Just when I think the Coalition to Stop Gun Rights Violence have reached hypersonic levels of shrill , they come along with something even higher.
What awful event has brought the verbal ire of our chap Ladd?
So, a citizen sees an assault with a deadly weapon against a woman, legally intervenes and when threatened by the criminal, produces his weapon and defends himself. But apparently there is a code of location/position according to CSGV which makes shooting from a vehicle somehow morally wrong.
And to Laddite Beth Ritchie, I am sure you would have a different opinion about “vigilantism” if you were to have your face re-arranged by a gun held by a criminal. Are you sure you rather walk the high moral ground and wait for the criminal to finish you up rather than have somebody help you ?
There’s a better one part:
“Nine days before his death, Evanovich, 23, gave an interview on video that an anti-violence group intended to show to at-risk youths.”
Wow. Whom safety do anti-gun crowd cares about?
Nobody’s. They are not about safety but about control.
stupid people. nuff said.
HEY!!!
Criminals can carry CCW,they just don’t have yo get a licence to do so……
Very true. Haynes v. United States