and I won’t give into them. Two items are for sure:

This is the smartest Open Carrier in Dallas. Initially determined “person of interest” he had nothing to do with the shooting and by the time the tweet by Dallas PD came out seeking him,, it seems he had already gone voluntarily to the nearest officer to avoid confusions.

And then, these assholes:

Just over an hour after the killing had began, while still a suspect is shooting it out with police, these fucking vultures come out to feed on the corpses of the fallen officers for their petty political purposes.

I want to talk about the shooting of Philando Castile.

I have no interest in talking about Alton Sterling.  I have no interesting in the shooting of Castile AND Michael Brown, Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, or Trayvon Martin.  I do not want the shooting of Castile to become just another hashtag for #BLM to Mau-Mau with.

The essence of empathy is the ability to put yourself in another persons’ shoes.  I am white, I grew up in a middle class neighborhood, I have no criminal record.  I know enough not to resist the police.  I feel confident that I won’t be sought after by cops for strong arming a convenience store.

The shooting of Philando Castile, on the other hand, sends a bolt of fear through my heart.  I have concealed carry permits, I regularly carry concealed, I have gun that lives permanently in my glove box, and I have a wife and kid.  This could have been me.

I don’t have any unique details of this shooting, only what has been made available on the news, but from what I read, this shooting seems to be the tragic combination of bad – but not malicious – acts of both Castile and the officer.  This is critical to preventing future shootings of this type and is something I don’t want to get buried in BLM politics.

Here are the bad acts as I see them.

Castile:

Castile announced that he had a gun THE WRONG WAY.

There are some states that require a CCW permit holder announce that they have a gun to police.  Some states don’t require it, but I have been taught (and I believe) that it is best to announce anyway.  The worst case is that a cop discovers your gun for himself.

The speech that I have practiced in my head over and over is – while holding the steering wheel with both hands – “Officer, I have a concealed carry permit.  I am currently carrying.  What would you like me to do?”

Now the cop knows 1) I have a permit, 2) I have a gun, 3) he is in control of the situation.

I have been pulled over a few times in my adult life.  I have had a cop tell me to slowly get out my licence and permit.  I have had a cop ask me to get out so he could secure my gun for the stop, which he returned to me unloaded at the end.

I believe that Castile announcing that he had a gun BEFORE announcing that he had a permit (his girlfriend actually said he had the permit) was his first mistake.  Announcing he had a gun while moving was his second.

Neither mistake justified the shooting.

The cop:

The officer (in my opinion) over reacted.  If the girlfriend’s statement is correct, the officer asked for Castile’s licence and then told him not to move.  These are contradictory commands.  Castile was shot in the confusion between complying with the first and not complying with the second.  I believe that the officer heard “gun” and got (for lack of a better way of describing it) tunnel vision.  He didn’t hear or didn’t register that Castile had a permit.  He reacted by drawing and shooting.  The officer lost his composure, his ability to assess the situation accurately, and killed a man.

How much race played into this over reaction, I do not know.

However, there have been a number of examples of police over reacting in the presence of concealed carriers.  The gun community is familiar with the now infamous Canton, Ohio police officer, Daniel Harless.  Harless was caught on video, multiple times, threatening to murder concealed carry permit holders.

Then there is this traffic stop out of Florida.  Watch how the interaction goes from relatively calm to the officer yelling, cursing, and threatening to shoot an elderly white man in the back when the officer discovers the man is carrying lawfully.

Then there is the case of the shooting of Army Veteran and West Point graduate Erik Scott.  Scott was exiting a Costco and was shot by Las Vegas PD.  Scott was given contradictory commands to both “get on [his] knees” and “drop [his] weapon” and was shot several times in the ensuing confusion.

I believe that these cases have more in common with the shooting of Castile than the shooting of Castile has with Michael Brown or Tamir Rice.

Some in the media are focusing entirely on the racial aspects of the Castile shooting, going as far as to claim that the Second Amendment does not apply to black people.  Others, having overcome their temporary PTSD and bruised shoulder, blamed the NRA.  This is ridiculous, offensive, and the wrong lesson to be learned.

The fact is concealed carry is skyrocketing.  Several states have gone to permitless Constitutional Carry.  This means that police are going to be interacting with more and more lawful concealed carriers.  It is vital that the police adopt training and policies to avoid misunderstandings with carriers that turn violent.

Yes, carriers have a duty to be up-front with police.  Yes, carriers should be careful in what they say to police to convey that they are armed.  But a poorly worded sentence should not be a death sentence.  “Officer, I have a gun on me…” shouldn’t result in a police shooting.  There needs to be better protocols in place for police to handle concealed carriers with good intentions, allowing police to keep their composure in these type of situations.

Concealed carry is a right, a right that is being practiced by more and more people.  It is vital for the safety of both armed citizens and police for systems to be put in place to prevent these over reactions and tragedies of errors.  This is the real lesson to be learned from the death of Philando Castile.

Unfortunately, this lesson is going to be lost in the inevitable BLM activities and protests by the racial animus exacerbating, grievance mongering social justice crowd.

J.Kb is in charge…. ya’ll behave while I am gone.

Mr Pearce is an Adjunct Assistant Professor at Southern State Community College and apparently quite the liberal free-thinker. His Facebook’s like are a cornucopia of Bullshit Artists (Think Mel Brooks) and assorted outlandish causes and groups.

He is warned it is not so easy:

And he “smartly” replies:

Legal advice came along and then, that one guy:

And then, backtracking:

And I have a feeling this guys is not joking:

Let’s face it, I feel I am more in danger from the missus for not taking out the trash on time than from Mr. Pearce., bless his caring soul…wait.

Never mind.

Hat Tip JD Kinman

A man was shot and killed by police, the bloody aftermath of which was broadcast live on Facebook in a video where the man’s girlfriend says the “police shot him for no apparent reason, no reason at all.”

Philando Castile, 32, an elementary school cafeteria supervisor who studied at the University of Minnesota, is seen bloodied and in pain with a gunshot wound to the stomach as the video comes on and his girlfriend begins talking to the camera.

“He told him that it was in his wallet, but he had a pistol on him because he’s licensed to carry. The officer said don’t move. As he was putting his hands back up, the officer shot him in the arm four or five times,” she said.

Source: Facebook Live Video Shows Man Dying from Police Shooting

We don’t see what happened prior to the beginning of the video, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there was  lot of tension followed by contradictory orders by the police and not having a prior plan on how to address and inform of the status.

Here is a good video of Massad Ayoob explaining what you should do in a case like that. Notice the Tom Gresham is carrying his ID in a front pocket of his vest rather than the back pants pocket. I have been doing that ever since I started to carry because cops like to see hands at all times.

At a time like this, your goal is not to get shot. Keep the “Am I being Detained?” BS for Gun Forum discussions. Be polite, comply with the officer and you may even get a break with the ticket. Above all: Have a plan and practice it.

In the last week, this is what I have seen:

The former Secretary of State and current Presidential Candidate, was under investigation by the FBI for violating Federal law in mishandling classified information.  That mishandling possibly allowing classified information to fall into the hands of less than friendly nations.

The former President of the United States and husband of the Secretary of State was under investigation meeting with the Attorney General of the United States in an unofficial meeting on an airplane.

The  former Secretary of State and current Presidential Candidate floated the idea that if she won the election, the current Attorney General might be kept on an be the Attorney General of her administration.

The Attorney General punts on determining if prosecution is warranted  based upon the FBI investigation to the FBI, abdicating her legal responsibilities.

The FBI Director holds a press conference detailing all the ways the former Secretary of State and current Presidential Candidate violated Federal law, as well as showing evidence that she committed perjury during her testimony in a previous (Benghazi) hearing.  Despite the evidence to this felonious behavior, the FBI Director recommends against prosecution of the  former Secretary of State and current Presidential Candidate, while admitting that anybody else would be brought up on charges for doing the same thing.

The Justice Department headed by the Attorney General, announced that none of the assistants or support people involved in this violation of Federal law will be prosecuted either.

Following the FBI Director’s press conference, the current President of the United States attends a campaign rally for the former Secretary of State and current Presidential Candidate, in which he allows the former Secretary of State and current Presidential Candidate to break with tradition and decorum and give a campaign speech from behind the Seal of the President of the United States.

Now the political party of the President of the United States, the former Secretary of State, and the Attorney General, as well as the majority of journalists covering this want the rest of us to believe that what appears to be naked, open, and abject corruption, is just a lot of hoo-hah over nothing.

Let me ask this question:

At this point, is it even worth holding an election?  If those in power are going to be so corrupt so brazenly, is it necessary to go through the pro forma process of an election?  If the current President simply appointed the former Secretary of State to the position of President by executive action, in the words of the former Secretary of State ” what difference does it make?”