Leftist Antisemitism won’t go away anytime soon because they are proud of it

Watching the Democrats bumble-fuck their way through dealing with Antisemitic attacks and the Antisemitism coming from their own side has woken a lot of people up to the Antisemitism on the Left (unfortunately not enough Jews though).

At first, the Left tried to bullshit us that they were not Antisemites.

With overwhelming evidence hitting the news every day, they had to admit to it.  But they couldn’t just apologize for it.  Bigotry is something they are convinced only the Right embraces because bigotry is evil and they believe they are on the side of good.

So instead they rationalize their Antisemitism, and when they do so, they make it clear that they are proud of it.

Lux Alptraum is the working name of a former Gawker employee turned sex blogger, speaker, and sex toy consultant.  She has one of those resumes that makes me wonder why in the shit do people listen to her and how does she make money.

She decided to break down Leftist Antisemitism from the Leftist perspective – with the moral high ground that only a former Gawker employee can have (i.e., none at all).

“See, you awful Righties hate Jews because you are stupid.

We Leftists hate Jews because of a Marxist view of the world where we root for the impoverished minority underclass, and Jews, although they are a minority, are just too rich and successful to deserve our support so instead, they deserve our scorn.  We understand that hating Jews is on its face, wrong because bigotry is wrong.  But we can’t abandon our hatred of the ‘privileged’ which includes rich Jews, so we call the situation ‘complicated.”

“We hate the rich, and that’s good.  Blacks rent property and Jews own property.  It’s not that we hate Jews for being Jews, we hate Jews for being property owners.  It’s just too bad for the Jews that they got caught up in the rich.  Sorry, not sorry.”

“I’m not really calling out anti-Semitism, I’m justifying it on Marxist principles.”

Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it’s enemy action.

If Lux is once, then the Daily Beast is twice and three times for the author and editor who approved this article:

What’s Behind the New Wave of Anti-Semitic Hate?
The suspect in the Monsey, New York, stabbings has some things in common with classic anti-Semitic conspiracists, but the differences between them may be more important.

Tell me, I’d like to know what those differences are.

New York is reeling from a wave of anti-Semitic attacks, and speaking as a Jewish parent who lives in Brooklyn, I can tell you that it’s terrifying.

Not terrifying enough to try and go against the Left and fix it.

It is also confusing. The vast majority of anti-Semitic attacks in this country are carried out by right-wing white supremacists.

Fuck you.  White supremacists, yes.  Right-wing, no.

But most of the recent New York-area attacks have been carried out by people of color expressing very different grievances, or none at all. So is this the same phenomenon, or a different one? Hate, yes, but what kind of hate?

The kind you are going to justify.

The answer is not simple. The recent street violence and acts of terror are based, in part, on anti-Semitic conspiracy theories similar to those on the Right. And yet, it is dangerous and misleading to see this as the same phenomenon, because the social contexts, the dynamics of race, and the relationships to power are all quite different.

“I want to blame the Right for this but it’s being carried out by black people in New York who are clearly not on the Right.  So I’m going to invoke the Right and then say it’s complicated becuase the mantra of our side is ‘minorities can’t be racist’ and I can’t just condemn black Antisemitism as bad.”

For example, on Sunday the FBI found handwritten journals in the home of Grafton Thomas, who last weekend attacked a Hasidic family in the New York suburb of Monsey, indicating an espousal of anti-Semitic “Black Hebrew Israelite” ideology, which holds that Jews are not the true chosen people. (Police also recovered Grafton’s recent internet history, including searches for “zionist temples” and “Why did Hitler hate the Jews.” )

This same ideology apparently motivated the Dec. 10 attack on a kosher grocery store in Jersey City.

As Mark Potok recently discussed in these pages, the Black Hebrew Israelites are a tiny sect that blames Jews for degrading American culture and accuses them of being self-interested moneymakers. Like those of the Nation of Islam, these doctrines of hate are not dissimilar to right-wing anti-Semitic tropes of Jews being foreigners who destroy their host countries for their own enrichment.

“I just can’t condemn a black hate group without invoking the right.  It’s impossible for me to full criticize black people.”

But in these cases, the anti-Semitic themes are sometimes wedded to quasi-progressive concerns about racial justice, or, more broadly, to grievances against Jews as usurious landlords or agents of gentrification.

“When white supremacists say ‘Jews are rich bankers’ that’s simple bigoted Antisemitism.  When blacks say ‘Jews are rich bankers’ that’s a Woke Marxist argument against gentrification.  It’s different, because black people.”

Consider the bilious anti-Semitic outburst by Joan Terrell-Paige who, astonishingly, still sits on the Jersey City Board of Education. (That this bigot is still in office is, itself, an intolerable outrage.)

Well, Al Sharpton’s group is backing her, so she’s not going anywhere anytime soon.  The Kingmaker has spoken.

In a since-deleted Facebook post (screen-captured here), Terrell-Paige said that the “brutes of the jewish community… brazenly came on the property of… Black homeowners and waved bags of money.” She then continued “However we learned 6 rabbis were accused of selling body parts. Where is the truth in these reports?”

If this was published on The Daily Stormer, you would simply condemn it.  But because Terrell-Paige is black…

Notice how Ms. Terrell-Paige’s post—I encourage you to read the whole thing—blends an almost coherent critique of gentrification with a shocking, false conspiracy theory (rabbis selling body parts?) redolent of 800 years of anti-Semitism. (The post also praises the murderers, and implies that all Jews should be held responsible, at penalty of death, for the misconduct of a few bad landlords.)

“I can’t fully condemn her because she mixed her Anstisemitsm with Leftist talking points I agree with.”

This is like making walnut fudge but using dog shit instead of chocolate and telling me that the walnuts are still good to eat if you just pick them out of the shit.

Now, most of the attacks in my hometown have not come with Facebook posts. Last Monday, for example, a man punched a 65-year old man and shouted, “Fuck you, Jew!” That’s not a manifesto; that’s simple hate.

In another incident, recorded on video and posted on Twitter, the assailant says that Jews “created the cult.”

In others, the attackers have been entirely silent.

“Those are from black people so I’m having trouble reconciling that against my ideology.”

And in some cases, there are glimmers of ideology. For example, the Crown Heights riot of 1991 was in part about city resources, housing, gentrification, policing and political power, but also shot through with conspiracy theories and the blaming of all Jews—or, more specifically, all Hasidic Jews—for the misdeeds of a few.

“When the Nazis had Kristallnacht, that was evil.  When Al Sharpton kicked off a Pogrom, that was for good Leftist reasons.”

I’m not defending the Nazis.  I just want to know, has it not ever occurred to these people that the Nazis had their justifications too?  That what they are doing here is exactly the same thing, justifying their Antisemitism by making themselves into the righteous victims striking back at the Jews?

(Of course, it’s worth emphasizing, as strongly as possible, that black anti-Semitic attackers do not represent all black people any more than white anti-Semitic attackers represent all white people. Most white people are not white nationalists, and most black people are not anti-Semites. These attacks say nothing about African-Americans or anti-Semitism in black communities.)

Holy fuck, I think that is the first time I’ve ever seen anyone on the Left say “not all white people are racist.”

This combination of baseless hatred and socio-economic grievance stands in stark contrast to the wordy theoretical manifestoes of white supremacist anti-Semitism. And while some attackers cite conspiracy theories similar to the ones on the nationalist right, such as the Black Hebrew Israelite doctrines noted above, the social contexts and relationships to power are utterly different.

This is where this shit goes to hell.

White supremacists are almost university poor and undereducated.  White supremacists who read The Daily Stormer are not college-educated professionals with good salaries but come from the lower end of the working class.  They are poor whites with few skills, few job prospects, and little income.  Just like the Germans who grew up under the economic destruction of post-WWI Weimar Republic and the hyperinflation of the Papiermark, they blame the Jews for their financial misery.

They blame the “Jewish bankers” for shutting down the local factory killing the town and use that to justify their Antisemitism.

Both poor Antisemitic blacks and poor white-supremacist whites hate the Jews using the same bigoted rationale.  They both feel as though the Jews oppress them financially and that they would be much better off if it weren’t for the Jews.

The difference is that the Left buys that shit from blacks but doesn’t from poor, rural whites.

This does two things.

One: it allows the Left to justify black Antiseitism, and therefore not try and stop it.

Two: it stops the Left from empathizing with poor whites and therefore stops them from trying to fix the underlying problems that allows Antisemitism to metastasize.

This exacerbates all Antisemitism.

While conspiracy-mongering exists on the left and the right, there is no left-wing or African-American equivalent of President Trump, who has freely traded in anti-Semitic stereotypes, sometimes in a joking way (as when he told a group of Jews that they’d never vote to raise their own taxes), sometimes in apparently well-meaning but actually profoundly destructive was, as when he said Jews are primarily loyal to Israel, and sometimes in explicitly harmful ways, as when he and his surrogates blame everything they don’t like on the nefarious George Soros.

I guess he is obliviously unaware of Al Sharpton or Louis Farrakhan or Ilhan Omar or Keith Ellison.

After all, the notorious anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan may be the leader of the Nation of Islam, but Trump is the leader of the free world. 

That’s bullshit.  Farrakhan has been spewing his shit since 1977.  He’s had a much more expansive reach in his 43 years than Trump has in his three.

Indeed, Trump’s contribution to our conspiracy-fevered culture is broader than specifically anti-Semitic conspiracies. For example, regarding the 2016 election alone, Trump has claimed, baselessly, that it was rigged (even though he won anyway), that millions of people voted illegally in it, that Ukraine (not Russia) interfered with it, and that there are still important email servers floating around out there that we have to get our hands on.

When you play with fire like this, vulnerable populations get burned. Especially Jews.

Goddamn that is some erroneous bullshit used to downplay black Antisemites like Farrakhan and blame Trump for Antisemitism he hasn’t shown.

Finally, right-wing anti-Semitism is connected to right-wing political ideology and power.

That Leftist “power plus prejudice” is the ugliest fucking idea in the 21st century.

“Black Antisemitism isn’t as bad because blacks don’t have power.”

Tell that to the dead or wounded Jews in New York.  I don’t really think they care about socioeconomic power dynamics when they are being beaten with bricks, stabbed with machetes, or shot.

Obviously, most conservatives are not anti-Semitic. But anti-Semitism often exists on a nationalist continuum from populists who traffic in anti-Semitic stereotypes, like Trump or Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, to outright anti-Semites like Orbán’s hero, Miklós Horthy.

This is a bullshit scale comparing Trump to Orban.

There is a reason the Pittsburgh attacker was frustrated that Trump wasn’t anti-Semitic enough.

“Trump is a Jew-hater causing violence but not enough of a Jew-hater which also causes violence.  Either way, Trump is responsible.”

And in terms of scale, there is simply no comparison between right-wing anti-Semitism, which arguably stretches into the White House itself (if not Trump, then some of his recent advisers), and the fringe sects, street violence, and bigotry found among small segments of the African-American community.

Again, this means nothing to the Jews being wounded or killed in New York and New Jersey.

When the police look for somebody who stabs a Jew, they don’t start at the White House and work their way down the power dynamics.

It cannot be a coincidence that the rise in anti-Semitism coincides with the rise in Trumpism. According to the FBI, anti-Semitic hate crimes jumped 37 percent in 2017, compared with a 3 percent increase in 2016 and 9 percent in 2015. (According to the ADL, the rise was 60 percent.)

Ummm… the rise in Antisemitism also parallels the rise in Woke activism and identity politics on the Left, and the number of Leftists who gained following on Twitter and tumblr.

The rise in Antisemitic incidents on College campuses perfectly parallels the rise of intersectional Palestinian support in academia.

Don’t forget, it was the Women’s March and Dyke March that hosted Leftist Jew-haters like Linda Sarsour and kicked out the Jews from their organizations.

The dark turn to ethno-nationalism is a massive, global phenomenon. As horrific as the attacks in Brooklyn, Jersey City, and Monsey are, they are a footnote to this giant, global tidal wave.

Compared to the Right, around the world, the problem is Muslims and Leftsists.

On one level, yes, hate is hate. And hatred of Jews is hatred of Jews.

But…

But to eradicate anti-Semitism, we must understand it—and right now, when it comes to this devastating new wave of attacks, we don’t.

Since you keep justifying it for black people as grievances against gentrification, you won’t eradicate it.

The Left has fostered Marxist class hatred into the black community.  Typical Antisemitic stereotypes have mixed with the Marxism to create a Jew-hating ideological Bouillabaisse.

Since the Left endorses the Marxism, they can’t fully condemn the Jew-hatred so instead try to explain why their Antisemitism is more enlightened than the knuckle-dragging Antisemitism of white supremacism, which they wrongly associate with being on the Right.

Because of this, they will never be able to get rid of the Antisemitism on their side, because they don’t want to.

Spread the love

Fantastic movie on Disney+

Last night the wife and I watched Togo on Disney+

It was absolutely fantastic.

The movie is based on the real story of the 1925 Diphtheria run to Nome, in which a relay of dogsleds brought diphtheria antitoxin to Nome, Alaska, from Nenana because a blizzard made it too cold and hazardous to fly the antitoxin in.

Many people might know this as the story of Balto, either because of the 1995 animated movie or the statue in Central Park.

Balto was the lead dog of the final leg of the relay and delivered the antitoxin to None, so was the dog hyped by the press.  Togo and his musher ran the longest and most dangerous stretch of the relay, covering a total of 264 miles.

It got a little dusty in the living room towards the end.

It really is an excellent movie, worth the cost of the Disney+ subscription (especially if you get it free for a year from Verizon).  I’ll be honest, between this and The Mandalorian, I think the best stuff that Disney is doing is not the mass market popcorn garbage it launches in theaters but the stuff it drops on its streaming service.

Spread the love

VoteVets confirms some of my fears

A short while back I wrote a post The coming US Junta or O’Sullivan’s Law and the US Military.

While I agree that there are many patriotic Americans who join the military to serve this country and would defy any order that harms its citizens, I don’t think that describes our entire military.

Case in point, Vote Vets.

VoteVets is a Progressive political organization, emphasis on Progressive.

If you have not been following foreign affairs, protesters (what CNN calls violent Islamists) are storming the American embassy in Baghdad, with the backing of Iran, waving the flags of Iranian backed Islamist terrorist organizations.

This is how VoteVets responded to this news.

At Benghazi, four Americans, two of who were former Navy SEALs, were killed.

A Progressive veterans organization is giddy with the idea of American diplomatic personnel and servicemen just to for Trump to have some egg on his face.

Is this the esprit de corps of the US military?

What sort of veterans say, let alone think, “I hope my comrades overseas get killed to make Bad Orange Man look bad.”

What do you think such soldiers would do on the battlefield?

How quickly would these servicemen turn on civilians on the other side of the political aisle?

I don’t need the military to be a bastion of GOP voting Conservatives.  But “anything embarrasses Bad Orange Man, even the deaths of US troops at the hands of terrorists” is not an attitude that should exist in the ranks.

This is no different than the anti-gunners who are disappointed by a CCW taking out a shooter in a Texas church because a high body count mass shooting helps their anti-gun activism.

This does not bode well for the military.

Spread the love

It’s like they don’t know what really happened

As seen on the internet:

Seven guns drawn by permit holders and not one crossfire shootout.

No innocents killed by police.

This demonstrably did not happen.

Still, they are going with it.

I love the “what if” game.

Also, this person only has a simple mind.

Who needs facts when you have an agenda to push?

Spread the love

Tom Nichols proves why his “expertise” killed expertise

Tom Nichols was one of those special “conservatives” that was allowed to write for Leftist magazines like The Atlantic.  Meaning that he was not a Conservative, but a Liberal who didn’t have a Che shirt in college.

He’s an author and academic who specializes in national security and Russian affairs.

Since the election of Donald Trump, he took to writing shit like this:

Why this Never Trump ex-Republican will vote for almost any 2020 Democratic nominee
I’m good with anyone who is mentally stable and in no way sympathetic or beholden to a hostile foreign power. That’s it. Policy just doesn’t matter.

Because that is a totally rational and principled position to take.  Especially in the wake of multiple investigations that showed there was no Trump collusion with foreign powers.

That a man who teaches at the Naval War College on the topic of Russian affairs bought into the “Russian collusion” narrative should be a total disqualifier from that job and everything else in his life.

That he was hired to teach at the Naval War College is everything wrong about what Obama and his appointed military leadership did to the US military.

He wrote a book called The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters.

This is how Harvard Magazine describes the book, written by one of the school’s professors (because of course, he teaches there).

People were no longer merely uninformed, Nichols says, but “aggressively wrong” and unwilling to learn. They actively resisted facts that might alter their preexisting beliefs. They insisted that all opinions, however uninformed, be treated as equally serious. And they rejected professional know-how, he says, with such anger. That shook him.

Skepticism toward intellectual authority is bone-deep in the American character, as much a part of the nation’s origin story as the founders’ Enlightenment principles. Overall, that skepticism is a healthy impulse, Nichols believes. But what he was observing was something else, something malignant and deliberate, a collapse of functional citizenship. “Americans have reached a point where ignorance, especially of anything related to public policy, is an actual virtue,” he would write in the preface to The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Expertise and Why It Matters, which was published by Oxford last year and quickly became a bestseller. “To reject the advice of experts is to assert autonomy, a way for Americans to insulate their increasingly fragile egos from ever being told they’re wrong about anything.” Further down the page, he would add: “I’m worried.”

Here is the problem with Nichols’ assertion.

He’s a fucking narcissistic idiot.

Nichols graduated from Boston University, the same school that gave us the idiotic socialist, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.  He teaches at Harvard, the same school that hired Bradley “Chelsea” Manning as a digital security Fellow (later rescinded due to public outcry), and gave a full ride to David Hogg.

It was kids at Harvard that forced the school to turn away Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh as a visiting professor because the students felt unsafe because of the dubious allegations against him.

It was also the Ivy League MBA’s that crashed the housing market with their unethical fuckery and legal thievery hiding it behind B-School jargon.

(If you’ve never seen The Big Short, you should.  Just don’t drink while you’re doing it or you’ll end up in your garage trying to build a guillotine.)

The problem that Nichols laments is a result of the democratization of information, or as Reason TV puts it The 2010s: When the Media Lost Their Gatekeepers.

The “experts” were wrong about almost everything.  Everything they touched turned to shit.

They crashed the housing market and the economy and told us that Hillary Clinton would be President.

The “experts” do not have expertise based on an analysis of the empirical evidence.  They have their prejudices reinforced from inside their elite echo chambers.

The public has come to realize that and doesn’t want to listen to these idiots and assholes anymore.

Case in point, his opinion on CCW:

Even when I was a Republican, I never understood people who measure freedom by how many of us walk around with guns. This is a cultural change, the spreading of the gun culture from a corner of the GOP to the entire conservative moment. /1

The spread of gun worship is conservative virtue-signaling. Never liked it when I was among my old tribe, and it’s gotten worse as “conservatives” try to figure out new markers for what makes them “patriots” now that they’ve had to sell out so much actual patriotism to Trump. /2

When I was a kid, everyone had a gun. Most of my neighbors. Teachers. (Lots more veterans in those days.) But it was not a culture of “I went for a coffee and wore my gun because damn it, I’m an American.” My GOP voting family and friends never talked about guns. Why would we? /3

Among the working class guys who all owned guns, talking a lot about guns was weird. You had them, it was your right, you left it at that. We didn’t measure our sense of worth by whether we were going to go face down the gangbangers around our church in the 70s. /4

I’m uncomfortable with people who worship guns and feel the need to have them nearby 24/7 not because of guns, but because I’m uncomfortable with people who worship guns. That this is now a litmus test for “conservatives” tells you something sad about conservatism. /5x

He was an Acela Corridor Republican, from a suburb of Springfield, Massachusets.  He has no knowledge of gun culture from the South or Midwest, but he will criticize us and lecture us and tell us why we are weird.

“Those dirty southerners, making being a Republican something unbecoming for a Harvard man.”

You can feel the anti-Southern and anti-Midwestern bigotry drip from him.

It’s not that he hates guns.  Guns that are possessed by and under the lock and key of the US Government.  He just hates gun owners who have a desire for the right to self-defense.

And he wonders why nobody outside his bubble gives a shit about his opinion?

Because his opinion is the products of a lack of brain oxygenation from him sniffing his own farts too much.

The surge in gun culture among the GOP was the result of the Brady Bill and AWB.  They kicked that hornet’s nest when they tried to turn the rest of the US into “The Republic of New Yorkafornia.”

And again, it was something pushed by “experts” that didn’t do one iota of what it was claimed to do.

His entire argument is:

“Why won’t you let me beat you down, degrade you, and take away your rights, anymore?  I teach at an Ivy League, I know better than you, so you need to shut up and learn your place.”

There is a reason there is a “death of expertise,” “experts” like Nichols’ proved why it needed to die.

Spread the love

Shannon Watts says concealed carry CAUSES church shootings

According to Shannon Watts, the reason that a crazy man went into a church and killed two people was that Texas expanded concealed carry to include places of worship.

This applies only to concealed carry, with a permit.  Not a guy with a criminal record and a history of mental illness carrying a shotgun under his trench coat.

That difference is not important to an anti-gun zealot like Watts.

I wonder what the Muslims in Christchurch think about that, considering that New Zealand had, by American standards, pretty strict gun laws even before that shooting.

And again, she focuses only on shootings.  Looking up “church bombing” shows that for most of the rest of the world, the most dangerous thing a Christian can do is go to Church in a country with a large Muslim population.  Sri Lanka, the Philippines, Turkey, and Egypt have strong gun laws (on the books, if not in practice), that doesn’t stop the killing.

But this tweet implies the same thing as her last, that expanded concealed carry caused the White Settlement shooting.

It didn’t.  The shooting was cut short by a person with a concealed carry permit who was armed because of this change in Texas’ law.

So Watts has to lie about that too.

Jack Wilson is a hero, but this narrative is bullshit.  Wilson was a Hood County Reserve Deputy Sheriff from 1980-1986.  So for six years, back in the early 1980s, he volunteered for 20 hours per month of helping out in a rural county in central Texas, that had a population of about 20,000 people.

His skills and ability with a pistol in that moment of crisis were entirely due to his time as a civilian firearms instructor, teaching the CHL class that she bemoans in her Tweet.

The “highly trained” person with a gun is as if not more likely to be a CCW holder than a LEO, unless the LEO is a “gun guy” who likes to shoot on his own time.

Furthermore, the reality of the shooting showed just how wrong the Time article was.  Despite seven people with CCW drawing their guns, there was no confused shootout that increased the body count.  The reason that most mass shootings are not stopped by CCW holders is that they are just in the wrong place at the wrong time to do much to stop it.

There was at least one armed citizen at Cielo Vista Mall near the Walmart in El Paso during the shooting. Army Pfc. Glendon Oakley said in interviews that he was carrying a licensed handgun and drew it when he heard the gunshots on Saturday. “That’s what you do,” he told the military publication Task & Purpose. “You pull your gun, you find cover and you figure out what to do next.”  But, he said he didn’t see the shooter and so instead focused on rescuing as many children as he could in the immediate aftermath of the shooting.

That’s right.  If I’m at Walmart with my CCW, I’m not going to try and cross the store, hunting for the bad guy.  That’s for the cops with long guns and body armor.

But because these CCW holders did not stop mass shooters, that is reason enough to limit concealed carry.

Again, this is the Leftist’s childish idea that anything that isn’t perfect must be banned.

So she fretts about other states also allowing Church CCW.

Yep, we Alabama rednecks like the idea of being able to protect ourselves,  especially in our Churches – and Synagogues.  Ever since the Sutherland Springs church shooting, gun ranges have been filled with classes for volunteer church guards.  My only complaint is that I haven’t seen any other members of the local Jewish population enrolled.

But her dishonestly doesn’t end there.

We don’t know how this guy got his gun, but that has never mattered to Watts.

That she appealed to Brian Stelter of CNN, probably one of the most dishonest people on the most dishonest media network to be the arbiter of fairness shows you just how biased she is.

Of course, she wants to retreat to the home of the disastrous Parkland Town Hall two-hour hate, that have disgraced Sheriff Scott Israel a platform to defend is ineptitude.

Everything she said was wrong and distorted.  Her cause is not righteous, so she lies.

 

Spread the love

Leftist commits homicide to spite the NRA, anti-gunners amplify his message

This would probably be bigger news if the Monsey Hanukkah Stabbing and White Settlement Chruch Shooting hadn’t eclipsed it.

Husband allegedly shoots and kills wife and pets Thursday morning west of Bellingham

A woman was allegedly shot and killed by her husband in their home west of Bellingham Thursday morning, Whatcom County Sheriff Bill Elfo told The Bellingham Herald.

When deputies arrived, they found a 58-year-old woman dead from an apparent gunshot wound, Elfo said. The woman’s 56-year-old husband was also found inside the apartment with a self-inflicted gunshot wound and he was taken to a local hospital, Elfo said.

The identities of the pair have not been released, pending notification of family, Elfo said.

Deputies also found a dog and cat dead from gunshot wounds, Elfo said.

A man killed his wife, her pets, and attempted to kill himself.  This is horrible and sad and tragic.

But it gets worse.

Man accused of fatally shooting Bellingham principal may have admitted it on Twitter

The Bellingham man accused of fatally shooting his wife, who was a Bellingham elementary school principal, and their two pets Thursday morning may have admitted to killing his family in Twitter replies to the National Rifle Association, the President of the United States and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

While the Twitter account belonging to Kevin Heimsoth could not be verified by The Bellingham Herald or others at McClatchy, a number of aspects point to it belonging to Kevin Heimsoth: The account is associated with email accounts and phone numbers that belong to him; the account associated with Lynn Heimsoth followed this account; she retweeted the account at least once.

Here is a capture of the Tweet:

He also blamed Senator Mitch McConnell as well.

His history shows that he was a raging anti-Trump Leftist.

This is clearly an unhinged man.  That he chose to confess to the murder he committed and use that to blame the NRA and Republicans shows a level of personal disturbance that is off the charts.

And guess to decided to amplify his message?

This is grotesque, and some perverse sort of martyrdom.

There is no other way to describe it.

Watts and Guttenberg are now cheering on premeditated murder committed by anti-gun activists if they spite the NRA.

“I murdered my wife so that the government can take your rights away” is next level evil and the anti-gun activist industry is endorsing it.

This is the level they will stoop to get at us, because it’s not about gun safety, it’s about hating gun owners.

Spread the love