The Daily Mail reports on the push to normalize pedophilia

A buddy sent me this story.

A few years ago I would have said that Left trying to legalize and normalize pedophilia was a crack-pot, tinfoil hat, crazy idea.  Now I cant deny it

I have written about this in the past being facilitated by the radicals in the LGBT community glorifying pubescent drag queens.

That is not the only nexus for the normalization of pedophilia, this story comes out of the British public schools.

Children as young as SIX are to be given compulsory self-touching lessons that critics say are sexualising youngsters

Children as young as six are being taught about touching or ‘stimulating’ their own genitals as part of classes that will become compulsory in hundreds of primary schools.

Some parents believe the lessons – part of a controversial new sex and relationships teaching programme called All About Me – are ‘sexualising’ their young children.

It most certainly fucking is.

My son is five going on six.  This is not something that he needs to know about at this age at all.

There is no reason what so ever to teach this to kids for whom “playing with yourself” is being alone in a bedroom playing with Legos or dolls.

We know that children exposed to sexual acts at a young age are traumatized for the rest of their lives. So all this will do is traumatize more children.

This needs to be stopped now and the bureaucrats who thought this up need to removed from civil society.

Personally, if I ever met someone and asked them what their job is, and their reply was “I teach six-year old to masturbate” I’m going to be spending the rest of my day disposing of a body and any incriminating evidence in a swamp.

 

Spread the love

News from the Swamp on an AWB

From Fox News:

Sparks fly at assault-weapons ban hearing on Capitol Hill, ex-cop vows she would ‘not comply’ 

A former police officer made a bold proclamation during a congressional hearing Wednesday regarding a proposed assault-weapons ban: she would not comply.

Dianna Muller, who served in the Tulsa Police Department for 22 years and is the founder of gun advocacy group The DC Project, was among the witnesses at the House Judiciary Committee hearing. The session on an otherwise contentious issue flew largely under the radar amid the Trump-Ukraine controversy and Democrats’ impeachment push. But reflecting the gun control divide in the country — amid a spate of deadly mass shootings that prompted renewed calls for strict laws — Muller said that such a ban would force lawful gun owners to either give up their arms or become criminals.

“Please don’t legislate the 150 million people just like me into being criminals. It has happened. You’ve already done it,” Muller said, referring to the Trump administration’s ban on bump stocks, the devices that use a semi-automatic weapon’s recoil to make it rapidly fire like an automatic. “I was a bump stock owner, and I had to make a decision: do I become a felon, or do I comply?”

Should the government pass an assault-weapons ban, Muller declared, “I will not comply.”

If precedent for non-compliance for every other confiscatory gun or magazine ban enacted at the state level holds up, neither will at least 97% of other gun owners.

Muller and others at the hearing focused on the practicality of a ban, pointing out what they claimed were mainly “cosmetic” differences between weapons such as the AR-15 and standard semi-automatic hunting rifles. This issue was also raised by Heritage Foundation senior legal policy analyst Amy Swearer when Rep.Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., went down the line of witnesses asking if they believed hunting rifles should be banned if they are semi-automatic.

Swearer said no, stating that there was no difference in the mechanics or function of an “assault weapon” or a semi-automatic hunting rifle.

Heritage posted the video of that testimony and it is awesome.

Dayton, Ohio Mayor Nan Whaley, who recalled the recent mass shooting in her city, did not give a definitive answer to Sensenbrenner’s question, nor did Dr. Alejandro Rios Tovar, a trauma surgeon who treated victims of the attack in El Paso, Texas. Charlottesville, Va., Chief of Police RaShall Brackney indicated she was in favor of a ban on “any weapon that could be used to hunt individuals.”

Rep. David Cicilline, D-R.I., countered the idea of a hunting rifle ban by referring to his assault-weapon ban bill. Cicilline said that more than 200 weapons are exempt from the bill, so there is really no issue of eliminating hunting rifles.

That is until they decide that your long-range hunting rifle is a people hunting sniper rifle.  Then it will be banned.

Swearer also noted that some features like barrel shrouds enhance the safety of a weapon for its user. But David Chipman, senior policy adviser at the Giffords Law Center, raised a counterpoint noting that a barrel shroud could allow a shooter to get a better grip on a weapon “in a way that would increase your ability to spray fire and kill more people” without burning their hand.

Which is utter horse-shit.

Congress and the Trump administration have been in talks for weeks regarding possible gun legislation, but discussion of taking away guns that are currently legal has led to criticism from both parties. After 2020 Democratic hopeful Beto O’Rourke declared during a debate, “Hell yes, we are going to take your AR-15, AK-47,” Cicilline said, “That message doesn’t help.” President Trump said that O’Rourke was making it “much harder” to reach a deal on gun legislation with that sort of rhetoric.

Beto is going to outsell Obama on AR-15’s.

Trump’s focus when it comes to gun control has mainly been on background checks. The White House was also circulating a one-page document on Capitol Hill detailing a possible gun background-check proposal that would require private sellers – not just licensed vendors – to conduct background checks for all advertised sales, though Attorney General Bill Barr said Trump has not yet made a “firm decision” on what he ultimately will support.

An August USA Today poll showed that most American voters support increased background checks, with 85 percent of Republican voters supporting background checks for all gun sales. Presently, only federally licensed vendors are required to conduct background checks, allowing private individuals to sell without them under what has been referred to as the “gun show loophole.”

Give regular people access to NICS and no registration and call it a day.  The Democrats get to say they passed UBC’s, the burden on law-abiding gun owners is marginal, call it a win-win and thank your lucky stars it’s not worse than that.

White House Deputy Press Secretary Hogan Gidley told Fox News last week that he expected an announcement on new gun legislation “very soon.” Gidley said Trump wanted to make sure that any new laws would address actual problems and not just be “feel-good legislation.”

But the Democrats’ impeachment push could complicate matters. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who had resisted impeachment, announced Tuesday that an impeachment inquiry would be launched. Reflecting how policy debates could take a back seat, Pelosi said in private meetings with lawmakers that Trump called her to discuss gun legislation, but she soon changed the subject to his phone call with the Ukrainian president in which they discussed investigating Joe Biden, which stoked the latest calls for impeachment.

This is the effect of Stage 5 TDS.  I can’t complain too much about it because I am happy to watch the Democrats sink any attempted gun control by pivoting towards impeachment every other minute, thereby alienating the Republicans and getting any sport of bipartisan support for it.

It’s all mess up on the Hill.  The only good news is that the Democrats are so hell-bent for leather on nailing Trump on something that they are scuttling their own drive for strict gun control.

Spread the love

Portland Bans Urinals (Updated)

Update: I misread the article and the total mentioned for remodeling applies to the whole building and not just the bathrooms. However I do believe $13 would not be an incredible sum to spend on bathroom remodeling for the whole building, specially when we are talking government. It will probably be more.


The city of Portland (where else) is now banning urinals in city-owned buildings and spending taxpayer money to remove them. The first urinal-free building is appropriately called The Portland Building, where countless paper-shuffling city bureaucrats congregate to waste oxygen and demand pay raises.

The City of Portland banned urinals in the remodeled Portland Building.

The total remodel will cost taxpayers $195,000,000. A spokeswoman said she did not have a break out on how much the bathroom work cost.

She also said no one from the city was available to talk about banning the urinals.

In an email to employees last February, Chief Administrative Officer Tom Rinehart wrote:

“We will continue to have gender-specific (male and female) multi-stall restrooms that are readily available to any employee that prefers to use one. But, there will be no urinals in any restroom in the building. This will give us the flexibility we need for any future changes in signage. I am convinced that this is the right way to ensure success as your employer, remove arbitrary barriers in our community, and provide leadership that is reflective of our shared values.”

Portland Bans Urinals In Public Buildings – Out of Respect to the City’s “Shared Values”

This is The Portland Building:

According to what I found online, it is 15 stories high and the business of the city of Portland is run from it.

Let’s go back again to that number: $195 million to renew bathrooms so they can be ‘woke” and “reflective of shared values” of the Portland community. That comes to $13 million per floor so men can’t pee standing up.

One of the woes Portland authorities keep complaining about is the extensive Homeless (read addicts) that plague their streets and they keep bitching about lacking money to house. So I went to a commercial Real State website and tried to find out what could I get in the manner of apartment buildings for $13 million:. The first building is this one:

It has apartments of different capacities, but the total of bedrooms is 80.  You can put two people per bedroom and house 160 homeless for $7,950,000.

Next we have this excellent opportunity:

All the units have 2 bedrooms which means 40 rooms capable of housing 80 more homeless.

And we close with this charming offering:

14 units with 2 bedrooms each which means can house a total of 56 homeless from the rigors of weather and danger in the streets of Portland.

The total amount to comfortably house 296 homeless on properties that could be owned by the city: $ 12,700,000.

For the money that the City is wasting to knock down the handful of urinals of one lonesome floor in The Portland Building, they could have bought three apartment buildings that could house almost three hundred of the homeless they swear they care so much about.

Madness.

Hat Tip Robert E.

PS: And don’t forget every apartment as a functioning kitchen and bathroom and I imagine some sort of Living room/ Dinning Room area.

Spread the love

When Electrical Cars meet reality.

FREMONT (CBS SF) – A Tesla electric patrol car by the Fremont Police ran low on electricity in the middle of a pursuit, after the department said someone forgot to plug the vehicle into a charger.

According to officials, the officer was pursuing a vehicle headed down to the South Bay when the car began to run low on battery power.

“Just slowed down to six miles of battery on the Tesla, so I may lose it here in a sec,” the officer said, according to police radio transmissions. “If someone else is able, can they maneuver into the number one spot?”

Fremont Police Tesla Near-Dead Battery Forces Officer Off Pursuit

I know, you also gave a chuckle about the idiocy of having a Tesla doing real vehicular work and police work in particular.  Now, understand that the location of the incident being the San Francisco area, there are politicians that would like to see every government vehicle be a “Zero Emissions” vehicle and if they get their way, it will be a dangerous thing. Imagine an ambulance with your loved one inside on the way to the ER having to pull over and request help because they are running out of juice. It will be Virtue Signaling Madness.

I do believe that cars in the future will be electric. The prospect of having a vehicle with 4 computer-controlled direct drive DC motors delivering power directly to each wheel will be awesome. But we get our power from a set of batteries that are not only limited by a short capacity but add unnecessary weight to the vehicle, the electric car will be nothing more than a political posturing piece of machinery.  We need a cheap, on-demand source of inside-the-car generated electricity to finally take over the internal combustion engine.

One can dream.

 

Spread the love

Florida: Rich Democrat wife SWATs somebody who she did not like.

So via The Silicon Graybeard I get to read in Ammoland the story of Peter Van Antwerpen, a resident of Weston who was SWATed after he posted a meme that apparently was insulting to Beth Jaffe, the wife of Weston city commissioner Bryon Jaffe.

Byron and Beth Jaffe

Commenting about the Oh-so-rich city of Weston joining a lawsuit against the State of Florida’s preemption of gun laws, Mr. Van Antwerpen posted a meme of the famous Charles Heston “From my dead cold hands” and mentioned three people, one of them Beth’s husband.

According to the case file, the one who dropped an email to Broward Sheriffs’ Office was dear Beth who seems to be hardcore democrat and anti gun.

Hillary girl.
And Brady Follower!

and to certify her Democrat creds, she was involved in a small and intimate soiree thrown for Mayor Andrew Gillum back in October 2018 while he was doing his run for the governorship of Florida.  And I am talking intimate with people with very deep pockets.

 

Some expensive chairs, no Ikea or Walmart.

If the amounts correspond to individual contributions, Gillum went home that night with close to a million bucks just on the people listed in the flyer.

And as much as I hate that they are doing Red Flags & SWATting for stupid stuff like this, the silver lining is this is evidence to take to the State Supreme Courts and SCOTUS itself if necessary.

I believe Mr. Van Antwerpen should seek some sort of legal respite against dear Beth and certainly humiliate the living daylights out of her and hubby for such a clear abuse of power.

Spread the love

Friends Don’t Let Friends Open Carry – Greg Ellifritz

The need to troll by yours truly is strong, but the article is on point.  Please read it all, including the incidents’ list at the end of the article.


It’s no secret that I’m not a fan of open carry (carrying an unconcealed handgun or long gun in public).  Except in a hunting context or in very rural areas where one is unlikely to encounter another human, I generally think it’s a poor decision to carry openly.  Too many bad things can happen.  I’ve explored some of those issues in my article The Perils of Open Carry.

My friend Spencer Keepers summed up the issue of open carry in the best way that I’ve heard: “I support the right, not the practice.”  I agree with him 100%.

Not everyone feels the same way I do.  Some continually tout open carry as a way to educate the populace and a way to provide a visible deterrent against crime.  In my experience, open carry does neither.

Friends Don’t Let Friends Open Carry – Greg Ellifritz

Spread the love