I have a feeling that Campus Nazis is going to be a recurring post for a while.

Today’s episode comes from The University of Utah, where protesters wanted to block Ben Shapiro from speaking.

It was pretty stereotypical, with stupid chants, Antifa flags, and kids dressed in all black with their faces covered.

There were two interesting things I noticed in this video.

First, as these kids win on campuses with administrators failing to control the situation, they are becoming more emboldened to say what they actually mean.

You heard that right, the Constitution is not a relevant document.

Not just are these people tyrannical, they are the worst form of tyranny.  They are capricious dictators, there is no fundamental law except what whim they have today, and we all see how fast that changes and how they turn on each other.

The other thing I notices was their leader.

This skinny, gender neutral, pantywaist with his smug grin, nerd glasses, pink sweater, and earring.

This is the leader of the #Resistance.

This is what school administrators are afraid of, and it shows what kind of spineless, gutless, dickless, chicken-shit cowards they are.

These kids win on their campus and so they think they are winning in America.

I want to see this waifish twink actually lead his #Resistance against a bunch of Alabama good-ol-boys, or South Dakota ranchers.  The people that I lived and worked with who put in 40 hours a week of back breaking hard work then go out in freezing conditions to hunt on the weekend.

Guys, who when they say “picked up a tranny this weekend” aren’t virtue signaling about their gender non-discriminatory dating preferences, but mean actually lifting a couple of hundred pounds of gears and clutch pack into and out of the bed of a truck.

These people have no idea what is waiting for them outside of their bubble.

If they try to bring this into the real world, the real world will slam into them like a freight train.

It started with a 1911 I built.  I got a Remington R1 Enhanced and proceeded to stone, hone, and polish every mating surface until it ran like a champ and had a trigger pull like breaking glass.  I then up graded it with Wilson Combat Bulletproof oversize slide release and thumb safety, Novak big dot front night sight and U-notch rear, and VZ grips.

It was too nice to just sit in the safe and occasionally get carried.  It had to come out and play.  It was a fightin’ pistol and so I thought I’d get back into IDPA after a number of years off (thanks Chicago).

I got a buddy of mine from work to join me for IDPA, he was a USPSA shooter some years back and then convinced me to shoot that on the following weekends.

Well, a 0.145 inch front night sight and fixed rear is fasts for a defensive sight, not so accurate at distance.  I was limited by my equipment.

What to do?  Build another gun.

Same platform and most of the same upgrades, then I added a Storm Lake match barrel,  Wilson combat oversize mag release, and EGW mainspring housing and mag well.  The sights are different, a Kensight adjustable rear and 0.100 inch fiber optic front.  I spend hours with a stone and a Dremel with a felt pad and some Flitz and made all the critical surfaces shine like a mirror.

If the first one is for fightin’ this one is for fun.  She is built to fit two categories, IDPA CDP and USPSA Single Stack Major.  This still limits me (I have to shoot 45 ACP and still have to fit in the IDPA box) but not as much.

On Saturday, I took her out and got her feet wet.

The gun is way accurate.  I was scoring A zone hits at good distance.

It does help if I hit all the targets.  On one stage, I totally walked by two that were hiding behind a barrel.  Misses AND procedural FTE’s kicked my score right in the balls.

To be honest, between the two, I prefer IDPA.  I’m still going to shoot USPSA, but as practice for IDPA and not because I feel like ranking in USPSA.  I just can’t get over the strategy, or that fact that after four years of grad level calculus I still can’t figure out hit factor scoring.

I keep getting the same bullshit advice: “you don’t need to concentrate on A hits, you can get some B’s and C’s when shooting major.”

Thanks Mike Charlie-Delta.  That still doesn’t sit well with me.  Yes, I shot that stage in 28 seconds and you shot it in 12, but you didn’t hit fuck all and I shot it clean.  I’m not the fastest, and I won’t ever be, but you are just making noise while running.  So excuse me if “don’t worry about accuracy” is not what you should be telling anyone.

IDPA feels more honest, full 45 or small 9mm, points down are points down.  It’s about stopping the fight and an a big bullet to the love handles isn’t as effective as a small bullet to the vitals.

Also, I get that at a USPSA match I’m only competing against other shooters in my division, but usually I’m the only or maybe one of two or three, shooter in my division.  So I’ll shoot a stage and feel good about my 20 second all A time, and then the next guy is shooting PCC with a 40 round mag and clears the stage in 8 seconds, all A’s and no reloads.  In IDPA the guy with the Glock 17 only has 11 in his gun, so no more than two rounds more than me.  On a long stage, we have the same number of reloads.  On a short stage I have have one and he has none, but our times will still be close.

Don’t take what I’m saying to imply I’m not having fun.  I am.  A lot.  Just that IDPA feels driven more by shooting fundamentals while USPSA has a lot more game strategy, and I prefer the former to the latter.

I’m still going to shoot both, and I will keep pushing faster and faster but with my focus on accuracy rather than score.

I’m just tempted to print a shirt that says “IDPA: Because I don’t bring a calculator to a gunfight” and wear it to a USPSA match.

Maybe that’s too much trolling.

A meeting of the College Republicans at the University of California Santa Cruz was harassed by social justice protesters.

That’s old hat, who cares.

It was caught on tape.  Watch it.  This is critical.

Did you hear the language that they used?

The very existence of these people was a threat to other students.

Think about that.

That College Republicans EXIST is a threat.

Of course, a threat can be defended against with violence

Logically, a student can therefore engage in violence against Republics for simply existing.

These students have gone full Nazi.  Republicans, and presumably anyone right of Social Justice, is an untermensch and cannot be allowed to exist for the safety of the people.

This is a campus kristallnacht in the making.

Once upon a time Maxine Waters was not really on the national radar.  She was consistently one of the most corrupt members of Congress, protected by being an entrenched politician in a gerrymandered district.

Then Donald J. Trump got elected President and Maine Waters’ unhinged calls for impeachment – despite no evidence or justification for such – and constant promotion of the craziest of Russian collusion conspiracies has made her a hero, if not a Patron Saint, of the #Resistance.

I think she is trying to earn a new title “General Maxine Waters.”

She was made a speaker at some gala event in which she said she would “take out” Trump herself.

It seems that she wants to lead the Junta that the #Resistance has fantasies of becoming.

If that happens, I foresee Frederica Wilson being appointed Vice President, since she does has the fashion sense and wisdom of a Socialist African dictator.

The second American Civil War is going to be a hoot.

I can’t wait for statues of General Maxine Waters mounted resplendent on a horse in town squares of The Democratic Socialist Republic of New Yorkifornia.

Usually when I read about calls to ban To Kill a Mockingbird it is for the same reason as to ban The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, namely that both books contain the word “nigger.”

Most recently, a school district in Mississippi has come under fire for their desire to ban To Kill a Mockingbird because the language makes people “uncomfortable.”

Forgive me for believing To Kill a Mockingbird is supposed to make the reader uncomfortable.  The reader is supposed to be distressed about the way Tom Robinson is treated.  That discontent is supposed to motivate the reader to do something to correct this injustice in the real world and consequently the book has been credited for helping to improve civil rights.

Fast forward to 21st century “woke” Social Justice Feminism.

The reason NOT to teach To Kill a Mockingbird is because it hurts women.

Another kind of damage less often discussed is how the text encourages boys and girls to believe women lie about being raped.

In the era where feminists are fighting rape culture, Hillary Clinton says “Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported,” and #MeToo exists as a Twitter trend; a book in which the female fakes a rape claim is just unacceptable.

Mayella Ewell had to believed no matter what.

Congratulations modern feminism, you have just justified the wrongful conviction, attempted lynching, and murder to Tom Robinson.

You should be proud of yourselves, even the Klan couldn’t have done a better job moralizing that.

Julianne Moore appeared on The View.

Of course she opens with condemnation of Harvey Weinstein.

Her statement is hollow and meaningless.  She walked away from a show with Weinstein.  Only AFTER his scandal became headline news.

That is the moral position of Brave Sir Robin.

“Oh shit, Weinstein has become toxic.  His company is headed to bankruptcy.  Run away!!!”

She totally supports his victims.  Not enough of course to say anything BEFORE the scandal hit the news.

From what we have learned from this is that EVERYBODY knew about Weinstein.  Everybody in Hollywood that is.  As long as that stayed in Hollywood it was OK to work with him.

Moore worked with Weinstein on eight movies, of course she knew, but she only condemned him after us normals found out.

Less than two minutes into her interview (1:58 to be exact), The View faints hard left and deflects from actual genuflecting on Hollywood being a sewer or perversion, sexual misconduct, and pedophilia, to talk about gun control.

It’s not about gun control, “its a safety issue.”  Part of Moore’s desire for gun safety is a limit on the number of guns a person can own, which sounds a lot like control to me.

Sure 47 guns in the Mandalay Bay hotel is a lot, but all he needed was one gun and a lot of magazines to do the same thing, cheaper.  There is no evidence that he fired all 47 guns, not to mention that he didn’t have time to.  So what is the point here?  What does limiting the number of guns a person can own have to do with safety?  Nothing.  It’s about control.

Here’s the thing.  I went to my safes, and I counted.  I know people like her have a problem with guns, but they really love to focus on semi autos.  It’s that whole “we’re not coming after your deer rifle” deflection they love to use.

I have fewer semi autos than Harvey Weinstein has sex assault accusers and fewer AR15s than Harvey Weinstein has rape victims.

So forgive me if my response to Ms. Julianne Moore is “just fuck off already.”

I am not about to listen to a member of Hollywood cesspool tell me about how many guns I’m allowed to own while mouthing pities of condemnation of a man whose employment contract allowed for sexual abuse, only after he was publicly outed.

I couldn’t care less about any of their opinions.  They have no more moral high ground from which to argue.

If that didn’t piss you off enough, in prepping for this post I found one other gem from The View.

Way back in 2013, Corey Feldman was on The View talking to Barbra Walters.  Feldman was a child actor who has been open about the culture of pedophilia in Hollywood.  He tried to bring that up during his interview and Barbra Walters.  Shut.  Him.  Down.

That’s really speaking truth to power there Babs.

What the’s first rule of Fight Club? You do not talk about Fight Club.

What’s the first rule of Hollywood? You do not talk about the perverts running the show, even if that means more children get molested.  

These people do not have the right to tell me how to live my life ever again.

Fuck ’em.

Social Justice damaged Hollywood, resulting in 2017 having the lowest box office revenue in over a decade.

Social Justice is destroying football, driving away millions of viewers and hundreds of millions of dollars.

There is barely two months left in 2017, but Social Justice is going to destroy another great American male institution (not the Boy Scouts, they got that too), this time it’s Playboy Magazine.

November 2017 will showcase French, transgender, supermodel Ines Rau as Playmate.

Yep, Novermber’s Playmate of the month is a man.

I guess after years of hocking fake tits, Playboy is going all out and hocking a fake woman.

We now know what finally killed off Hugh Hefner.

SJW Editor: “Hugh, I’d like you to meet our selection for Playmate 2017, Ines.”
Hugh: “Hi.”
SJW Editor: “She’s going to be our first transgender Playmate.”
Hugh: “Fuck it, I don’t want to live on this planet anymore.” *Croaks*

Now that he’s dead, his magazine is going to follow him to its grave.

At least for November, when men say they read it for the articles, you know they aren’t lying.