The Definition of Rich: Part Two.

When you ask a socialist “how much money does a person need to have for them to be part of the ‘evil rich?’”

The answer is always “one more dollar than I have.”

J. Kb’s post nails it in more ways than one.

Something I learned while involuntarily finding myself and my family in three days of rioting in Venezuela and if you were in L.A. after Rodney King, you saw it too: Looters never go too far.

I did not live in the fancy part of town and if we had any kind of railroad system, we would have been perilously close to the wring side of the tracks. But contrary to what the Left kept promising, the poor and the indigent did not descend into the rich neighborhoods and invaded the homes of the filthy rich. Nope, they attacked the neighbor they perceived had more stuff than they did. They remembered that three houses down, they got a brand new color TV not three months ago and went after it. Or that the guy buys beer by the several cases and they went in and “confiscated” it. And the little corner bodega that was the only place to buy milk and bread nearby? Sure as shit the owners re rich; they cleaned it out.

My family place was untouched. It seems that a couple of cases of Molotov cocktails and a freak patrolling with a shotgun was enough deterrent to seek less aggressive targets.  Socialists preaching the Revolution to the poor simply believe they are not targets because they [preach the “good word.” It is always fun to see the face of surprise and terror when they become plucked out of their goods even if they are meager by Upper Crust Standard.

There always is somebody poorer than you for whom you a re rich.

Spread the love

The definition of “rich”

I saw this Tweet by Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and it is beautiful.

 

She ran her campaign on and got elected to office on wanting punitive taxation of the rich.

Now as a member of the United States House of Representatives, she earns a salary of $174,000 per year.  That puts her in the top 3% income bracket for earners in the United States.

Now she realizes that all her policies are going to bite her right in her shapely 3%’er ass.

So now she has to redefine rich to being more than what she earns as a Congresswoman.

So how much is rich enough to get taxed to death?

 

More than she is going to be able to make on a Congresswoman’s salary with the potential for any book deals or speaking fees.

When you ask a socialist “how much money does a person need to have for them to be part of the ‘evil rich?'”

The answer is always “one more dollar than I have.”

It never fails.

Spread the love

The Pubic Wars

I’m sorry, I just couldn’t help myself with the title.

The idea for this post came from a story I heard on NPR about the increase in wife kidnapping in China.  I started to look into the situation, because I was curious, and what I see has the potential to be terrifying.

Let’s begin at the beginning.

From the South China Morning Post:

Too many men: China and India battle with the consequences of gender imbalance

Nothing like this has happened in human history. A combination of cultural preferences, government decree and modern medical technology in the world’s two largest countries has created a gender imbalance on a continental scale. Men outnumber women by 70 million in China and India.

The consequences of having too many men, now coming of age, are far-reaching: beyond an epidemic of loneliness, the imbalance distorts labour markets, drives up savings rates in China and drives down consumption, artificially inflates certain property values and parallels increases in violent crime, trafficking or prostitution in a growing number of locations.

Those consequences are not confined to China and India, but reach deep into their Asian neighbours and distort the economies of Europe and the Americas. Barely recognised, the ramifications of too many men are only starting to come into sight.

“In the future, there will be millions of men who can’t marry, and that could pose a very big risk to society,” warns Li Shuzhuo, a leading demographer at Xian Jiaotong University, in Xian, Shaanxi province.

Out of China’s population of 1.4 billion, there are nearly 34 million more males than females – more than the entire population of Malaysia – who will never find wives and only rarely have sex. China’s official one-child policy, in effect from 1979 to 2015, was a huge factor in creating this imbalance, as millions of couples were determined that their child should be a son.

Look at that number again, 34 million men who will never find a wife in China.

From The Guardian:

‘My parents say hurry up and find a girl’: China’s millions of lonely ‘leftover men’

Official state media put the male-to-female ratio at 136:100 among unmarried people born since the 1980s. Professor Jin Tiankui, an influential sociologist in China’s policy-making circle, predicts that by 2020 there will be 30 million more men than women in the 24–40 age bracket.

Liu and Jin blame their lack of romantic success on their low social status as migrant workers from rural provinces. The state says there are about 278 million others like them, the backbone of the country’s wildly successful manufacturing, construction and service industries. They embody the nation’s most intractable problems of inequality – loneliness included.

The law of supply and demand is a natural law.  It applies to just about everything in life.  When there is a surplus of men, the lower quality ones have little value.  This means that the most lonely men are going to be poor, working class, and rural.

Keep this part in mind, we are going to get back to it.

From The Economist:

Demand for wives in China endangers women who live on its borders

HUONG was only 15 when she went out to meet a friend in Lao Cai, a city in northern Vietnam on the Chinese border (see map). She thought she would be gone a few hours, but it was three years before she managed to return home.

From the Lilly:

‘I’m too tired to cry’: The Laotian girls who are kidnapped to become child brides

The practice of “bride theft” is widespread among the Hmong population in Southeast Asia. In Vietnam, there have been frequent recent reports of Hmong girls who are kidnapped and trafficked across the border into southern China, and evidence has emerged of similar behaviors within the Hmong diaspora in America too.

From Time:

A Shortage of Women in China Has Led to the Trafficking of ‘Brides’ From Myanmar, Says a Report

Authorities on both sides of the border have failed to stop the trafficking of hundreds of women from Myanmar to China, says a new report released by Human Rights Watch (HRW) on Thursday.

The 112-page report, titled Give Us a Baby and We’ll Let You Go: Trafficking of Kachin ‘Brides’ from Myanmar to China, documents anecdotal evidence from 37 victims of the trafficking trade who later escaped, and several families of trafficking victims. The women, originating from Myanmar’s northern Shan and Kachin States, were typically sold for between $3,000 to $13,000 after being lured across the border by the promise of good jobs.

Note the title of the report “Give Us a Baby and We’ll Let You Go.”

China still has a very traditional culture, especially in rural areas.  The idea of the bachelor life is anathema to them.  For a man to have value he must have a family, a wife, and definitely a child.

In much of China, women are still regarded somewhat as property.  Men are still required to pay a bride price.  With the shortage of women, it has literally caused inflation in the value of women reflected in the bride price, which is more than many poor rural or working class Chinese men can afford.  Kidnaped women from other countries have a market rate lower than the bride price for a Chinese woman, which is what is driving the interest in kidnaped wives.

For a rural man not to have a wife and family destroys any meaning for his life.  There is no reason for him to work or put effort into his life, he is just a dead man walking, a life without purpose.

Again, file that away, we’ll get to it in a minute.

The issue with kidnapping Asian girls is similar to relocating raccoons.  If they are too close to home, they will eventually return.

This has forced the Chinese to go further and further out from China to kidnap wives, so far away that it is almost impossible for them to run away and return home.

China’s Trafficked Brides: Thanks to the one child policy, Chinese men are turning to Ukrainian brides and sex trafficking to find wives.

The saying might be “love don’t cost a thing,” but in China, hopeful Shanghainese grooms are expected to pay as much as $147,000 to their future bride’s family. This growing cost, driven by a shortage of Chinese women, is why some bachelors are heading abroad in search of wives.

In a surprising twist, many are looking to Eastern Europe, urged on by viral social media posts about Chinese men who have married young, local women. State-run newspapers have even joined the chorus extolling the benefits of going overseas.

These women start dating men, who take them back to China, then find themselves unable to return home.

Bride market trafficks Pakistani Christian women to China

Hundreds young women from Pakistan’s small Christian minority have been trafficked to China as brides in recent months as their impoverished community is targeted in an aggressive new marriage market, activists and officials say.

Brokers offer desperately poor parents thousands of dollars to give girls in marriage to Chinese men, even cruising outside churches for potential brides. They are helped by Christian pastors paid to preach to their congregations with promises of wealth in exchange for their daughters.

Once in China, the girls — most often married against their will — can find themselves isolated in rural regions, vulnerable to abuse, unable to communicate and reliant on a translation app even for a glass of water. Touted as wealthy Christian converts, the grooms often turn out to be neither, according to accounts from brides, their parents, an activist, pastors and government officials, speaking to The Associated Press.

So Chinese men and smugglers are kidnapping women to be wives in China from all over Asia and as far away as Eastern Europe.

There is a famous quote by the great French economist Frederic Bastiat:

“When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will”

Now that all the evidence is laid out, let’s add it all up and see where it goes.

In the past, poor and working class young men, especially those from rural areas, enlisted in the military to elevate their social status.

This was true of the British and French imperial armies.  A young man with no prospects could enlist and earn some level of honor and prestige as a non-commissioned officer that he did not have by the circumstances of his birth.

Generally, wars have been fought for two reasons, ideology and resources.  The later, resources have traditionally been land related, either farmland, access to ports, or some natural resource extracted from the land such as precious metals or oil.

The Nazis put a word to this: lebensraum.

Soon to be in China is tens of millions of young, military age men, from poor families and poor areas, who have no prospect of marriage because of a lack of women, and this leaves them with virtually no purpose or meaning in their lives.

In China, there is no resource as precious to the population of surplus men as women.  Wife kidnapping is evidence of this, but many men are just too poor to afford to buy a black market bride.

As more and more of these young men get angry and resentful that they not just will never have wives, but may forever be virgins, as a result of the government’s one child policy, the government of China is going to have to deal with this social unrest.

One way to death with this surplus population is the way the British did, through colonialism and conquest.

It is not a far fetched idea that the Chinese government may draft its surplus male population into the world’s largest imperial army for the purposes of conquering other nations in Asia for their women.

A young, poor, Chinese man with few prospects might very well choose to join the military and fight and risk death for a wife than live alone as a virgin, shunned by Chinese society.

Kidnapping women from one nation and transporting them to another only redistributes the problem of surplus men, the only fix is to eliminate the surplus.  War is perhaps the most effective way to solve this surplus of men, as it will be men from both the conquering and defending armies that will die.

As shown above, the number of male casualties in this war will have to exceed 35 million for China and some 70 Million for all of Aisa.  All in all, it may be 100 million or more to decompress this growing crisis.

In not many years, we may see World War Three begin, not because of Religion or Oil, but sex.

If and when this comes, my suggestion is to remind the Chinese just how beautiful Persian women are and that the population of Iran is about 70 Million and half female, enough to satiate their needs.  Also, Muslim women are raised to be subordinate to men so would make subservient wives.

You might as well let one problem solve another.

Who knows, one day we may have the chance to travel to China to see the National Monument to the Heroes of the Battle of Poontang.

(Again, I’m sorry, I couldn’t resist one more joke.)

Spread the love

Fascist Trump orders the arrest of Journalist and seizing his electronics.

Oh wait! What am I saying?

A San Francisco journalist said Sunday authorities knocked down the gate of his home with a sledgehammer, handcuffed him for hours and seized thousands of dollars in electronics after he refused to identify a confidential source.

The journalist, Bryan Carmody, said in an interview that the raid occurred Friday — though officers from the San Francisco Police Department first asked him two weeks ago about who provided a police report that revealed details of the death of the city’s longtime public defender, Jeff Adachi, in February..

San Francisco journalist says police raided his home after he refused to identify source

But how this can be SaFran? You are the Mecca of liberal thought and absolute devotion and respect for the profession of Journalism! What happened?

When the officers arrived at Carmody’s home, he said, “They asked me to give them the source. Of course I declined.”
When authorities returned on Friday, Carmody said officers had a warrant that appeared to say they were looking for the report, which was described as “stolen or embezzled” property.

“Today’s actions are one step in the process of investigating a potential case of obstruction of justice along with the illegal distribution of a confidential police report,” it said.
The local chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists condemned the raid, saying it “shows an alarming disregard for the right to gather and report on information.” The group said it was seeking more information on why the department did not follow California’s shield laws, which protects journalists who refuse to disclose a source’s identity.

I love it when Journos find out the hard way they can expect true danger from those they swear will protect them. One journo deviate from being propagandist and felt the power of the government he is supposed to protect.

 

 

 

Spread the love

Dear WordPress: Bring back the Spell Checker.

I know you figured it was cool to get rid of it for the new upgrade, but it is VERY necessary and I am getting tired of writing somewhere else, spell check it and then paste it in the editor.

Thanks!

Spread the love

Poking Fun At the Chavista Defenders.

Last night, while 2/3 of the humanity was engaged with Game of Thrones,  I had some fun trolling the living lights out of defenders of the Bolivarian-Chavista Revolution both here in the US and abroad. As with the rest of the Left, there were no problems in this world till Trump got elected, and only then things went bad in Venezuela. I was accused to be one of Venezuela’s Ultra Rich that escaped (I guess they think I am  now residing comfortably in some multi-million dollar fully paid condo high above in the Miami skyline) and that I am all for the US invading Venezuela to depose Maduro.

They were rather surprised when I told them I did not support an invasion of Venezuela, that is the people there were not willing to risk their lives to liberate their country, why should Americans be put at risk? A couple of people that were only tuned at the No Invasion singsong were in a conundrum: Here is a guy who openly hates the Maduro regime so he is an enemy, but does not want an invasion so he is friend?

The survivor of the exchange went with the belief that if I hate Maduro, I had to be for the Opposition and attacked.  Of course, he was also confused when I told him that in my opinion, Chavistas Leaders and Opposition politicians should share the same firing squad. After some fits and false starts, the theme was now changed to be being in favor of mass executions and Genocide. Never forget that without moving goalposts, the left cannot maintain an argument for long. I did reply that you could keep the executions well under a hundred and the rest of the assholes would take the hint and shape up or flee the country. What was not appreciated was me reminding them that this strategy was well used by Fidel Castro and Che Guevara after the Cuban Revolution. I did have to admit that I had forgotten about the Colectivo goons and that would increase the amount of assholes that needed to be put down.

After that, the lonely fighter reached for some out of content quotes, proclaimed I was a liar and flaunted his sorry butt behind a block. It was fun! I admit he put a brave effort, but the truth is a couple of slogans from a Lefty Gringo and some Latino living the life in the US are not good enough to put lipstick in the crap hole that is Venezuela thanks to both Government and Opposition.

 

 

 

Spread the love

Democrat Anti-Semitism watch, May 13th edition

It is the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

Consequently the Democrats, the party that loves to mock thoughts and prayers, asked an Imam to open the House with a prayer.

Clearly the same people who take every opportunity to attack Christians and keep them out of Judges seats, love the idea of endorsing Islamic prayer in the house.

Because their favorite Muslim hate preacher, Louis Farrakhan is now  persona non grata and kicked off Facebook,  they had to find someone new.

They found Linda Sarsour’s favorite Imam.

Or as the Times of Israel put it:

Anti-Zionist imam delivers opening prayers in US House

An imam who has wished for the end of Zionism, called for a third Intifada and likened Israel to Nazi-era Germany delivered the opening prayer for a session of the US House of Representatives on Thursday.

Suleiman has a long record of incendiary social media statements about Israel, as compiled two years ago by Petra Marquardt-Bigman, a researcher, and posted on the Algeimeiner Jewish news site. He has on multiple occasions wished for a third Palestinian Intifada, or violent uprising, likened Israeli troops to Nazis, and has wished for the end of Zionism, calling Zionists “the enemies of God.” He is a backer of the boycott Israel movement.

This was confirmed.

Best Friends: Linda Sarsour and Muslim Brotherhood Supporter Omar Suleiman

In late August 2014, Linda Sarsour declared that Imam Omar Suleiman made her “more proud to be a Muslim and a Palestinian.” One year later, she praised him as one of several Muslim “scholars … who speak truth w/ courage & w/o apology.” Suleiman responded: “jazakiallah khayr [may Allah reward you with goodness] and thank you for being a leader in the trenches!”

In July 2016, Sarsour promoted a glowing tribute to Suleiman and told [archived] her Twitter followers: “Check out this profile of one of America’s most prominent imams @omarsuleiman504. Proud to call him a friend.” Suleiman warmly returned her compliments, responding: “Just following in your footsteps ? It’s an honor to have you as a sister, friend, and leader.” And just a few weeks ago, Sarsour shared yet another article praising Suleiman; she told her followers: “Imam @omarsuleiman504 has inspired me to love my religion even more. A man of spirituality, conviction & justice.”

When you are endorsed by Linda Sarsour, that it a bad sign for the rest of us.

On July, 25, 2014, Suleiman declared on Twitter and Facebook: “How befitting that the 3rd Intifada starts on the 27th night of Ramadan as worshippers are denied prayer in Masjid Al Aqsa.” He ended his post with a prayer of sorts: “God willing on this blessed night as the 3rd Intifada begins, the beginning of the end of Zionism is here. May Allah help us overcome this monster, protect the innocent of the world, and accept the murdered as martyrs. ameen.”

The Facebook post garnered 1.9K comments, more than 4,200 shares, 17K “Likes,” and was even published on a Malaysian website. Suleiman’s call for a “3rd Intifada” and his explicit effort to cast it in religious terms came in the middle of the war between Gaza’s Hamas regime and Israel. That conflict, of course, followed the kidnapping and murder of three Israeli teenagers by Hamas members in June, and the firing of rockets by Hamas into Israel.

Just three months after declaring the imminent outbreak of a “3rd Intifada,” Suleiman posted on Twitter on October 30, 2014: “For the first time since 1967, Masjid Al Aqsa is closed. A third intifada is near insha’Allah. #FreePalestine.” Adding the inflammatory hashtag #AlAqsaUnderAttack, he posted the same text with an image of a closed entrance on Facebook, where the post garnered 377 comments, 11K “Likes” and more than 3,200 shares (which are visible only on the original post).

Suleiman’s eager anticipation of a “third intifada” is all the more chilling considering that during the infamous Second Intifada — also known as the Al-Aqsa Intifada — Palestinian terrorists slaughtered more than 1,000 Israelis and wounded many thousands more. And revealingly, Suleiman rushed to post his second call for a repeat of this kind of carnage even though the closure of the Al Aqsa Mosque — and indeed the entire Temple Mount – lasted only a few hours.

This is from his now deleted Twitter page:

 

So this is an Imam who supports the genocidal terrorism of Israel.  Fantastic.

Then there is this from his now purged Facebook page.

And this flyer was from an event sponsored by CAIR in which Suleiman was vocal against Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem and moving of the American embassy.

 

 

This guy is is objectively a Jew hating, anti-Israel, supporter of terrorism who is loved by other Leftist terrorist supporters.

Clearly that is why he was picked by the Democrats to give a prayer from the floor of the House.

One would think that the Democrats would strive to find someone less controversial, carrying less baggage, but that wouldn’t fly with their ever more radical, Jew hating base.

The Democrats just can’t stop showing us what kind of awful people they have become, it’s up for the rest of America to notice and act accordingly.

 

Spread the love