Douglas kids get a taste of power on CNN
Emma Gonzalez is a student at Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school. She survived an unbelievable tragedy, and my heart goes out to her for that.
However, thanks to CNN, that is where my empathy ends and my anger begins.
She is a victim. By the laws of modern social convention, that gives her power and the right to get vengeance against those she identified as her oppressors.
CNN gave her a platform and she gave this speech.
That is a power play. She’s got her notes from AP Government and is proceeding to lecture the United States on its Founding Father’s intentions on guns and the effectiveness of the Australian gun ban, and argues against the NRA and Trump.
CNN interviewed her a second time, along with a friend.
This is a girl who is now addicted to power. She is going to use her victim status be beat other people into submission with the help of CNN. Fast forward to 4:12 and she is asked “what do you say to the NRA?”
Their answer is “disband, dismantle” and “don’t you dare come back here.”
The NRA is an organization of millions of members and has existed since 1871, but it’s supposed to disband because one teenage girl says so?
Forget the Second Amendment, that’s and attack on the First Amendment “right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
She immediately jumps into the progressive politics of power dynamics. The NRA “has had power for so long” and now it is time for a victim to take that power away. She said “gun control is the first thing we are focusing on.” Meaning what? After gun control what comes next? Once she has achieved her power play on guns, what is the next ‘for the children‘ right she wants to take away?
Then she lays down her ultimatum. NRA money is blood money.
This of course is the ONLY reason conservative politicians support gun rights, it’s not that they have principles or anything. I’m pretty sure the NRA gives money to politicians who support gun rights and not politicians support gun rights because of a few thousand dollars of NRA money. I doubt Ted Cruz would vote for an AWB if the NRA didn’t cut his campaign a check. I think this is just another example of Liberal projection. They have no principles except doing what they need to, to stay and power, so they assume gun rights supporters are the same.
Back to NRA blood money. She makes it clear politicians “funding the killers or standing with the children.” Miguel covered the “NRA trained Cruz” lie already. This girl is doubling down on it on CNN and making it clear that you are either with her or against her. There is no middle ground.
That is a power play. Either give up your gun rights, your right of assembly, your right to engage in politics, or you are “against the children.” And, of course, on a monster would be “against the children.”
“If you can’t get elected without taking money from child murderers, why are you running?”
That is a hell of a statement, calling the NRA child murderers and impugning the morality of anybody on the other side of their position.
I want to support the kids who survived watching their classmates getting killed. But this girl and her friend have thrown down the gauntlet and declared me her enemy.
She’s a victim and I must bend to her will. I have to stop supporting the NRA, give up my guns, and acquiesce to whatever restriction of rights she proposes next, or I am a child murderer who stands against the children.
Nope. I’m not going to let a teenage girl, or anybody for that matter, get on CNN with their freshly minted victim status and tell me what rights I’m allowed to have.
CNN has sucked all the sympathy for this girl and her classmates away.