The Left has gone nuts trying to push the idea of Affirmative Consent in sexual acts, which is defined as “affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity” every step of the way. Affirmative Consent, when taken literally, makes any sex act rape unless it is explicitly consented to. This is now the new legal standard for sex on California college campuses.
Now lets hop over to Europe, where the Left loves to take its cues from. The Austrian Supreme Court overturned the conviction of a 20 year old Iraqi immigrant man, who raped a 10 year old boy in a public pool. The Iraqi man said that he had a “sexual emergency” since he had left his wife back in Iraq and had not had sex in four months, so had to rape the 10 year old. The Austrian Supreme Court decided that because the man was from Iraq, and had different cultural norms than Europeans, he couldn’t be sure the 10 year old – who had to be hospitalized because of the attack – did not want to be raped.
Let me say that again.
The Austrian Supreme Court said that an Iraqi man could not have raped a 10 year old boy, because the Iraqi man didn’t know that the 10 year old didn’t want to be raped, because of cultural differences.
The Left in America has no logical or moral consistency. So what happens when President Hillary Clinton brings in tens-thousands of Middle Eastern refugees?
Will Affirmative Consent hold fast, or will Affirmative Consent only apply Americans, and Islamic migrants get a pass because of religious and cultural differences, the way they do in Europe?
My money is on the later.
I am going to spell this out very clearly, so that in the coming years, the powers that be cannot deny that they have been warned.
The Left better not attempt to ignore or normalize sexual assault or rape by Islamic migrants, and decide that laws against rape and sexual assault don’t apply because of cultural differences.
The day that I have to worry that some migrant suffering from a “sexual emergency” is in the locker room of the Y, is the day the I decide that the “no guns allowed” sign on the front door of the Y doesn’t apply to me because of cultural differences too.
It’s my Don’t Tread On Me American culture, and those of us who abide those cultural norms have no qualms against blowing away anyone who lays a hand on our wives or children with malicious intent.
The refugee who tries to have a “sexual emergency” with my son won’t have the luxury of a court overturning his conviction, because I will have already had a “Golden Saber emergency” in his direction.
I know that I am not alone.
UPDATE
A few hours after finishing this post, I was going through my usual list of European news sites to check up on and I caught this article: Migrant foster mum reveals her horror at discovering ’12-year-old refugee’ in her care is actually a 21-year-old Jihadi.
Overturning a conviction for the rape of a 10 year old by a 20 year old migrant over cultural differences was not the worst news of the day. The UK had to go full retard, and then some.
It has been news for some time that some refugees are falsely claiming to be children to get preferred refugee status. This is the first case I’ve heard of where an adult refugee “child” has been adopted by a foster family.
Alarm bells rang when the family went swimming and Rosie’s [the foster mom] 13-year-old commented on how hairy he was… On a bus to college he was told to get off by a driver who didn’t believe he was 16. Rosie, who lives in the South East, said: “It’s ridiculous how everybody else could see it but not the social workers.”
Alarm bells didn’t go off when she first laid eyes on Jamal?
At a climbing centre he shimmied up ropes with ease, and at a shooting range he stripped a gun before firing it… Jamal’s behaviour worsened. He put the 13-year-old in expert holds, demanded cash and got calls from unknown numbers.
Great, he’s gotten some terrorist training too.
Here is where this goes from scary to full on horrifying.
He roomed with a boy, aged 13. Two girls, 12 and 14, were also in the house… His last words to Rosie were: “I’ll kill you and I know where your children are.”
It’s a good thing, I guess, that Jamal was JUST a terrorist and didn’t have a “sexual emergency” with his foster family.
Let me say this again, in America, we are just a little different than they are in Europe.
Where I live, if a nice middle class family has a sleep over for their 12 year old, and Jamal the 21 year old terrorist shows up with a bedroll, we’re not going to put up with that. If Jamal the 21 year old terrorist thinks he can threaten his way into getting what he wants, the only thing 12 about the situation will the the gauge of buckshot load he takes to the chest.
If the vetting process Clinton intends to put in place is anywhere near as good as the one the UK or Sweden has, Clinton needs to realize the American people will do their own vetting – with a vengeance.
All I have to say is WTF!!!!!
No, seriously, WHAT THE F!!!!!!
Cultural differences? Bull. This exposes the fundamental mental disconnect that defines a liberal.
A liberal is so open minded that they will refuse to take their own side in an argument.
That one, fundamental mental disconnect is at the core of everything a liberal does. They are so driven, so compelled to demonstrate how tolerant they are, that they will gladly destroy their own culture, morals, economy, and life in order to demonstrate support for a conflicting culture.
The greater the conflict between the liberal’s culture or beliefs and the conflicting culture, the more adamant the liberal will support that culture over their own. And, they will describe this as being moral, as being tolerant. They will equate it to the sacrifices that a parent will make for a child, or a soldier will make to save their brothers in arms.
Where that analogy fails is the liberal is sacrificing your life, liberty, and safety, not their own.
The proper response to rape is punished by stoning in evil islamic hellholes. So, to “respect” cultural differences, the SOB should have had a big rock crush his sick head.
I will not tolerate one piece of sharia shit here. The first judge to accomodate must be removed from office.
The statement “at a shooting range…” Makes me think this is a fake story…. It’s supposed to be in UK….
Actually, skeet and trap are quite popular in the UK, and there are numerous air gun ranges as well.
So, it is quite possible the jihadi was at an event where they were shooting clays.
Not to nitpick, but:
This is now the new policy standard for sex on California college campuses.
Fixed it. It’s a college policy, not a legal standard, which is what the police/courts use.
A man expelled from school for “sexual assault” rarely gets convicted of rape (unless he actually IS a rapist) because the definitions and burdens of proof are VASTLY more stringent in the “real world” than they are on California college campuses. A shockingly high number of “sexual assaults” on campus involve a female who, six months later, is convinced by a “college counselor” that because she feels bad about a hook-up NOW, it must have been rape THEN.
This is not to disparage or discredit the real assaults that DO happen (but thankfully are not common), but it is the new reality on college campuses.