The interview with Juror B29 was all the rage…for about 8-10 hours yesterday. Still one quote from that interview is fueling the passions on both sides:
. Out of the bat. I have no idea what was in that woman’s mind when she gave the contradictory interview or if she was inoculating herself against being targeted by the “progressive” side threatening to kill anybody related with this case on the Zimmerman side (which reminds me, there is a group of Zimmermans down here in SoFla, unrelated to George and that you should really, really avid the hell out of them if you are into Social lynching “Justice” for Trayvon.)
Like the intwerview or not, the juror did what she was supposed to do: weigh the evidence and decided if the State had proved its case beyond a Reasonable Doubt. Yet, some appear to have issues with the way the Justice System is set, namely CSGV Minions & Fans:
Michelle Singleton She literally could’ve and should’ve hung that jury but no now a babykiller us free.Smh.Unbelievable!
Kathy Abbott People who are on the jury need to by-pass all the mumbo-jumbo and go with what they believe!! The law is the law, and your belief is YOUR belief.
Sue Rolfe she didn’t have to vote not guilty.
Cindy Wilkinson Rines How do you get not guilty? He shot an unarmed teen and killed him, sound guilty to me. I didn’t realize it was ok to stalk and shoot someone at close range. A woman being beaten or raped can’t getaway with that! (GFZ:This is perhaps the one loaded with the biggest irony)
Robbie Sanchez Then she should have held out for the “GUILTY” verdict, too late for excuses..
Chuck Shea These women jurors let America down. Just maybe the next victim of gun violence will be one of their families.(GFZ: Wishing ill, always a crowd pleaser)
Pat Dangerfield If she felt that way the she could have changed the out come what a poor way to know express your guilt
Carol Cuoco Pough I think juror B37 had influenced them. Sorry… but a lot of women don’t always think for themselves– unfortunately they can be influenced. I am a woman I know how they can be. I would not have let anyone influence me. What’s right is right. Period. (GFZ: The “Women are stupid” explanation, and that comes from another woman.)
Kevin Leo Smith i’ve got mixed feelings about this juror, and the others of course.
they/her didn’t actually have to prove intent to convict. and if she really felt so compelled to vote guilty, she should have stood her ground. wth
Only a very small minority of commentators reacted against any infringement of the Jury process.
Ken McNamee It appears that opinions in this day and age are merely composed of a superficial or nonexistent understanding of the facts and an abundance of moral outrage. I suppose the outrage gets better ratings than the understanding.
Judy Coleman What B-29 believes is immaterial. She needed to vote on whether the prosecution proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecution really did a lousy job. However, B-37 went into the trial convinced beforehand that “George” was not guilty.
Although alarming, it is not unexpected. The people who have displayed a disregard for the Second Amendment, find themselves applying the same disregard for the rest of the Constitution and we have seen this over and over again with CSGV and its Minions.
Also, and as point to ponder: Jury Nullification. Would you imagine a Jury composed of idiots like above deciding what Gun Laws and Self-Defense laws should or should not be on the books? A scary thought.
Like this:
Like Loading...