Well you guys really aren’t very interested in me. You were more interested in another Q&A with Hagar than me. You were more interested in nobody than me. You were more interested in J.Kb. than me.
You were mostly interested in Miguel. I shouldn’t be surprised. I’ll ask if he’ll do it. No promises. You don’t have to worry though, no AMA for me.
Hey guys, I’m not upset, this is why I put up the polls. It makes it easier to find out what you all want to hear about.
And what ever made you think you could get out of the gun nut mafia? 😉
Well, awa, I enjoyed what you’re already doing and didn’t want you to take time away from that feature of this blog, so I didn’t select you for AMA. But if you need a break from wading through the workload required to produce legal analysis, that fine with me, I know it will be exceptional and very informative. So, again, follow your passion.
FWIW, I didn’t participate in the poll, but I like your stuff, awa. It just needs a TL;DR summary most of the time. 😉
Thank you for joining us Scrappycrow. I think it was Curby that said the same thing earlier. That I needed to summarize my posts. I’ve been attempting to add a bottom line up front to all of my posts. Even if it is only to say “this is a rant, tough”.
.
In the last article I wrote Rupp v. Bonta as long as it was that entire article was a TL;DR;. That was some 1500 or so pages reduced to that one article. By the time I got to that point I just didn’t have the energy to write a TL;DR for the TL;DR article. Grin
.
Regardless, I will attempt to do a better job of summarizing my articles in the B.L.U.F.
I may be the outlier, but I like the TL posts… because I DR – “do read” – especially the legal case analyses – these appellate cases are often difficult and nuanced to read in the original (not to mention usually 100’s of pages – and in CA sometimes 1000’s of pages of pure junk! vis. the ‘expert’ testimony on the number of mules needed to carry military supplies)
AWA – you are hitting it outta the park with the summaries, even if they are 10 ‘pages’ deep – this ain’ Twitter…
Well Poop! I like what you write. It is well researched, thoughtfully presented and shows you take your writing seriously. It makes me think. Now I’m really sorry I didn’t participate in the voting. Apologies.
To be clear I don’t think my sense of humor came through in this post. I’m actually looking forward to the AMA for Miguel.
.
I’m having a great time with it. I’m glad I extended the poll from a simple “yes/no” to include all the options it did.
.
Thank you all that participated then or now.