TALLAHASSEE — A circuit judge has given a boost to more than 30 local governments challenging a 2011 state law that threatens stiff penalties for city or county officials who approve gun restrictions.
Leon County Circuit Judge Charles Dodson last week refused a request by Attorney General Pam Bondi’s office to dismiss three consolidated lawsuits that contend the 2011 law, which threatens penalties such as removal from office, is unconstitutional. Local governments challenged the law after the February mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Broward County, as at least some cities and counties looked at approving gun-related measures.
BREAKING: Judge clears way for challenges to Florida’s preemption statute
I do believe we would not be seeing this happening if SB 7026 had been stopped in the Legislature. But now Republicans are more less afraid of us and more willing to kiss the ass of the hyper-financed Gun Control and appear get the seal of Good Guy/Gal with the media.
If the polls are to be trusted, Senator Nelson will be re-elected by a pure squeak. Scott could have this one in the pocket long ago, but he pissed off Gun Owners enough that I believe many simply will refuse to vote for his ass, but simply ain’t saying it. Lord knows every polling service that has called me has gotten a full “I am not voting for either of the assholes” speech from me.
The Florida GOP needs to learn a lesson but I am afraid they will not. More idiots will need to be substituted come 2020.
And yes, the next four years are gonna suck as a Florida Gun Owner.
Thanks so much for your virtue signaling. I guess you are a 19 year old purveyor of bump stocks. Because the only other reason you could not vote for Scott is that he is not “perfect”. And by that logic, you should have had Hillary as prezzi, since Trump is not “perfect”. Yes, a 6-3 LIBERAL SCOTUS would sure teach them anti-gun Repubs a thing or two. And with a liberal Congress we would be guaranteed semi-auto bans, mag capacity laws and god knows what else. Now THAT would REALLY teach them something. Could you help me look for my nose? I seem to have cut it off. And proof read your posts. The last one was hard to make out what you were talking about.
For your problem, I recommend Midol in the prescribed quantities.
“Because the only other reason you could not vote for Scott is that he is not “perfect”.”
No, because he signed into law SB 7026, a bad bill through and through that does nothing to protect schools and did screw up Gun Rights in Florida.
“And by that logic, you should have had Hillary as prezzi, since Trump is not “perfect””
Sorry, you don’t get to make up stuff and then blame I said so. I think that is called LYING.
“Yes, a 6-3 LIBERAL SCOTUS would sure teach them anti-gun Repubs a thing or two”
You do need to put the Meth pipe down. I do believe SCOTUS is now the opposite of what you just said.
“Now THAT would REALLY teach them something.”
No, what teaches them something is sending assholes like Scott to civilian life for voting against the Second Amendment.
“And with a liberal Congress we would be guaranteed semi-auto bans, mag capacity laws and god knows what else. “
Probably, but it seems we are also electing RINOS that would vote the same way if slightly pressured in the nuts, just like Scott. They have chosen to act like pussies, they get to reap the civilian life.
” Could you help me look for my nose? I seem to have cut it off. ”
Told ya to lay off the meth pipe. And don’t play with knives.
“And proof read your posts. The last one was hard to make out what you were talking about.”
Do you mean proofread?
You read this blog because you want to. If it bothers you that much, go someplace else. Now, if you are a masochist, I can charge you $50 weekly for the privilege of make your feeling hurt.
Whips and chains extra.