On Monay, an elderly man was at a Starbucks in Palo Alto, California, enjoying a cup of covfefe, not realizing that Palo Alto was a Trump supporter free zone.
The woman, who posted the incident on Facebook under the user name Parker Mankey, admitted she was trying to publicly shame someone for wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat. She confronted the man at a Starbucks and vowed to expose his personal information so other people could track him down and shame him too.
“This woman comes over, and she says ‘Is that a Trump hat?’ I said, ‘I think it is, yes.’ And then she turned to the rest of the audience, the people in Starbucks and said ‘Hey, everybody! Come over here! Let’s get this guy! He’s a hater! I’m calling him out! He hates brown people. He’s a Nazi,” Victor recalled.
Mankey’s Facebook post describes a similar story to Victor’s, and it adds a response to another user that she is going to protest outside Victor’s work and “make him feel as unsafe as he made every brown person he met today.”
Here is a screen grab of that Facebook post (grabbed second hand, the original seems to be missing).
So a woman threatens to doxx a man and drive him from Starbucks and the public square because she doesn’t like his hat and the politics it represents – as well as what she thinks it represents – but he’s the fascists.
We’ve seen enough of these types of incidents where this should surprise no one.
Where this story goes from predictable to infuriating is how the City of Palo Alto official Human Rights Commissioner went to great length to defend this woman and criticize Trump supporters.
This is Lee.
I’m still looking for a case of a Trump supporter going ape-shit in a restaurant or anywhere else on a person in a I’m With Her shirt, threatening them, trying to doxx them, and otherwise ruin their life.
Not to mention that what the Left says MAGA means isn’t what Trump supporters say it means.
Nothing about that that man did sitting in a Starbucks was in the mud, so once again, what we have here is a case of projection.
Lee can say his views are his own, but this is how the City of Palo Alto chose to headline the story.
Political polarization sparks confrontation at Starbucks, triggering online fury
Really? Sparks confrontation?
How about “crazy Progressive tries to destroy an elderly man’s life because he wore a hat.”
Clearly Lee’s views are shared by the rest of Palo Alto.
The Left had to make up an attack in which a Progressive was attacked and told “this is MAGA country.”
The Right has experienced actual attacks in which we were told “this is not MAGA country.”
As Trump’s chances is 2020 keep looking better in comparison to the shitshow of the DNC primary, expect more of this to keep happening.
Stay safe out there and don’t go to Palo Alto.
Screw that, DO go to palo alto. Wear the hat, shirt, and a flag while your at it. The more lefties sperg over it, the better our chances at reclaiming our territory.
… and wear one of these t-shirts: https://www.etsy.com/market/diversity_gun_shirt
I think I would’ve called the police and filed charges against him for criminal threatening and IF he touched me all bets are off.
Just saw a note that this women lost her job over her stupidity. Score 1 for MAGA. Mr Lee obviously has zero idea of the history of this Country and her “values”. Im gettin really tired of these F in morons..
What’s needed is 100, 300 people all wearing MAGA hats going into businesses and patronizing them. 30 people in line at Starbucks getting a Venti-uno-grande iced mochachoca latte soy (easy on the foam) with a twist of tittyberry. 20 more at the restaurant next door and so on.
It’s time to show these fucks we are not afraid.
[…] Remember that story yesterday about the crazy Leftist who harassed an old man in a Starbucks over his MAGA ha…. […]
She threatened his kids. By implication, but a threat nevertheless.
Ever hear the saying “Beyond the Pale”?
Threatening someones children puts one there.
Doing so removes a person from the protection of law, and the protection of society, and leaves every mans hand free. The Political Law may disagree, but the Moral Law is as relevant as it ever was.
The incessant internet-twitter-facebook mob has somehow reinforced the insane com-scums idea that they can get away with actions previously thought unthinkable in a civilized society.
They are skating on thin ice .