The anti-vaxers have had their fun. They’re now engaged in open incitement to murder. It’s time for arrests, prosecutions, and serious jail time.
— (((Dan Hodges))) (@DPJHodges) July 24, 2021
Here is some fucker calling for persecution of people he calls anti-vaxers.
What is an anti-vaxer?
By the current standard I’m anti-vax.
I don’t want to vaccinate my children against COVID because the evidence indicates that at their ages, the vaccine is worse than the virus.
I also think mandatory vaccination and vaccine passports, particularly for a vaccine that is still only approved under emergency use circumstances, is a bad idea.
I think people should do their own risk assessment and decide for themselves if they want to be vaccinated or not.
That opinion apparently is incitement to murder.
Moreover, if what is being said about COVID is true, i.e., both the vaccinated and unvaccinated can be infected and spread it, the difference is the severity and rate of mortality is lower in the vaccinated, the unvaccinated or anti-vaxers are not affecting the rate of transmission.
The point here isn’t to save lives.
The point here is to say “the people who believe in vaccination the way I do are ubermenchen and the people who don’t are untermenschen, and to secure the existence of our people and a future for vaccinated children, the anti-vaxers must be collectively punished.”
I must add, particularly in light of this fascist’s fascist impulses, he needs to take down his echo [((()))] which is a symbol of solidarity with Jews targeted by neo-Nazis, because he embraces Naziesque ideas, just aimed at a different group of people.
It’s no longer about medical science or public health. Hell, it’s not even about politics. It’s purely tribal at this point.
“Bear Tribe good! Bear Tribe is best tribe! Bear Tribe follow Great Leader. Bear Tribe have good medicine. Bear Tribe wear mask to keep away Evil Spirit;
“River Tribe bad. River Tribe is worst tribe. River Tribe led by stupid chief. River Tribe have bad medicine. River Tribe no wear mask, carry curse of Evil Spirit;
“Bear Tribe make war on River Tribe. For honor and glory of Great Leader!”
It’s never been about the science. It’s been all about the feels and the political ambitions.
Which is why the Dems didn’t support any action against COVID until the Impeachment failed and they had to find a different way to go after President Trump and shut down his re-election possibilities.
Just look at all the ways various states violated their own laws and constitutions in order to steal the election.
I’m old enough to remember when vaccines were bad. Anti-vaxxers were heroes.
Or has Jenny McCarthy suddenly become a supporter of vaccines?
I’m old enough to remember the Swine Flu vaccine that killed 50ish people and being sick for weeks after the vaccination of school children before the vaccine was pulled.
So… Yes, not as many have died from the vaccine as have died with Covid, but far more than 50 people have died from the vaccines,
Yet the powers-that-be are still pushing the vaccines?
Is it just me, or did forced participation in medical experiments (this ain’t a fully tested and duly approved product, folks) used to be a crime against humanity?
Also, of course: the fundamental premise behind “not getting vaccinated is basically murder” is that the vaccine doesn’t in fact work. If we assume that it protects those who choose to receive it, then they should be in no danger from those who don’t. But I guess cults don’t work like that, so anything short of 107% compliance is unacceptable.
That is the big issue with all the 2021 hot air about masks and vaccines and surges.
After the initial “don’t use masks” (which was a scam to protect a limited supply) the clear consensus was “masks are not to protect you, they are to protect those around you from you”. And that makes sense if you consider what ordinary (not N95) masks do and don’t do.
But at some point masks morphed into something you had to wear to protect yourself if you’re not vaccinated. And then it morphed into something you have to wear whether vaccinated or not. None of this is supported by any science; the people perpetrating these mandates don’t even bother to pretent it is, since they never give us any data. That indicates, of course, that no such data exist.
Something something huckleberry…………………..
Say when, Mr. Hodges.
Guess ‘my body my choice’ was so much hot air, too.
Who is this person? Why do I care what he shat onto Twitter?
It hasn’t been about “science” for a long time. Almost no one blustering is able to evaluate the science. It’s about who you believe, and why.
In France they are going to arrest people that are not vaccinated. In the United States the brach covidians want mandatory door to door forced vaccination against your will and want you to be executed with trial for resisting.
I asked my mom about that and she said the federal government should have the authority to go door to door and vaccinate people by force. If you tell them to fuck off they should be legally allowed to break down your door SWAT team style, forcibly restrain you, and vaccinate you against your will. Not only that but if people resist harder the government should be fully authorized to kill you. My mother support the government injecting you against your will and killing you if you resist. I told her that is going to be millions of people. Her response. Every single United States citizen that refuses the vaccine should be executed and it won’t really make any difference because COVID is going to kill them anyway. She views getting COVID as basically a 100% death sentence and you will die from it. Every time I talk with her she tells me in a joyously mockingly tone how much money she will get from selling all my guns and everything I own. It’s difficult being around her anymore.
She is probably a main reason why I say the crazy things I do. The democrats are her religion and Obama and now Biden are literally gods to her. For she believes the government should have opened with machine gun fire on the people that went to DC on the 6th and every protestor that is arrested should be immediately executed without trial for treason.
Shawn, you must have the patience of Job….
I wondered what the triple parentheses meant.
Thank you for explaining.
I worry that using the point that the vaccine is as yet FDA unapproved is a rather thin peice of ice to stake an argument in. Is there any reason to suppose its not just a matter of time before the FDA gets around to approving it ?
FDA approval will not make the vaccine any safer, more neccisary, or more reasonable to consider taking, especially for young people who seem largely to have been unaffected by the disease to begin with.
And with things being what they are, does anyone have any reason to suppose the FDA of all people are going to be the ones to make a stand against mass stupidity and hysteria and whatever else is gotten into people’s heads ?
FDA approval means the manufacturer has jumped through lots of hoops. It doesn’t mean the product is safe or effective, though it does mean there has been some data submitted saying it seems to be safe in trials and seems to be effective in the people that were tested. The manufacturer remains liable for any problems. The FDA accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any problems in any product they approved.
The real thing the FDA does is (a) prevent life saving products from coming to market, (b) delay life saving products. Both mean that the primary consequence of the FDA’s existence is more death.
A small scale example: when the initial approvals were requested for the CCP virus vaccines, the FDA sat on them for a month or more waiting for some collection of chairwarmers to get together and pontificate about the application. And that was for “emergency” approval. Apparently in DC “emergency” means “action sometime in the next couple of months”.
What was the death rate of Covid at the time? About 3000 per day, I believe. So the delay of a month or so perpetrated by the FDA translates directly into 100k people killed by the Federal government not wanting to do its job.
Oh by the way: once a product has received FDA approval, it can be prescribed for any purpose. That’s called “off label” use, and it is entirely at the discretion of the prescribing doctor. It turns out that a substantial fraction of all prescriptions are “off label” — I’m not sure if it is the majority but if not it certainly is a large minority of the cases.
What that means is that the FDA notion that they need to validate “efficacy” is utterly bogus, because the efficacy for whatever it is prescribed for is judged by the doctor, not the FDA. A flimsy case could be made for the idea that an FDA check of safety is useful, though I’m not at all convinced the data justifies that. But anything else done by the FDA is merely utterly unjustifiable damage to patients waiting for a new cure to be unshackled.