I found this jewel in the CSGV’s Twitter photo gallery.

So Catherine is willing to take up arms (and I imagine one of the awful assault weapons because she is going in the military) because she feels threatened? Bit of a contradiction there. Shouldn’t she declare all space in a one mile radius of her person a Gun Free Zone? It works wonders, you know?

Laddites, you gotta love them.


Spread the love

By Miguel.GFZ

Semi-retired like Vito Corleone before the heart attack. Consiglieri to J.Kb and AWA. I lived in a Gun Control Paradise: It sucked and got people killed. I do believe that Freedom scares the political elites.

8 thoughts on “CSGV: Love the contradictions.”
  1. Wow, she is uninformed. I would love to have no restrictions to buy and sell any firearm, to include her so-called “Assault Weapons” which do not even exist. Its a fake name for scary-looking guns. It’s difficult to take them seriously until they drop this moniker.

    The scenario she paints is that the government is the aggressor and not respecting the Bill of Rights and infringing on the Second Amendment. Now that could indeed justifiably start a “civil” war. Who would start this… they would, by demanding that the government not obey its own obligations. Would this twit object if the government took away her right to practice the religion of her choice? How about her ability to publish on Twitter? Is she ready to defend her right to a jury trial? How does she feel about quartering of troops in her home?

    Newsflash Catherine Conroy, the BOR is not an a la carte menu that you choose only the ones you want. To seal the deal for union of the states into the U.S., it was the BOR. All of it.

  2. Let me see if I get this straight? She has no problem using a govt issue, fully automatic assault rifle to kill her neighbors just because they want the right to own semi automatic facsmiles of assault rifles.

Comments are closed.