I am pedantic. I learned from the best, a Jewish attorney.
Just the other day I was watching the Aquaman movie. It sucked but I was bedridden after surgery and it was on.
In one scene, a character is describing the Trident as “forged from Poseidon steel” but what they show is red hot molten steel flowing into a trident shaped mold. That’s not forging, that’s open die casting. That pissed me off.
There is a time and a place to be pedantic. The coming gun rights debate is not it.
I can appreciate the argument that we need to be precise in our language but it’s worthless in this case.
Educated Hillbilly on Twitter did a wonderful thread on the ignorance of most of the media when it comes to guns (unrolled for easy reading).
OK… so here’s the deal with journalists raging on twitter about gun terminology, knowing technical facts or proper definitions. Hell how guns even work.
You see most journalists… most not all… are from well to do white families. Most avenues into journalism involve an internship and well. Rich white people can do that.
Most of them are there for going to be from liberal families in blue cities. Not exposed to guns in any way. And very isolated in experience to people who have grown up with guns.
Being rich and liberal and white means they’ve had their way most of their life. They get what that want. Many are legacy admits to Ivy schools…. Hi @mattyglesias ?
So not much has been earned and they aren’t used to getting pushback especially from their lessors. Now add to the mix of this hyperinflated ego an easy major. And yes I’m going to offend some people here but Philosophy and Engineering aren’t equal. One is hard & one isn’t.
So you have an entitled, white, liberal who now thinks they’re the smartest person in any room because they excelled at an easy major in a school they slid into. Look there’s a reason most journalists don’t have medical, engineering, STEM, etc degrees. Those are really hard.
Now we get back to guns. This hyper inflated ego who thinks they’re smarter than anyone in the room suddenly is getting owned by rural high school educated folks online. Like…. really owned.
These fragile egos can’t take that. They’re the smart one. They went to (insert bragging college here) and god dammit their thoughts and opinions are worth 1000x that of some hick who [lives] in rural America.
So what do they do? Every time they put out a tweet (that in their mind might as well be gospel) they get hammered with people pointing out all the technical mistakes in the tweet. Well they can’t have that.
So what do these fragile millennials do? Learn about guns? Talk to people who own & live with them everyday? Of course not. They stomp their feet & throw a hissy fit & say being knowledgeable about guns is unnecessary.
This is absolutely spot on, not just for “journalists” or media types, but for the Hollywood celebrity activists, youth “victim” activists, and frankly most of the sheltered anti-gun Left.
We think that making points like “an AR-15 is semiautomatic, so it fires one round for every pull of the trigger” and “functionally it is no different than the 10/22 used for target practice or Remington 7600 used for deer hunting.”
Those might be valid for people who care about making good law.
These people are not interested in making good law and they are not interested in debating in good faith.
Not a single one of these activists or journalists will ever say “You make a good point, I wanted to ban AR-15’s until you explained that it works just like the old 1100 I used to go trap shooting with my grandpa.”
They don’t want us to have the AR-15 or the 10/22 or the 1100 or anything else.
We can’t allow ourselves to get lost in the pedantic weeds trying to educate people on details that they really don’t want to know or wouldn’t change their minds if they did know.
We need to focus on the big picture, which is that blanket bans of any kind are ineffectual at preventing crime and a violation of the rights of the innocent.
Like this:
Like Loading...