I don’t know what surprised me the most: The fact that epidemiologist are calling the conclusion biased (as in politically biased) or that is being published by a Old School Media source like a TV station.

HUNT VALLEY, Md. (SBG) — Some epidemiologists describe a government study comparing vaccine and natural immunity as potentially biased.

The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, recently tweeted that people who were unvaccinated and had a prior COVID-19 infection “were 5X more likely to have COVID-19” than those who were vaccinated without natural immunity. She referred to an Oct. 29 CDC study that examined patients who were hospitalized with “COVID-19–like illness.”

Despite the conclusion one might draw from Walensky’s tweet, the CDC study isn’t designed to answer the question of whether vaccine immunity or natural immunity is superior. Harvard Medical School professor Martin Kulldorff, an epidemiologist and biostatistician who now serves as senior scientific director of Brownstone Institute, writes that the study instead answers the question of “whether vaccination or Covid recovery is more related to Covid hospitalization or if it is more related to other respiratory type hospitalizations.”

Experts identify potential bias in CDC natural immunity study | WZTV (fox17.com)

Basically is saying that the director of the CDC tried to knit a sweater when she only had two pieces of lint and no needles and we are supposed to believe it.

Spread the love

By Miguel.GFZ

Semi-retired like Vito Corleone before the heart attack. Consiglieri to J.Kb and AWA. I lived in a Gun Control Paradise: It sucked and got people killed. I do believe that Freedom scares the political elites.

7 thoughts on “The CDC is starting to be openly challenged.”
  1. Bout damn time. The cdc has been known to lie in the past. Look at thier “gun control studies” from years ago. Out n out lies. Amazing how stupid America has become. This whole thing was nonsense from the beginning

  2. At the beginning of this Covid saga I remember being po-pood here for saying that FDA, CDC, NIH etc were incompetent bureaucratic institutions.

    That was when I still had some faith in them and thought them misguided, but benign.

    That was before two years of revealed fraud and callous sacrifice of human life and health for the purpose of their personal political and monetary gain.

    Regulatory capture does not fully describe the criminal conduct of medical/scientific establishment.

    My grandmother used to say: “In Stalin’s time, they would have being shot”.

      1. Oh fu… I just learned these mrna mfu…ers did pseudouridin substitutions, thus eliminating tlr viral immuno recognition pathways, plus decreasing b cells.

        Plus pseudouridin rna fucks up own mRNA…
        This platform should not be used in humans for ANythin. Nothing. Nada.

        But no, that is not enough, they did codon modification, resulting in misfolded mRNA, resulting in codon ablution, without active metabolite identification.

        In plain language, nobody knows what shit proteins are produced there (an unidentified unknown verity) and FDA did not ask to check. What antibodies are produced to these proteins?
        And no, Elisa is not enough…

        And they want this shit in kindergarteners?????

        Pardon for the rant.
        This is simply criminal.

Login or register to comment.