Wide margin of voters support key element of Florida sex education bill, poll finds

A wide margin of American voters support banning the teaching of sexual orientation and gender identity to students from kindergarten to third grade, a key element of Florida’s controversial sexual education bill, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.

Fifty-one percent of Americans who responded to the poll say they support “banning the teaching of sexual orientation and gender identity from kindergarten through third grade” while 35% are opposed, representing a 16-point margin. Also, 52% of respondents say they supported limiting the same type of discussion in other grades based on how “age-appropriate” they are.

So despite a massive and unified media campaign against the bill, and the POLITICO poll calling the bill by it’s inaccurate media appellation, it still got majority support.

Americans don’t like grooming children but the radical Left is intent on doing it anyway.

I’m glad polling like this is comming out and the tide is starting to turn.

Child groomers need to understand,we are not locked in here with them, they are locked in here with us.

And if they want to die on the hill of being allowed to groom children, I am happy to oblige them with woodchippers.

“It means the world to be here.”

Lia Thomas spoke about swimming in the NCAA women’s championships. pic.twitter.com/aP0afVA0KE

— SportsCenter (@SportsCenter) March 18, 2022

I absolutely will not submit to this.

This is a dude.  He does not belong on a women’s swim team.

I will not accept saying things I know are factually wrong because some fraction of influential society wants me to.

2 + 2 = 4

There are four lights.

And that dude brought a dick and balls into a women’s sport.

We need to push back.

We must push back.

Every G-d damn day feels like an episode of The Twilight Zone.

I saw this Tweet:

One was designed to be practical for average suburban folks to carry stuff on a regular basis. The other was designed to make guys feel like they are tough and rule the road. pic.twitter.com/qGSDA0BvbK

— Peter Flax (@Pflax1) March 12, 2022

If you go into the threat it is full of like-minded twats who feel a deep compulsion to tell you what you should want and what you should be allowed to have, and do so entirely from ignorance.

There were several who insisted that if you really needed a pickup, one of those Japanese mini-trucks (the kind that are not street legal in the US) is just as good as an F-150 because thr bed lengths are nearly the same.

Yup. And the thing is, the smaller truck has 90% of bed length (the useful part) as the bigger truck pic.twitter.com/SNvxufs2GJ

— ben doherty (@bendoherty161) March 13, 2022

I’m not going to tell you what sort of truck you should have.

I have two, a big 2500 and a smaller Toyota.

I love them both for different reasons.

And as an American, it’s my prerogative to spend my money how I want.

(I agree with the great Iowahawk that there should be a 2A for cars and personal transportation.)

But as a friend reminded me, the great Robert A. Heinlein wrote in The Moon is a Harsh Mistress:

“Thing that got me was not her list of things she hated, since she was obviously crazy as a Cyborg, but fact that always somebody agreed with her prohibitions. Must be a yearning deep in human heart to stop other people from doing as they please. Rules, laws — always for other fellow. A murky part of us, something we had before we came down out of trees, and failed to shuck when we stood up. Because not one of those people said: “Please pass this so that I won’t be able to do something I know I should stop.” Nyet, tovarishchee, was always something they hated to see neighbors doing. Stop them “for their own good” — not because speaker claimed to be harmed by it.”

Fine, I want to fight fire with fire.  And one fire of the Left is to impose taxes as a punitive measure against things they don’t like.

I don’t like busy body twats who want to tell you how to live.

So I will impose a tax.  Every time a busy body twat does something like this they get taxed and that money subsidizes the purchase of an assault rifle, high capacity magazine, big block V8 pickup, or whatever else the busy body wants to eliminate because they are a miserable twat.

Update:

This proves my point.

https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1503785848411770883

Yglesias is a Harvard educated writer for Vox.

His goal at family gatherings is to get his hard working, salt of the earth, rather father in law to shit on guys who drive pick-ups in the suburbs.

The idea being the typical Leftist appeal to authority fallacy.

I.e.: This man is a farmer. I, the Leftist writer, have decided that he qualifies to own a big truck for work.  I will use him as an authority to declare that suburbanites so not need the same kind of truck he does.  If the farmer days you don’t need a truck, you don’t need a truck. 

Fundamentally I ask, why the fuck is it Matt Yglesias’ business what you or I choose to drive if we can afford it?

It’s not.

But Yglesias cannot help himself.  He must be a busy body that that must be the arbiter of who does and who does not need a truck of a certain kind.

My tax will bankrupt Yglesias and I might even possibly annull his marriage for being a that of a son in law.

I guess we know why this Administration selected her.

This massive thread from Senator Josh Hawley:

I’ve been researching the record of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, reading her opinions, articles, interviews & speeches. I’ve noticed an alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson’s treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children

— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) March 16, 2022

Here is it unrolled for easy reading:

I’ve been researching the record of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, reading her opinions, articles, interviews & speeches. I’ve noticed an alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson’s treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children

Judge Jackson has a pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes, both as a judge and as a policymaker. She’s been advocating for it since law school. This goes beyond “soft on crime.” I’m concerned that this a record that endangers our children

As far back as her time in law school, Judge Jackson has questioned making convicts register as sex offenders – saying it leads to “stigmatization and ostracism.” She’s suggested public policy is driven by a “climate of fear, hatred & revenge” against sex offenders

Judge Jackson has also questioned sending dangerous sex offenders to civil commitment. We have a civil commitment law in Missouri, and it protects children

It gets worse. As a member of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Judge Jackson advocated for drastic change in how the law treats sex offenders by eliminating the existing mandatory minimum sentences for child porn

Judge Jackson has said that some people who possess child porn “are in this for either the collection, or the people who are loners and find status in their participation in the community.” What community would that be? The community of child exploiters?

Judge Jackson has opined there may be a type of “less-serious child pornography offender” whose motivation is not sexual but “is the challenge, or to use the technology.” A “less-serious” child porn offender?

In her time on the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Judge Jackson said she “mistakingly assumed that child pornography offenders are pedophiles” and she wanted “to understand this category of nonpedophiles who obtain child pornography.”

On the federal bench, Judge Jackson put her troubling views into action. In every single child porn case for which we can find records, Judge Jackson deviated from the federal sentencing guidelines in favor of child porn offenders

In the case of United States v. Hawkins, the sex offender had multiple images of child porn. He was over 18. The Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of up to 10 years. Judge Jackson sentenced the perpetrator to only 3 months in prison. Three months.

In United States v. Stewart, the criminal possessed thousands of images of child porn and also hoped to travel across state lines to abuse a 9-year-old girl. The Guidelines called for a sentence of 97-121 months. Judge Jackson sentenced the criminal to just 57 months.

In United States v. Cooper, in which the criminal had more than 600 images and videos and posted many on a public blog, the Guidelines called for a sentence of 151-188 months.

Judge Jackson settled on 60 months, the lowest possible sentence allowed by law.
In United States v. Chazin, the offender had 48 files of child porn, which he had accessed over a period of years. The Guidelines recommended 78-97 months. Judge Jackson gave him 28.

In United States v. Downs, the perp posted multiple images to an anonymous instant messaging app, including an image of a child under the age of 5. The Guidelines recommended 70-87 months. Judge Jackson gave him the lowest sentence allowed by law, 60 months

In United States v. Sears, the sex offender distributed more than 102 child porn videos. He also sent lewd pictures of his own 10-year-old daughter. The Guidelines recommended 97-121 months in prison. Judge Jackson gave him 71 months.

In United States v. Savage, the sex offender was convicted of travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, and also admitted to transporting child porn. The Guidelines recommended 46-57 months. Judge Jackson gave him 37.

This is a disturbing record for any judge, but especially one nominated to the highest court in the land. Protecting the most vulnerable shouldn’t be up for debate. Sending child predators to jail shouldn’t be controversial.

So far, the Sentencing Commission has refused to turn over all Judge Jackson’s records from her time there. In light of what we have learned, this stonewalling must end. We must get access to all relevant records.

So Biden’s SCOTUS nominee is a Jew hating, pedophile lover who goes easy on child sex criminals and traffics in Black Hebrew Israelite conspiracy theories.

By the standards of the new Progressive Democrat party, she’s a keeper.

A perfect representation of what they stand for now.

Do what must be done.

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1503728487840063491

That’s the end of the American century.

First Saudi Arabia accepts Yuan, then the rest of OPEC accepts Yuan, and petro-dollars are no longer American dollars, and the US Dollar is no longer the world’s reserve currency, and then the American economy collapses as the Dollar goes the way of the Papiermark.