Exceeding a duty to retreat

Miguel posted this video:

His focus was on the fat guy with the bat hitting the person.

Andy Ngo posted another video from Portland:

The common theme between these two videos is that in both cases the people targeted by Antifa were leaving the situation and were being followed and harassed and assaulted while they were leaving.

These people were retreating and Antifa kept persuing.

IANAL but to me, it seems that once you have started your retreat if your attackers continue to follow you and threaten you while you are retreating you have cleared every threshold to justify the use of lethal force.

“I was walking away.  I was leaving the protest.  The followed me and continued to hit me while chasing me.”

It’s not just chasing people.  I’m going to post this video again:

Antifa slammed the door on this woman as she tried to enter her own home, keeping her from retreating into her own house.

I have to agree with Miguel here, this is at the point where good people are going to start shooting Antifa.

Not just are they driving people out of public places, but they are chasing them while they retreat, following them home, and cornering them so they cannot escape.

I’ll also agree with Miguel on this point too, I now have an old police surplus Mossberg 500 that lives in the toolbox of the pickup.  I’ve reached the point where having a long gun outside the home has become part of my in-vehicle EDC gear.

Spread the love

Dwight does not like what I write in the blog.

Dwight left what he thought to be a rather smart and scathing comment about how my blog (emphasis in “mine”) is disappointing him because I do not cover what he wants:

Virtually all of the political garbage that is covered here is of no interest to me. I enjoy reading about gun issues and was originally attracted to the blog because of its title. But the more I stick around the more I see that it’s not so much guns but the politics of guns…and just plain politics…that you all are into here. If the issue doesn’t fit into your politics or once it falls out of your narrative, you don’t like to spend time on it. Which, of course, was my point with my initial comment that pointed out Miguel’s stunning lack of self awareness.

Your implication that if you can drum up more money from your readers, you’ll be able to do more google searches is as transparently insincere as it is ridiculous.

I’m not a troll. I’m genuinely interested in discussing guns and gun issues. Excuse me for point out the obvious that the Baca shooting is a damn good case study in the use of deadly force for those who are interested in such things rather than what Alyssa Milano or antifa is up to today. Which, strangely, you and your co-writer apparently have all the time in the world to write about.

I actually wrote all this as a reply to his comment, but I figured I should not waste it and use it as post fodder

“Virtually all of the political garbage that is covered here is of no interest to me.”
Yet, you keep coming. Masochism?

” I enjoy reading about gun issues and was originally attracted to the blog because of its title.”
I told the people in marketing that it would work… and it did!

“But the more I stick around the more I see that it’s not so much guns but the politics of guns…and just plain politics…that you all are into here.”
Once again: My blog, my rules. Why is this such a difficult concept to understand?

” If the issue doesn’t fit into your politics or once it falls out of your narrative, you don’t like to spend time on it.”
I am also not into the politics West Coast Midget Clown Porn or the sociological differences between brown and white eggs, so no, I am not going to delve into it.

“Which, of course, was my point with my initial comment that pointed out Miguel’s stunning lack of self awareness.”
I already have a wife to nag on me and I bet you are much less fun in bed. Reasons enough to ignore your sad ministrations.

“Your implication that if you can drum up more money from your readers, you’ll be able to do more google searches is as transparently insincere as it is ridiculous.”
So is your bitching. I guess you finally processed the sarcasm?

“I’m not a troll.”
Opinions vary
(Name the movie)

” I’m genuinely interested in discussing guns and gun issues.”
There is a great variety of blogs and sites that carry AK v AR, 9mm v .45 and Glock v 1911. plus the assorted variety of Chest Thumping masturbators. Feel free to visit them and save your time coming here.

“Excuse me for point out the obvious that the Baca shooting is a damn good case study in the use of deadly force for those who are interested in such things”
Are you a lawyer? I already made my opinion clear and I reckon I don’t need to repeat myself 3 times a week just to make you happy. There is nothing much to do but watch the trial and actually check out what Andrew Branca will discuss about it. I am sure he might do analysis of it much better than me or J. Kb can do. He did a phenomenal job with the Zimmerman trial.

“rather than what Alyssa Milano or antifa is up to today. Which, strangely, you and your co-writer apparently have all the time in the world to write about.”
Once again: My blog, my rules. I write what I want about and I don’t owe you a darned thing. You are not entitled to forcing me to write what you want, you may think you do, but it may get sporty if you present that idea to me in real life.

There is the door. Good-bye.

Spread the love

Countdown to the Explosion

A baseball bat is a deadly weapon. Thanks to their de facto immunity, Antifa feels they can get away with everything and soon they’ll murder somebody because they can.

Carry every day, have enough reloads. See if you can accommodate a long gun in your outside-of-home defensive plans.

Spread the love

CSI: Antifa.

I won’t even bother to comment. I’ll let you guys have fun.

And then, the video.

OK, stop laughing now… seriously. You should not mock people with mental issues.

Spread the love