Andrew Branca offers his insight.
Give us guilty, on all counts, even on counts not actually being argued in this trial, or we burn it all down generally, and target defense witnesses and, by implication, the trial jurors specifically.
Good luck with that, America.
Frankly, at this point it’s absolutely apparent that Derek Chauvin can receive nothing like a fair trial in this case. When I write that, by the way, I’m defining “fair trial” as one involving a process we’d want for ourselves or a loved one, or even a friend or neighbor.
No one would want to be on trial, or have anyone they cared about on trial, in a courthouse surrounded by a violent, raging mob, being exhorted to further violence by government officials, with militant factions of political groups terrorizing the witness for the defense, and by extension the jury itself.
Yet that is what’s been offered to Derek Chauvin as “justice.”
LIVE Chauvin Trial Day 15: Witness & Jury Intimidation, Cranked Up to 11
Go read the whole thing
Annnd, the Communist Red Guards, go full KKK. “To Kill a Mocking Bird” on steroids
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9487085/Prosecutor-Daunte-Wrights-case-speaks-time.html
Let’s intimidate prosecutors while we’re at it
The interesting problem with the Daunte Wright case is that, if the cop had intended deadly force, an argument could certainly be made that this was justified. Remember that he had jumped bail and as a result had a warrant out for his arrest on an armed robbery charge. This wasn’t merely a traffic stop, let alone a “stopped because of an air freshener” as some ludicrous claims would have us believe. So if it comes to trial, I would expect the defense to argue that issue.
That said, left wing prosecutors such as infest MN certainly are more deserving of “protests”. Schadenfreude, anyone?