Month: January 2024

The logic of gun free zone advocates

 

If the sign was the proper size, the violent criminal would have obeyed it.

The solution, of course, is to make the sign bigger.  Then, next time, the criminal will see it and obey it.

Works every time, 0% of the time.

How Republicans win

In my post, Do Trumpers want to lose, reader xrayboy left this comment:

How much do you think DeSantis would accomplish in the DC swamp versus Tallahassee. Comparing accomplishments in Florida to getting something done in DC is an apples to oranges thing.

I’ll answer.

Democrats don’t win elections, Republicans lose them.

People need motivation to vote Republican.

Hating the Democrat has been shown time and time again not to be a sufficient motivating factor.

Republicans in large numbers and independents do not go and vote for useless do-nothing Republicans.

When Republicans accomplish Republican victories, Republicans and independents vote for Republicans.

We’re fair weather fans, we support our team when we win.

DeSantis increased the size of the Republican majority in the Florida legislature and the number of Republican voters by getting victories.

The more Republicans do Republican things, the more Republicans win elections.

Trump had shit leadership in DC.

He was terrible at rallying legislators to his side.

DeSantis would have started weak, but if he could accomplish some victories, doing what he did in Florida, it would snowball into gaining a majority in the legislature and accomplishing more things.

Trump was a boss but DeSantis is a true political leader, and that difference is why I think DeSantis would have been much more politically effective than Trump.

Trump’s VP ?

Trump needs a VP that can help him win and with his presidency, so let’s check the choices.

Vivek Ramaswamy: As the joke goes around, he is slated to run the White House’s 7/11, but I don’t see him pulling votes in.

Ron DeSantis: Any Democrat leader not too stupid would fear DeSantis as VP. He pretty much made mincemeat of the Democratic Party of Florida. Injected some spine to the legislature (Needs more) and is much better than Trump when it comes to destroy a Lefty Media attacking him. This comes handy for Trump because the Dems would rather have him as a bamboozled GOP version of Biden than actually remove him as President and make De Santis POTUS. DeSantis as VP will lower the risk of removing Trump from office.

Nicky Haley: The female John McCain by the gushing coming out of CNN. Need I say more? That means Democrats will pursue even harder lawsuits and indictments against Trump.

So, my prediction is: Trump will select Nicky Haley as VP. 

 

PS: Also selecting DeSantis may help bring people like me to the voting booth rather than stay at home. Maybe enough votes to overcome the margin of cheating.

Lawfare, Part n+1

Legal Case Analysis
B.L.U.F.
Mexico sued S&W and other manufacturers. They claim that but for those evil gun makers, the cartels would not have guns.

The district court said, “PLCAA applies. Get the out of my courtroom”.

Mexico appealed, the First Circuit says the case can go on. The price of your firearms just went up, again.
(1400 words)


The first pages of the opinion issued by the First Circuit court tell us that The People have lost another round. It takes nearly 30 pages to find out why, though.

The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) was put in place by a bipartisan congress to stop those anti-gunners that were filing nuisance suits against entities in the firearms’ industry. FFLs and manufacturers, primarily.

Since the PLCAA passed, those same anti-gunners have been trying to find a way around it. On the media front, they make the false claim that “only the gun industry can’t be sued”. This has never been true.

The arms industry is the only industry where people attempt to hold the manufacturer responsible for the acts of a third party. The standard example would be a wife suing Ford because her husband was killed by a drunk driver driving a Ford F-150.

Or worse, suing because her husband was that drunk driver and was killed in a traffic incident which he caused.

It doesn’t make sense. The argument is based on two shaky, and false, foundations: 1) There is no need for guns, 2) If they didn’t make guns, nobody would be killed.

I’m reminded of this quote:

Because the horror of Communism, Stalinism, is not that bad people do bad things — they always do. It’s that good people do horrible things thinking they are doing something great.”

[Six Questions for Slavoj Žižek, Harper’s Magazine, November 11, 2011]

And I’m not sure those who wish to disarm us are “good people”. They do horrible things, though.
Read More

Tuesday Tune

On Saturday, I found I needed a couple of items. Both were produced in China. I placed my order on Saturday evening, and they showed up yesterday by noon.

In the ’70s, my mother would have all of our gifts for her parents wrapped and boxed and ready to ship by early November. We would go to the Greyhound bus depot to ship them to Wisconsin from wherever we were in the country. In general, we could get packages by the Post Office in a couple of weeks.

In the ’60s, you could send a letter to a mail order location and “allow four to six weeks for delivery”.

Earlier, it took longer. The time it took to transport goods was much longer than people think.

We had stage coaches and riders to carry packages and mail before then.

But if you needed to move goods, the way to do it was by sea.

As a sailor, you would sign aboard. The ship would load with goods. The ship would sail to its destination. There it would put in for repairs. You could sign aboard for the return trip or stay.

In the ’70s, I read Two Years Before the Mast. It tells one such story. From the time Richard Dana left Boston in 1934 to California, it was two years before he returned. He published his memoir in 1840, describing his voyages.

Whenever I hear this song, I am taken back to that voyage in my mind’s eye. Fighting to keep a ship afloat in foul weather.

Or the NSFW version:

Larry has an amazing way with words

 

In its entirety:

Seriously, Trumpkins, listen. Regular boring conservatives like me have already said we’ll vote for Trump in the general now that we’re stuck with him because of your hubris. It doesn’t help for you to keep barking at me about how I should deny reality and blow smoke up peoples’ asses about how awesome your guy was and will be. 

Sorry, I’m not a revisionist history ass kisser with memory issues like you guys. It doesn’t do you any good to yell at people who actually paid attention to this shit while it was happening. Besides, I think they’re our employees, not our fucking monarchs, so all this one way loyalty shit you keep going off about makes me want to barf. 

But people like me ain’t your problem. Every R in America could go full Trump Train and we’re still gonna get fucking trounced in the general unless you somehow convince purple swing state Americans in the suburbs that Trump is all that great stuff MAGA believes about him. Which the last few elections have demonstrated they clearly don’t, they kinda hate his guts, and that’s even before he’s a convicted felon, so good luck with that. 

Meanwhile, the rest of us who actually believe in archaic shit like “principles” have been getting mooed at all day to UNITE by a bunch of fucking herd animals, because apparently now we’re all supposed to shut off our fucking brains off and piss away our dignity and buy in on Laura Loomer’s latest batshit fucking crazy conspiracy theory about the Atlantic using numerology to call for assassinations or the Cobra Weather Dominator or some shit, or we are traitors who hate America. 

Anyways good luck convincing those swing state soccer moms! I’m just gonna be over here stockpiling more canned food and ammo awaiting the apocalypse. Then in November I’ll vote for Trump, and when we get fucking rolled because we were dumb enough to walk into the democrat’s obvious trap, I’ll try to resist the urge to say I told you so. 

I’d love to be wrong, and in the off chance Trump wins, I’ll congratulate you for your prescient wisdom, and look forward to four years of Trump hiring more incompetent swampy ass kissers, while keeping my fingers crossed for more decent SCOTUS appointments. 

So you get off my fucking back now. 🙂

 

On red dots on pistols

I got into it on X on my opinion on red dot optics on pistols.

I thought I’d take the time to lay out my complete opinion, based on my experience as a shooter, pistol instructor, and engineer in the arms industry.

I am not anti red dot.

I’m not somr boomer Fudd who thinks they are some fad.  Red dots are here and they are only getting more prevalent.

I just have some reservations and qualifications about red dots, especially on defensive pistols.

My reservations and qualifications break down into two categories: equipment failues and user failures.

For equipment failures, it’s pretty simple.

Red dots are more complex pieces of machinery. They are larger, contain electronic components, and experience more stress. They are more delicate.

We experience many more warranty claims on pistol optics than iron sights.

I’m not saying irons sights are indestructible. They too, experience failures.  I’ve seen irons come loose from dovetails, fiber optic and tritium vials fall out or stop working.

But, in my experience, a set of quality iron sights, properly fit into a dovetail, is about the most robust sight possible.

On a defensive pistol, I want robustness.

If you insist on putting a red dot on a defensive pistol, having a set of backup irons that can be co-witnesses is important.  This is true for rifles as well.

For user failures, I’ve seen a few different things.

First and foremost, are the people who treat dots as a magic pill.  They shoot for shit and believe that by adding a dot, they will become better shooters.

It doesn’t work.  Usually, their fundamental problem is that their trigger control sucks, not their sight alignment.

I’ve seen people adjust their red dots to compensate for hitting a foot low-left at some prescribed distance.

We get warrant service requests from people who maxed out the travel on their dot trying to compensate for flinching.

When I was at Thunder Ranch, everyone with dots started by checking dot zero, and we had one guy who did that. Rob Latham zeroed his dot for him and he had to do a lot of trigger discipline drills.

Second, guys who put a dot on their micro compact carry gun, then continue to drill at three, five, and maybe seven yards.

The advantage to a dot it better accuracy at distance, but these guys generally can’t shoot well, so don’t push themselves outside of their comfort zone.

These guys are not taking advantage of the capabilities of a dot. For them it’s a waste of money.

Third, is the toxic aspect of gun culture.

We’ve all experienced it.

“If you don’t have [latest thing], and you need to use your gun in a defensive situation, just just going to fucking die.”

Latest thing being:

  • Newest plastic fantastic
  • Laser sights
  • Kydex holster/carry position
  • Red dot
  • NODs
  • Next industry toy the IG influencers get

You tell someone you carry a snub nose 38 or a 380 in a belly band, and they will launch into a tirade how if your carry gun isn’t their favorite high capacity wonder-nine with an extended mag, ported barrel, red dot, and weapon light, in a $200 appendix carry hybrid holster, you might as well just shoot yourself because you’ll never win a gun fight with the guy mugging you.

Right now, the debate online isn’t, “is the shotgun still a worthwhile self defense weapon compared to the AR,” but, “how obsolete is the shotgun as a home defense gun and how fast will you die with one in your hands when someone kicks in your door.”

These people have latched onto pistol dots, which is how you end up with a guy running a pistol with a dot no further than five yards.

Lastly, and this is the most dangerous, people who learned to shoot on dot who do not practice with their irons.

I’m starting to see this with pistol.

This has been an issue with rifles for a while, to the point where it affected the military.

Soldiers were being trained on optics because it’s easier. But those soldiers would go to non-combat units where they were not issued optics. Then, they had no capability to shoot with iron sights and would fail qualification, or worse, be in a fire fight with a weapon they didn’t know how to use.

Iron sights are not going away anytime soon, but I’m afraid proficiency with irons will.

At the last match I was at, out of thirty shooters, 28 were carry optics.

As Clint Smith says, be a student of weaponscraft. Don’t be limited because you let a valuable skill atrophy in favor of a new toy.

If you want to run optics on your pistol, I wont stop you.

But understand their limitations, maximize their advantages, and make sure you develop and maintain proficiency for when you have to rely on irons.