I’m going to be blunt with The New York Times.

In the last few days I have covered a couple things the NYT has done that were obscenely racist towards white people.  In the last year, I’ve covered even more.

This include Sarah Jeong’s Tweets, the NYT’s saying that the white population of New Hampshire (and most of New England) was a problem and needed to be thinned out, and saying that black people cannot be friends with white people because of Trump.

The question shouldn’t be “should Jeong get fired?” but “why the fuck did anyone familiar with her Twitter feed think it was okay to hire her?”

This is the same New York Times that employs a sports writer who ginned up outrage against sportscaster Doug Adler, which ultimately to Adler being fired and having has career destroyed.  What did Adler do?  Described Venus William’s style of play at the Australian Open – fast paced and aggressive – as the “guerrilla effect.”  The Times writer (deliberately) misinterpreted it as “gorilla” and accused Adler of racism and comparing blacks to primates.

Of course the word guerrilla has nothing to do with race, it comes from Spanish, meaning “little war.”  It was in reference to the insurrectionist tactics used by Spanish peasants against the French army in the Peninsula War.  It has come to mean any style that is aggressive and unconventional, such as “guerrilla marketing” in advertisement.

A white man makes an anodyne statement praising a black person using a word that is a near homophone to a great ape and The New York Times essentially makes him unemployable.

An Asian woman takes to social media to equate white people to dogs and celebrates the extinction of white people and she gets put on the editorial board.

The New York Times has made it clear as an institution that they pretty much hate white people and don’t seem to understand just how antagonistic that is to a broad swath of America and what the ramifications are.

So this is me being totally blunt.

Right now I guarantee that there is more than a few white nationalists or white supremacists who are thinking of pulling a Charlie Hebdo over at The New York Times.

If or when that happens, a large swath of Americans is going to mouth pieties about free speech and how “that shouldn’t have happened” but they are not going to shed a tear or really give a shit about a bunch of vitriolic racists getting their comeuppance.

When you are the Paper of Record that sees Antifa beating the hell out of Conservatives on college campuses and at Trump rallies and decided to give them fashion advice instead of condemnation, you’re not going to get much sympathy when some alt-Righter pays you back with bullets.

This is the fire they are playing with, I hope they understand that.

Here is another location with the files in it.

And from buddy and fellow Blogger Sean S.

And a workaround.

Now we done it, they have irrefutable proof we (16 million citizens with permits) are not worthy to carry concealed because 0.0078% of people with permits committed the ultimate of infractions: Murder (Cue somber music.)

As you can imagine I checked the Florida page and check on those 84 people killed according to VPC. Well, there weren’t 84 listed (out of the 1,927,724 CWPs issued that comes at 0.004% of violators) and it is mentioned that the cases they present are “vignettes describe the circumstances for killings not ruled self-defense by private individuals with permits to carry.” By my count there were only 57 distributed the following way:

Homicide and Convicted: 36
Homicide Pending: 10
Suicide: 1
Accidental: 8
Other: 3

I counted suicides in Murder/Suicides as Homicide and Convicted. Same for those shooting where the perpetrator died by police action. Now, out of the number originally given we get info on more than half and only 36 have been convicted or died because of their actions. Violence Policy Center has always added pending judgements to the count to add bulk regardless what the verdict will say later. But add accidental shootings and a suicide as cold-blooded murders? Yes, padding the numbers even more. But I want to present to you one the one that takes the cake. Remember this study is so congresscritters and the public do not allow people with Concealed Carry to go out their little reservations and start shooting buses full of orphans and other massacres. Click on the picture to enlarge and read.

Yes, they included a strangulation in the mix just because the killer had a CWP.

And this is why only fools actually pay attention to this “study” by the Violence Policy Center.

And Alyssa Milano is the latest fool.

And slapping the big irate man is not gonna help your situation.

So just 10 minutes ago I get a message in my Facebook account:

Next, I retried just to post the link and no can do, Bubba.

I even tried our old friend Tiny URL…

So now I am trying this way, the long way. Click here to go to that website Facebook does not want you to visit.

UPDATE: Other links I had posted to CodeIsFreeSpeech.com were also taken down.

If you haven’t been following the Sarah Jeong story, Miguel touched on it earlier this morning.

Right now she is trending on Twitter.

The New York Times released a statement that is total bullshit.

Our statement in response to criticism of the hiring of Sarah Jeong. pic.twitter.com/WryIgbaoqg

— NYTimes Communications (@NYTimesPR) August 2, 2018

Other members of the Leftist media are circling the wagons around her.

https://twitter.com/lpolgreen/status/1025054041150242821

“It’s all the alt-right’s fault this got noticed.  There is nothing to see here.  ”

https://twitter.com/zackbeauchamp/status/1025034038472531969

“This is just the horrible shit minorities usually say behind white people’s backs.  There is nothing to see here.”

Apropos of nothing, I think @sarahjeong is a phenomenal writer, who I learn something new from every time I read her.

— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) August 2, 2018

“She’s a good writer, there is nothing to see here.”

It’s not just the media though, it is the entire social justice community.

Sarah Jeong is being targeted by the white supremacy movement on social media. I will not stand silent about this, no matter the backlash. Asian Americans have been silent for far too long and we should not be shamed into silence forever.

— Eugene Gu, MD (@eugenegu) August 2, 2018

“Criticizing Jeong is racist.”

Just take a blood pressure pill and go though the comments on any one of these Tweets.  The people defending Jeong break down into a few of categories.

1. Her Tweets aren’t racist/are the good kind of racism because white people really are awful.
2. White people are so fragile/are special snowflakes for whining about this.
3. If you were upset about the firing of [conservative writer] you are a hypocrite for wanting Jeong to get fired.

A consistent refrain used in the counter is some variant of “this is how you get Trump reelected in 2020.”

No, it’s not.

This is how you get more Nazis.

Let me be clear on this.  A few of her Tweets really did come within a hair’s breadth of advocacy for white genocide.  Specifically the Tweets about white people going extinct and canceling white people.

What is considered (by the Left) to be American’s most prestigious news paper put on their editorial board a person who did a long tweet thread about how white people stink.

The exact language was used to by Nazis to dehumanize the Jews and to get German children to identify Jews (by their smell).  That exact language was used by segregationists to justify Jim Crow (“we can’t let black people in here, they stink.”)

But since she said it about white people, she gets a six-figure job, prestige, and accolades.

Sarah Jeong is a living, breathing, Tweeting recruiting ad for Stormfront.  Her hiring and being defended by the NYT is evidence that Left leaning media outlets in Democrat rich states truly think that “deversity” means “get rid of the white people.”

This confirms then reaffirms every single thing white nationalists groups have been saying for years.

White Nationalists: “The Liberals hate white people and want to wipe them out and replace them with minorities who also hate white people.”

Liberals: “No we don’t, you’re just paranoid.”

White Nationalists: *Points to NYT hiring of Jeong*

Just yesterday I asked if the media was going to be propagandists or journalists.

Today they answered “We’re going to go with being the Progressve Der Strumer and hire ourselves the South Korean Julius Streicher.”

This isn’t a meme about how you get more Trump.  This is a serious issue about how you get a race war.

I believe with all my heart that the modern and successful fight against those who wanted to kill the Second Amendment came around because the gun community embraced the Internet with all its might.

It was the sudden ability to connect with other like-minded individuals what amalgamated us into fearful force. We were suddenly advising and warning each other about the comings and goings of the Gun Grabbers, what had been successful against them and what had not.

The Opposition had total control over the Traditional Media and it was impossible to wedge in a positive story about guns. But soon enough, the Internet began eroding away the news monolith by being the fact checkers of their willfully erroneous information.  It must have been a shock for Newspapers and TV stations who had entered the Information Highway that they would receive thousands of emails stating the errors and lies they had published. When before people had to sit down, hand or typewrite a letter to be sent to the editor and then mail it, it only took a couple of minutes to fire the same missive from the comfort and quietness of home, only interrupted by the soft clacking sounds of a keyboard.

Our enemies are not fools and they also took to the Internet. But even when they had gigantic financial backing and the best minds that Madison Avenue could offer for sale, they were never able to compete against millions of people disputing the same electronic real state and timelines. They do give it a good try spending bags of cash and pushing interns (paid and otherwise), but simply there is not enough of them and this is a war of attrition. Whoever has the most resources, wins.

And now we have, sorry, had the 3D Printed Guns war. I say had because no matter how much the other team screams, they already know they lost. Once again the great minds from NY Advertising came out, gave the very expensive talking point to the Media Serfdom and tried to scare everybody to think the End Of The World was here (for the umpteenth time) because of guns. And they even managed to get a Judge, a Clinton Appointee in Seattle to issue and injunction against publishing what basically is alphanumeric characters in a piece of electronic memory, easy to copy and distribute. It was a fool’s errand.

The Opposition was chanting victory and dancing in their well, furnished offices when the first news starting to come in: The Rednecks had revolted. Nobody was shot, nobody was injured, no Molotov cocktails had been tossed to damage properties, it was worse.

They had the unmitigated gall to share the “prohibited” files with other online!

Filesharing sites, Peer-to-Peer, blogs, websites social media and even the humble email were being used to transmit the proscribed information. And you can bet that 99% of those getting and releasing the blueprints really do not have the time or money to spend on the good 3D printers, but it was not a question of monetary affordability but of freedom: Can we afford to let these idiots destroy the First Amendment because the hate the Second? The answer for all of us was a resounding NO!

Ours was Civil Rights Insurrection, make no mistake. We were told by a few that blueprints and instructions were verboten, that they needed to be proscribed because the damage that they may do in the wrong hands. And they tried to sell that line of manure to us, the ones that have been hearing it for decades about their magazines, their rifles, their pistols and their shotguns and used as excuse to remove them from out property.

So, they may not admit it yet, but the lost. They lost so bad that baby seals are feeling commiserate about the likes of Alyssa Milano and Shannon Watts. It was a digital blitzkrieg that only awaits the reversal of the temporary injunction a superior court so we can go back to argue about calibers and the best (insert type gun here) for whatever is that you will be doing over the weekend, shooting-wise.

Al Gore (falsely) proclaimed himself the father of the Internet many years ago. If he only knew how was it going to be used against his political kin, he would have choked that baby with the Ethernet umbilical cord at the moment of birth.

And don’t forget: Code Is Free Speech. Go download your copies if you don’t have them yet. Share them with the ones you love and even the same people who tried to kill them.