Last time I wrote about Charolette Clymer it was when she was ignoring the facts about the most recent California school shooting.
This time she decided to use the Pensacola Naval Air Station shooting to push gun control, proving once again, that the facts are irrelevant, she just wants to take your guns.
To bring you up to speed:
‘Barbaric’: Saudi national opens fire on Pensacola Navy base, kills 3, injures 8
A Saudi man training at the Naval Air Station Pensacola opened fire on the base early Friday morning with a handgun, killing three and injuring eight before deputies fatally shot him, authorities said.
The shooter was identified as Mohammed Saeed Alshamrani, a member of the Saudi military, a U.S. official told The Associated Press. The official wasn’t authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity. A motive for the attack is unknown.
The shooting began around 6:30 a.m. CT and the suspect was halted by two Escambia County sheriff’s deputies, who arrived on scene in less than five minutes, Sheriff David Morgan said. An official who was not authorized to speak publicly said that the gunman did not use his military-issued service weapon.
The shooter is a Saudi national and a member of the Saudi military. He would be prohibited by Federal law from buying – or as Miguel pointed out, even using – a gun in the United States.
So where did he get his gun, because I couldn’t have just gone off base and bought one at the local gun store?
Knowing how tight security is around foreign nationals is for training at US installations, I wonder how much free access he had to wander around off-base to find a gun?
Furthermore, Pensacola Naval Air Station still prohibits personal weapons on base, making it a gun-free zone.
None of these facts made any difference to Clymer, who used this attack to call for more gun rights restrictions.
Tell me exactly what loophole or law allowed this to happen, I’m curious.
When she was challenged on this she acquiesced to the fact that guns are not allowed on the base, but people could still smuggle them in.
So someone who will break the law to smuggle a gun onto a military base will obey the law buying the gun? I doubt it considering that the law prohibits foreign nationals from buying guns in the US.
When she was called out on this, she resorted to “but I’m a veteran.”
You know what. Fuck her veteran status. Her status does not give her the right to eliminate the civil rights of American civilians.
Do you know what a system is called when the military has special rights to dominate and restrict the freedoms of the citizenry? A junta. Clymer’s fantasy land is a Progressive junta where Leftists in uniform get to decide what rights the rest of us have. Because she’s a veteran.
And just for good measure, she decided that insulting her opponents intelligence was a good counter to facts.
Nothing about a foreign national getting his hands on a gun in the US and trying to sneak it onto a US military base is legal. There is no passable gun control law that would have prevented this.
But that doesn’t matter, Clymer wants total civilian disarmament because she’s a veteran.
Also, I suspect that this is a coordinated act of terrorism and there is a conspirator in the US who provided this guy with his gun. I’ll continue to monitor this event.
Like this:
Like Loading...