I guess someone just told the Congresswoman that she is in the top 3% of income percentile in the US and makes four times the median individual income in the country, and that when she gets her Congressional grift game on and she starts clearing $400,000 per year she’s going to be in the top 1%.

This is the No. 1 rule if “tax the rich Leftists,” the definition of “rich” is alway more than what you make.

Spread the love

By J. Kb

4 thoughts on “It depends on what your definition of “rich” is”
  1. This is the No. 1 rule if “tax the rich Leftists,” the definition of “rich” is alway more than what you make.

    Not always — Al Gore defined “millionaires” as people making $100,000 a year or more in income, because over the course of a decade they earn a million.

  2. I recall an old Cold War joke that went, roughly, “If you’re a communist and only have one cow, the man with two cows is a kulak; If you’re a communist and have two hundred cows, the man with 201 cows is a kulak.”

    Rep. Ocasio-Cortez and her ilk will never use any sort of empirical and objective definition for “rich,” “wealthy,” “fair share” or anything else. They will only speak about these things in subjective and emotional language. They want the people with one cow and the people with two hundred cows to vote for them, so they appeal to their feelings of jealousy, envy, and greed.

  3. Look carefully at the photos of the event. The attendees are all chatting to each other in tight little groups. Without masks.

    The staff? They are all standing against the walls in neat rows, wearing their masks, with their ID on lanyards around their necks. Waiting on every whim of their Lords and Mistresses.

    That is the vision of our future by our elite leadership.

Comments are closed.