Strictly voluntary, of course and if you feel like making idiots crap in their pant for giggles. Open a new list in your account, give it a title and explanation that is mildly disturbing. Here is mine.

A notification is sent to the person that he/she has been added to the list and shows the name and the definition. Just don’t be obvious, calling your list “Corpses I will Send to Odin’s Feast Table.” is a wee bit over the top. Same for the explanation: “I have a shredded called Audrey II.” will put people off, specially if they like musicals.

I am adding any Gun Control asshole that calls for the treatment of the NRA and its members as terrorist or anybody else who wish us and our families death.

“But Miguel! That is ratcheting up the rhetoric.”
They drew First Blood, not me.

It should make for fine hysterics and paranoia. Don’t forget to have a lot of pop corn.

Karen Mallard is running for congress in Virginia.

She contends that she cut the receiver after so what she did was not illegal. That she won’t be arrested and prosecuted by ATF is not the same as not committing a felony crime.

The Randy Weaver Punishment Procedure only applies to non-liberals.

Just got the email notification from the Legislature.

Signed by Officers and presented to Governor.

Officially I am in IDGAF mode.

What did I just say earlier this morning.

I called it.

https://twitter.com/michaelianblack/status/971728996667940864

You can say “but he’s just a comedian, not a politician.”

I will remind you that Hollywood activism had blurred the line between celebrity and politician.  This is a celebrity pushing the Overton Window. 

It’s not enough for them to ban guns. They want to send gun owners to the gulag.

Feel free to share.

Calling the NRA a terrorist organization in no longer just the purview of ex-Clinton staffers spending money on billboards.

Now, perhaps the most obnoxious non-student victim of the Parkland Shooting has joined in the NRA terrorist equivalence.

Father of Parkland victim slams NRA videos:

"If this was put out by a terrorist organization, we would be raising the terror threat level in this country. Why are we letting this lobby have anything to do with DC? I don't understand it!" pic.twitter.com/7tfYM8fAkU

— Evan McMurry (@evanmcmurry) March 7, 2018

The Governor of Connecticut, Dan Malloy chimed in saying that the NRA has become a terrorist organization.

This is not just terrible rhetoric.  There is a purpose to this.

There is a quote, often attributed to Josef Goebbels “if you tell a lie often enough, people will come to believe it.”  There is no evidence that he said it, but it does seem to be true.

I think the end goal of pundits, sacred victims, PACs, and politicians calling the NRA a terrorist organization is to do just that.  Have the NRA defined as a terrorist organization.

The FBI has a very specific definition of terrorism, which the NRA doesn’t meet.  But if the lie is told often enough by important enough people than the momentum can be built to criminalize association with the NRA.

I am fully convinced that what we are seeing is a deliberate push to criminalize the NRA to the point where the five (soon to be six) million members that support the NRA can be prosecuted the same way as someone who supports ISIS or Al Qaeda.

You can call me a tinfoil hat wearing, paranoid, crazy person, but with the absolute level of hate we’ve seen directed at gun owners, I believe they do mean to do us real harm.

Right now, there is nothing they can do because NRA membership is protected by the First Amendment, the right to free association and the NRA is a registered lobbying group.

But if they can make the NRA legally tantamount to ISIS, all of its members are now criminals.

A year ago, maybe you’d be right to call me crazy.  Not today.

I believe this is an act to destroy the Second Amendment by undermining the protections of the First Amendment.

Found via Wirecutter, apparently Nationwide Reciprocity is the death of States Rights.

For libertarians, this bill is not a matter of our Second Amendment right; rather, it’s a matter of federal overreach. Under Concealed Carry Reciprocity, state gun laws would be rendered null and void, as anyone with a concealed carry permit in one state would be able to travel across state lines while armed.

Federal Overreach and the National Concealed Carry Law

Immediately I got worried. Did something got changed in the bill since the last time I checked it out? I rush over H.R. 38’s page and checked the text .  Maybe since IANAL I could not find it in the “extensive” 48 lines dealing with citizens legally carrying a sidearm across state lines. But the article gets better.

A 2017 study indicates that it’s not just those who value state autonomy who are opposed to the bill. A national survey found that 83 percent of Republicans and 84 percent of independents believe that people with a legal right to carry concealed should have to pass a test demonstrating that they can “safely and lawfully handle a gun in common situations they might encounter.”

The underlined passage is a link in the original article that leads to none other than John Hopkins Center For Gun Policy and Research. In case anybody does not know, please take a guess who bought and paid for that department to be created?

If this is the new way of the Libertarian Party, you have indeed become a vote-sucking machine for the Democrats and a bad clown show for whatever Libertarians used to stand behind.