Apparently this was an unarmed “peaceful protester” shot by those evil White supremacists packin’ AR 79s. /sarcasm off>

Click to enlarge and see what’s in the yellow circle. Thanks to Wizardpc for pointing the obvious.

 

Click here for a video of the wounded protester. It is quite graphic

Spread the love

By Miguel.GFZ

Semi-retired like Vito Corleone before the heart attack. Consiglieri to J.Kb and AWA. I lived in a Gun Control Paradise: It sucked and got people killed. I do believe that Freedom scares the political elites.

15 thoughts on “Getting your arm shot is not like in TV (Graphic)”
  1. Let’s just stipulate that I’m not getting any real work done today

    Here’s the first video I’ve found that captures the events right before the first shooting. The video of the shooter getting tackled in the street before opening fire is actually the second shooting. This is the one that kicked off the whole thing.

    https://twitter.com/KittyLists/status/1298483613915181056

    Note that the “unarmed peaceful protester,” the guy that had the red shirt pulled over his head, is chasing the guy with the rifle and throws something at him. Looks like a molotov cocktail but there’s no fire when it hits the ground. Video is not super-great quality.

    1. Earlier I saw video of red-shirt-guy screaming at some boog bois something along the lines of “You ain’t gonna shoot me.” Trying to find that again to see if the shooter was one of the people he was screaming at.

  2. Two things are now happening on Portland Antifa Twitter
    #1 they are convincing each other that the shooter is a cop, or paid by the cops, and was ordered to shoot protesters.
    #2 they are asking for donations so they can fly to Kenosha and be there tonight

  3. And this is why there were so many amputations in war for so long. It takes an experienced trauma team with good equipment to salvage a limb in that condition.

      1. Exactly. In spite of the victim disarmament propaganda, the death of the attacker is NOT the goal of self-defense. The goal is to stop the threat. If displaying the weapon does that, great, no shots fired. If shooting and missing does it, ok, you lucked out but still that’s good enough. Wound the perp and have him lying on the ground, unable to continue the attack — self defense goal achieved.
        Never forget that only about 2% of defensive gun use cases result in the death of the attacker. That is just fine. Don’t allow the bad guys to pretend that 2% is actually 100%.

Comments are closed.