Ladd Everitt has a sweet time with Andy Raymond, the Maryland gun dealer that wanted to sell the Armatix iP1 and got chastised for it.
It was at that point that Andy reached out to me via email and asked us to delete his video from CSGV’s YouTube account (we refused to, but he got YouTube to yank it shortly thereafter). A back and forth exchange ensued regarding insurrectionism and gun policy. At some point, Andy stopped and asked me if I’d like to come to his store to “chit chat.” We’d “just talk” and “keep it civil,” he said. I told him that would be great, and asked him if we might also go shooting. He told me no problem and we set a date.
And then this:
The real reason the NRA opposes the technology, of course, is that they don’t want any precedent established that the gun industry can be regulated for consumer health and safety
Or maybe because the patent of the transceiver (wristwatch) says it can be activated/de-activated from a remote location by a higher “hierarchy.”
Is there something in the water that I have not been told about? Where is this crop of idiots popping from?
And we all know that ‘hierarchy from a remote location’ could never be hacked, could it?
I think the idiocy is also airborne.
Or at a very minimum can be jammed with a more powerful emitter The electronic innards in the gun is a receiver.