Gun Free Zone

I read AWA’s post Feeling Down Post Election.

I’m going to take a different tack on this.

We are officially a post-election nation.  Elections no longer define our political future.

In a representative democracy, the people pick their leaders.  The election is the formal system by which that idea is carried out.

When the system works, each side or candidate presents arguments as to why they believe they will be best for the country and the people weigh each argument thrn vote.

That system is dead, except perhaps, in the state of Florida.  I’ll get back to Florida in a second.

We can argure how America has gotten to polarized, but I’m not buying that.  It may have, but that’s not the sole cause of the problem.

The Democrats have learned that election fuckery is more important than trying to convince voters they are the better choice.

Understand that I use the term fuckery to describe a whole gamut of things, that may include Illegal acts, but not everything they do is illegal.

I’d argume that most aren’t.  It behooves them to keep the illegal acts to a minimum so as not to get caught.

So let’s get into the legal fuckery.

Early voting is one of the worst offenders.

I fundamentally do not understand the purpose of early voting.  It’s like calling a horse race before it’s over.  If you called the 1973 Belmot Stakes in the first turn, Sham is the winner.

We saw a lot of people say had they known about the Hunter Biden laptop story before the election, they wouldn’t have voted for Joe Biden.

In 2022, more that half of Democrats voted for Fetterman before his disastrous debate with Dr. Oz.

Voting before a debate or before any “October surprise” has occurred is wrong.  It’s legal but shouldn’t happen.  Fuckery.

Ballot harvesting, correcting ballots, and everything that occurs during the days and weeks between the end of election night and when certain states or cities release their totals is fuckery.

The fuck-up in Maricopa County that discouraged voters is fuckery.

People can say “Dr. Oz was a bad candidate” but how bad was he compared to a retarded sentient houseplant that he lost fair and square without fuckery?

I believe that 2016 was the last election that mattered.

Hillary Clinton lost and the Democrats decided that leaving picking leaders up to voting wasn’t working for them and the only way to ensure victory was through fuckery.

The 2020 election was win through fuckery.

Social media hiding the Hunter Biden story until after votes, especially early voting, was in was fuckery.

The media complex and FBI pushing the fraudulent Russian Collusion story was fuckery.

There was no way Joe Biden won without fuckery.

And now we get back to Florida.

Florida was almost won by Andrew Gillum because of fuckery, but DeSantis came out on top.

I mentioned in a previous post that he flipped Miami-Dade by 28 points and won West Palm Beach.

But now I wonder how much he actually flipped them versus how much fuckery was stacked against him in 2018, and how much of his margin of victory was just the elimination of fuckery.

And with DeSantis winning by such a margin, we’re seeing the Left say that he won by cheating and how Florida needs it’s voting laws changed.

No, they want to reinstate fuckery in Florida to take it back.

So that is where we are.

From here on out, national elections, and many (almost all) battleground state elections will be decided by fuckery.

We are no better off than Banana Republics.

Honestly, I find the current situation unfathomable otherwise.

We have the highest inflation in generations, record high food prices, record high energy prices, a housing market that is a bubble filled with TNT, a stock market that has wiped out over a trillion dollars in people’s retirement, the collapse of America as a super power on the global stage, and a president with an approval rating in the 30s.

Half of Americans say they are worse off now than they were in 2021 and the majority of Americans are pessimistic about America’s economic future.

And yet the American people voted to give Biden and his party majority controll of the Congress.

I cannot believe this happened without fuckery.

It’s not obvious enough that significant social upheaval will occur.

We’re just in this political limbo between where our system is too broken for the system to fix it and the utter violent collapse of our system.

Look, I’m hopeful that DeSantis runs against Joe Biden in 2024.  And if he wins I’ll eat my words.

Buy I’m terrified that polling will have DeSantis up by 20+% over Biden, Florida will vote for go 60+% for DeSantis, and Biden will win the presidency with every swing state going 52-48 for Biden because of fuckery.

I kicked the Libertarian hornets next on Twitter.

Motherfucker, do I hate Libertarians.

Keep in mind I used to be one.

It was my first political awakening in college.

I came for the idea of freedom.

What I found was a hotbed of antisemitism and an attitude of “I got mine, fuck you.”

There wasn’t an antisemitic conspiracy the Libertarians didn’t wholeheartedly traffic in.

Let a Libertarian talk uninterrupted for five minutes and you’ll find out that the entire United States government is bought and paid for by the Jews and the Knesset gives Congress it’s marching orders.

That’s before they get into ranting about the Rothschilds and international banking.

Then they would counter with “We’re only noticing the facts” and the misattributed Voltaire quote ““To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

That quote is actually from the neo-Nazi founder of the National Vanguard neo-Nazi organization to justify his Jew hatred.

I think the moment that broke me was Libertarian who argued that the Holocaust wasn’t as bad as it was because the Jews went willingly, if it was really that bad they would have fought back more.

I thought I had found a group that was interested in political freedom.

What I found were a bunch of antisemitic pedophiles who wanted to sit around and argue against age of consent and Marijuana laws.

Part of the wonder of the Bruen decision was the two fold win of no more “two step analysis” and a requirement that the government show that there was an analigus law in 1791 at the time of adoption of the second amendment.

Text and history of the second amendment is the controlling feature of what infringements are allowed.

We have now seen two different cases where the state is turning this upside down.

In one case the judge ruled against an injunction because “The clear reading of the second amendment does not protect the right to manufacture firearms”.  In this case the Judge and the state are arguing that the plaintiffs must provide some sort of historical reference showing that the text and traditions of the second amendment support the manufacture of firearms.

The actual opinion says that the government must show that there is a gun control law that banned or limited the manufacturing of firearms by individuals in 1791.  Thus the Judge has turned the argument upside down.  They have again made it so the plaintiff must prove that the constitution covers their claim via text and tradition.

In California they are doing the same thing.  The state has stated that since the second amendment doesn’t mention magazines and because magazines are not required for a firearm to function that they are ok to ban magazines.

When the Bruen opinion came out we identified the weaknesses in the opinion.  Those came down to “sensitive places” and “uncommon firearms”.  We knew they would look for other methods, and it is clear that they are following cases as much as we are.

In each of the suits brought under Bruen they have watched to see what stuck and what didn’t.

We had one judge state that it wasn’t his job to be a historian, even though that is exactly his job under the American “common law” ideals.  Research is a huge part of dealing the law.  We had another judge decide that “manufacturing” isn’t part of “keep and bear”.  Now the state is arguing again that the plain reading of the constitution doesn’t include magazines.

Keep an eye on how they manipulate the language of the decision. This is how they have been doing this for the last 70 years.

https://videos.gunfreezone.net/videos/watch/9a166910-daec-4a6b-95aa-2d785fbc00d5

The horror!

Feel free to share.

This was the fight back then. Handguns were the mortal enemy of Americans (not the criminals, mind you) and they needed to be controlled/banned.

And it was a fight they kept losing. There was (and still exist) no desire to ban the most popular firearm in the US then or as in 1968 0r 1934, so they had to rebrand themselves. Handgun Control Inc changed its name to Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. And then a mythical enemy was created out of a web of technical lies: “Assault Weapons.” And with the help of a dutifully helpful and submissive media, they succeeded in tightening firearms laws across the US. The idea was to get the cart rolling downhill and eventually get all guns out of people’s hands.

Of course, there was a pushback, but it sucked time and effort which could have been used in getting to where we are much earlier.

Never stop fighting because they are not stopping themselves.

On the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month……