It’s always the places you can’t carry you need a gun the most – NYC bail reform and one punch edition

Two stories from the New York Post:

Serial slugger arrested again hours after release under bail reform law

The homeless man cut loose without bail despite a history of unprovoked street attacks has been busted again — just a few hours after his release, police said Saturday.

Eugene Webb, 26, was arrested Friday night for aggressive panhandling near a bank entrance in Greenwich Village, just one day after he was hauled in for allegedly slugging a 23-year-old woman in the face so hard that two of her teeth were knocked out.

Webb, who police say is homeless, also attacked a second woman near Grand Central Terminal just hours after the Wednesday attack, punching the 35-year-old and kicking the back of her head, prosecutors said.

But despite a long rap sheet of at least four other arrests, Judge Ann Thompson cut the serial slugger loose under the state’s new bail reform regulations at his Friday morning arraignment.

At his arraignment Friday, Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Ashlyn Rich told the judge there was, “clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is fully capable of moving around Manhattan, at will,” and asked that Webb be held on $10,000 cash bail— but he was freed on supervised release.

So this guy is a vagrant who has attacked multiple women, and each time has been arrested and released without bail.

Note that he punched one woman so hard he knocked out some of her teeth, and kicked another woman in the back of the head.

Now for story number two:

‘One-punch killer’s’ charges upgraded from misdemeanor to felony

An alleged gang member initially charged with a misdemeanor assault for killing a man on a Brooklyn sidewalk with a single punch is now facing a felony, The Post has learned. 

Prosecutors presented the upgraded second-degree assault charge to a grand jury sometime last month after The Post reported on the “one-punch loophole” that led to Joshua Hernandez’s initial misdemeanor rap. He was indicted on the more serious charge Dec. 19, court records show.

The Brooklyn DA’s office said it upgraded the charge “based on additional evidence that was recovered.

“We still believe, however, that a legislative fix is needed to address assaults such as this that result in death,” a spokesman said, noting prosecutors’ previous calls for legislation to eliminate the “one-punch loophole.”

Hernandez’s new charge comes with a maximum penalty of seven years behind bars, while the misdemeanor charge carried a one-year max.

Rodriguez suffered the mortal blow on Nov. 17, when Hernandez, a 25-year-old alleged Latin Kings gang member with a rap sheet that includes assaulting a cop, punched him on a Brooklyn sidewalk, police said.

Rodriguez and his female companion had just left the Mezcaleria La Milagrosa before 5 a.m. when Hernandez and his two friends asked the pair for a cigarette. Rodriguez said he didn’t have a smoke and the group moved on, but minutes later Hernandez snuck up from behind, connecting his fist with Rodriguez’s skull, according to Rodriguez’s sister, Pamela Zambrano Gomez, who claimed to have spoken to a witness.

Rodriguez fell straight to the ground, cracking his cranium on the pavement.

The Venezuelan native and aspiring video game developer was rushed to emergency surgery at Bellevue Hospital, where he fell into a coma. He was on a ventilator for four days before Rodriguez’s family made the gut-wrenching decision to take him off of life support.

Legal experts say the misdemeanor is not an unlikely charge for a “one-punch” killing.

“What frightens me the most is the possibility of the system making him go to prison only a year,” Rodriguez’ father, José Zambrano, had told The Post. “Because of a one-punch law.”

So a guy out with his girlfriend gets sucker-punched by a gang member with a long and violent criminal history.

Like many cases I have reported on, he falls hard, hits his head on the concrete, cracks his skull, and as a result of the head trauma, his brain swells and he dies days later.  This is the pattern with one-punch kills.  It’s not the punch that’s generally lethal, it’s the fall and subsequent head injury from hitting the ground.

What makes it worse is that New York City seems to have a very lackadaisical attitude about punching someone to death.

Legal experts say that even if the alleged punch led to Rodriguez’ death, upgrading the assault charge to manslaughter would depend on the very difficult proposition of proving there was an intent to kill.

“Just because the result is something horrific and tragic, doesn’t mean you intended that outcome,” said criminal defense attorney and former Manhattan prosecutor Jeremy Saland.

So in New York City, if a criminal punches someone in the head hard enough for them to fall, crack their skull, and die, but didn’t intend to kill them it’s still only prosecuted as assault.

Gaelic football player Danny McGee died from a single blow outside a Queens bar almost a year to the day before Rodriguez was attacked.

Steven O’Brien pleaded guilty to third-degree misdemeanor assault on Nov. 21, the day Rodriguez died. He was sentenced to six months in jail.

Think about that for a second.  O’Brien killed a man with a punch, but as far as federal law is concerned, isn’t a prohibited person.

The case prompted the Queens District Attorney’s office to call for harsher punishments for one-punch killings.

“We believe that is an inadequate response by society to a death,” said Acting DA John Ryan. “We call upon the Legislature to pass a law making an intentional assault that results in death a felony.”

New York just decriminalized bank robbery, does anybody expect the legislature to actually pass a law that increases punishment for a crime?

Considering New York has bent over backward to ignore all the Jews getting beat up, does anybody think New York will pass a law that puts a minority kid in prison for punching a Jew who then falls down and dies?

No, I’m pretty sure, just like bail reform, a “one-punch kill loophole” is a way of enacting social justice by letting violent criminals go with minimum punishment.

For the rest of the law-abiding citizens of New York City, what it means is that vagrants can go around punching innocent bystanders to death and be let go to walk around without bail.

As long as you only murder people with your fists, the whole of New York City is your consequence free hunting ground.

What should happen is that New Yorkers should arm themselves, and when someone aggressively panhandles them or tries to bum a cigarette, New Yorkers should be ready to shoot to kill in case said asshole takes a swing.

But this is New York we are talking about, so that will never happen.  Instead, more New Yorkers will be punched to death and their attackers will be let go without bail.

 

Spread the love

Ilhan Omar clarifies who her constituents are

Ilhan Omar couldn’t make it any clearer that while she is a member of the US House of Representatives, her constituents are radical Islamists.

At first, she criticized sanctions against Iran, which is trying to obtain a nuclear weapon, while defending sanctions against an allied nation.

Then she seemed to give Iran advice where to strike that would most hurt President Trump directly.

Then, she admitted that it was her job to speak for the Iranian people in Congress.

It’s the job of the Iranian government, to consider the consequences of war with the US.

It should be Omar’s job to speak for the children of American service members killed with Iranian provided weapons.  But no, she’d rather do the job of an Iranian Member of Parliament than an American Representative.

 

Spread the love

That explains a lot…

From the Huffington Post:

Elizabeth Warren’s Skin Care Routine Has Created A Whole New Debate

Presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren and her skin have been featured in thousands of up-close and personal selfies on the campaign trail. Glowing selfies have become a signature trait, alongside her robust energy and “can-do” attitude. But according to a new interview with Cosmo, the Democratic senator from Massachusetts apparently “never” washes her face.

Warren revealed her most controversial policy yet during Cosmo’s “Candidates Come to Cosmo” video series, in which Editor-in-Chief Jessica Pels grills presidential hopefuls on policy, pop culture, and the most burning topic of all, their skin care routines.

As Warren tells it, she “never” washes her face.  Instead, she bathes in human blood.  

“The way to stay vital is to consume the life force of others,” Warren said. 

“There are ancient incantations that allow you to suck the life energy out of a person.  By absorbing that energy during a ritual that involves soaking in the blood of a human sacrifice I am able to remain spry in my 70s, without concerns for diet or exercise.  I learned this from my great-grandmother who was part necromancer.”

Warren then explained, “children make the best victims for sacrifice, they are so full of life energy.” 

While many people might find that controversial, Warren was not worried about how that might affect her poll numbers.

“The children I consume are all the children of empowered single mothers who wanted to have a post-birth abortion.  I am helping to facilitate their right to choose.  This is a very Progressive position.”

When pressed on how she became so at ease with the idea of human sacrifice, Warren spoke about her time as “a lawyer on Wall Street” and getting use to the principle that “there was no amount of human suffering that would stop us from making a buck.”

Warren has apparently been a practitioner of the dark arts for a long time, giving it credit for much of her success. 

“How else could someone as cold and impersonal as myself become so rich and famous, let alone get elected to the Senate as a part-time Harvard professor?  That is the power of the supernatural forces of evil.”

While this might come shocking to many, this is not a secret in Democrat circles.  “Hillary also employed the forces of evil or a politician that unlikeable would have never gotten as far as she did.”

When asked why Hillary failed to get elected, Warren said that it was poor prioritization.  “Hillary tried to use the dark arts to both make herself rich and loved at the same time.  It’s almost impossible to conjure up $400 Million in personal wealth and get people to follow you unquestioningly simultaneously.  She was not strong enough to do it.”

When asked if she was going to do things differently than Hillary, as many people have compared the two politicians, she said she intends to emulate her hero.

“Barack Obama did it correctly.  He entranced the people by magically boosting his charisma.  He didn’t feel the need to make himself wealthy until his Presidency was over.”

Warren also said that President Obama had one advantage that others in her position did not.  “Obama had a Warlock servant, who posed as his wife Michelle.”  

When asked about the way some people might be hesitant to support a party that gains power with the force of evil, Warren’s position is that the cost of moderate voters who might be turned off by the use of dark magic is well worth the benefit to the politicians who use it.

“Democrats in California have used too much dark magic to gain monopoly control of the state that the land itself is cursed.  It’s always on fire, demons walk around freely, and there are feces on the street.”

Most voters in California believe that to be the product of global warming and capitalism.  Warren clarified “that’s what they have been enchanted to believe.  The reality is there is so much dark magic there is it literally raining brimstone and shit.”

Warren says that California is the future of the Democrat party.

“As unhappy as Californians are about the quality of life that comes with living on cursed ground, they still vote overwhelmingly for the Democrats.  If the California Democrats can do that, the concentrated efforts of the DNC should be able to accomplish that at the national level.”

Warren was asked about problems of party unity, which have seemed to plage the Democrats this election cycle, Warren answered “it takes years, decades really, of work to properly harness the dark arts.  Nancy Pelosi is the most powerful witch in the party, and she’s 179 years old.  Then we have to deal with young upstarts like Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez.  She’s passionate, and yes, she consorted with the devil once, but she lacks experience and it shows.  In 40 or 50 years, she might be ready to lead the party.”   

Despite all this, Warren said that Trump is still the biggest threat to the future of the Democrat party.

“We say that he is evil, but it’s really the Democrats that use the dark arts.  His charisma is real charisma, and very hard to enchant people away from that.”

Warren did say that there was still hope for the Democrats to have victory in 2020.

“By harnessing the power of death, we may be able to maledict victory.  We’ve been doing our best to maximize that by encouraging abortion, violent crime, and opioid overdose, and it seems to be working.”

While the debate about dark money in politics is has been acknowledged for years, there has been little mentioned about the use of dark magic in politics, and this has created a whole new debate.

I guess that explains a lot.

Spread the love

Elon Musk is a super-villain

Early last year I watched a video of SpaceX launching a Tesla towards Mars.

I knew I had seen that scene before.

And I said to myself “Elon Musk, that motherfucker is going after the Loc-Nar.”

I didn’t realize at the time, just how much of an evil super-villain genius Elon Musk really was.

Then I watched on November 21st of this year, Elon Musk unveiled his partial-birth-abortion of an electric pickup truck.  The unveiling was a disaster, the bulletproof windows were not.  It was awkward to watch.  Musk looked much less like a Billionaire CEO in command of a game-changing technology than he usually does.

Even I fell for attacking the Cybertruck for being a piece of shit.

How could the guy who created SpaceX allowed such a half-assed launch to occur making him a bit of a laughing stock?

The answer: misdirection like a fucking boss.

The Cybertruck debuted on November 21, 2019, the same day that PlainSite broke this story:

https://twitter.com/PlainSite/status/1197592445812232192

Elon Musk seems to have had employee Martin Tripp swatted because Tripp is a whistleblower in a case against Musk.

Here is the report from the Tweet above, regarding the report of the active shooter and the deputies’ meeting with Tripp, from the Storey County Sheriff’s Office.

I clipped this part out to make it easier to read:

I’m not sure how it is legal for a company to hold a fired employee and interrogate him for hours on end.

Then there is this section snipped from the report of the other responding deputy.

Does it seem odd that it was the director of security for Tesla that made a call about a threat to another location through the internal call center, as opposed to the Gigafactory calling the local police.

Considering that a mass shooting was supposed “possibly take place at any moment,” the threat going from the Gigafactory to the call center to the director to the Sheriff seems to be a lot of time wasted.

According to PlainSite, Musk has a history (evidenced by court documents) of harassing people who cross him.  And by cross him, including people who question his technology or reported on Musk’s unethical behavior.

And this misdirection worked.

Who mentioned anything about an executive-level conspiracy at Tesla to swat a whistleblower with the Stoney County Sheriff when the Cybertruck disaster was the big, flashy Elon Musk news?

That is evil super-villain type shit right there.

Spread the love

Ask me again why I do not respect Hollywood “stars”

And find out about this without the benefit of my morning coffee:

Low tide during a windless summer… for some reason that came to my mind.  That poor woman is not right in the head. First is shoving jade eggs up her cootch and now is selling the smell?

 

Spread the love