Month: May 2013

About the gorramed Muzzle Safe Points.

Is it really that hard to figure out the “solution” to this “problem?

Ladies and Gents: It is all CoF Design. Make sure that you adapt the Course of Fire to the safety needs and available space. Any CoF Designer knows that what’s on paper and what ends up being set up may change drastically. If possible, move the points farther away from the targets so the shooter has more leeway. Muzzle SAFE points are for SAFETY, not to piss a shooter off or make it a contest on which SO can give more procedurals.

Example:
Muzzle Safe 1Is this a CoF with the darn Muzzle Safe Points too close? Shall we call HQ and demand that the rule book be shredded and the Tiger teams tar and feathered? No. We can do something as simple as this:
Muzzle Safe 2Whoa! Where did that come from? Could it be that simple?

The safe point on the left is to avoid putting extra holes in the wall as the range management frowns on that and get really miffed when shooters start chipping away the darn thing and usually means you don’t get to shoot there anymore. The one on the right could even be placed a bit farther but there is another CoF being run just outside the pic, so that is good enough for demonstration purposes.

PS: If you have the blessed luck to shoot in a range with bays, specially of the 270 degree variety and are still bitching about muzzle safe points….

The New IDPA Rule Book: Assorted stuff I forgot.

-As properly pointed out by Rob, The Springfield XD family has now moved to the SSP neighborhood. The Glock Families are crying “There goes the Home Owners Association!” The rest of the DA/SA and DOA families will still stay in the Trailer Park area of SSP.

-Clarified the term “Engaged.”  No more, “But I engaged it! I shot at the neighborhood in where the target is located with one bullet!”

-Keep the reloads where you want them except the mouth, armpit and upper pockets.

R19.5 No weak hand drawing from the holster is allowed. Not sure on this one. Does that mean you cannot reach across with your weak hand to the strong side holster  or you cannot have your gun in a weak side holster and shoot like that? I would not mind doing a match or two drawing and shooting from the weak side.

-Flashlight remains a separate object and justifiably so. Weapon-mounted lights are becoming popular but not yet mainstream.

-“In case of doubt, the best score goes to the shooter.” Still here and a good thing.

– Threat and Non-Threat indicators are not hard cover. We had some issues in the past with this.

-Threat indicators of different kinds have equal threat value. (gun not better than knife not better than stick) Easier to design and avoids the Tacticool arguments.

-No modifications to the score sheets after they leave the Score Keeper’s hands. The stories i have about this sh….stuff.

-Calibration of Reactive targets. Not only it has to be calibrated to the lowest power factor in IDPA (105)  but the complaining shooter has to have his/her rounds Chrono’ed and subject to applicable penalties if not in spec. MUHAHAHAH!

– More Boolits! If your gun has 7-6 round capacity, you can carry three spare mags or speedloaders.

-First Target and Last Target cannot be Non-Threats. And the last Target cannot disappear. Likes!

-Moving target cannot be painted with Hard Cover. Awwwww..Damn It. but that is the prick in me.

-And a major round of Kudos to IDPA for the Permanently Physically Disabled Shooters Rules. Flexibility and cordiality must be afforded to them.

OK, that’s it. Go download and read the rest yourself.

On the Obama Administration tracking ASSociated Press’ phones.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department secretly obtained two months of telephone records of reporters and editors for The Associated Press in what the news cooperative’s top executive called a “massive and unprecedented intrusion” into how news organizations gather the news.

via Gov’t obtains wide AP phone records in probe.

The Government has the right to keep track of what its employees are doing. Sheesh! I really don’t know what the problem is with this thing. It was not like they were checking their Tax records or were in need of evacuation from an attacked embassy.

You all just hate Obama…. bunch of racists!

Facepalm of the Week: We won so we issue death threats?

This past week, Kutztown students, faculty and staff were first learning of the university’s new weapons policy which opens the campus to guns. The new policy, according to the Morning Call, will give ”Kutztown more gun freedom than most of the state-owned universities, even more than the sample policy suggested by the state’s attorneys,” despite statements to the contrary by the university’s president, Javier Cevallos. It didn’t take long before the radical, pro-gun playbook showed its ugly face. Shortly after he first heard about the policy under consideration at an April meeting of Kutztown’s Administrative Council, the president of the faculty union, Dr. Paul Quinn, began receiving anonymous death threats

via Next Page in Pro-Gun Playbook at KU: Death Threats | Raging Chicken Press.

Gun rules get relaxed on campus which is what gun owners wanted. But apparently for these twisted souls, death threats only come from Gun Owners. You need to suspend common sense to buy this load.

Logic died a little today.

 

The New IDPA Rulebook: I actually read the darn thing.

Since it was released, I read in some places of the Interwebs that this set of rules is the equivalent of the Nazi extermination laws. I even read somebody accusing Joyce Wilson of being a dictator! Lots of misinformation has been spread and I have no idea why…well, I do, some people may have not liked losing certain gaming edge and are royally pissed about it. And please, if you gonna argue about any of the points I made, make sure you have read the new rules at least twice and do not depend on what the guy who sells the ice cream to your brother-in-law said he read in some blog.

First: IDPA remains IDPA and did not become USPSA Light which was the fear many had. Round count, distances and the basic designs for a Course of Fire remain pretty much the same. I see an increase on safety rules and clarifications that can only improve our sport, specially with the influx of new and inexperienced blood we had lately. A Club/Match Director/Safety Officer/Shooter that bitches about this or does not have it to bring new shooters into a safe way to shoot the sport should do everybody a favor and quit IDPA. How serious is HQ about safety? It even recommends the minimums for Ear & Eye Pro.
S3: IDPA recommends that hearing protection have a minimum 21dB NRR rating and that eye protection have a minimum ANSI Z87.1 impact rating and side shields.
This sets pretty much the tone for the rest of the safety measures.

A big soulful howl was heard about Muzzle Safe Points and the 180 rule. OK complainers, seriously, What kind of club have you been shooting at? And no, you are not gonna get an instant DQ if you get too close to a Muzzle Safe Point as it takes three screw ups to send you home and frankly, if you don’t get the info the first time, you shouldn’t be at the range to begin with. And if the CoF Designers are too damn dumb to come up with a stage that does not have a target riding on top of the Muzzle Safe Point, maybe it is time to find a new one.

The new rule book has a ton of clarifications from the old one and yes, there are some things on this version that need either clarification or re-writing but that is why we are having a comment period. The definition of old esoteric things like “engaged” and FTDR or even what are now the two (2) types of reloads for IDPA are greatly welcomed. I particularly like the fact that a call for Cover is officially just something nice to do for the shooter and not an SO obligation. Some are gonna be mighty surprised about all those accumulated procedurals at the end of a CoF.

Then we have the “STOP TOUCHING ME!” complaint I heard/read in some places. Apparently people will die unnecessarily because HQ says it is OK to physically stop an unsafe shooter from having a dangerous moment. People, we are not talking about tackling somebody to the ground but simply stopping a shooter from becoming one with the ground or a bullet from becoming part of somebody else internal organs.  The people I heard complaining about this have either shoot with super-duper ultra experienced shooters or the Safety Officers are not doing their jobs (and that is scary crap right there.) Any SO who has had any dealings with very New Shooters probably had to stop or control the movements of at least one person during his tenure.  It is not uncommon that a shooter is so concentrated on the stage that fails to hear a STOP command and a simple touch (not a knee clipping or body checking) will result on the shooter coming back to his/her senses and the SO controlling a potentially dangerous situation. But I suspect that the real reason for the outrage is that the shooters do not get a reshoot if the SO touches them and then get a a Procedural.  I suspect that part of this rule change comes from some less-than-honest-Gamers that have actually bumped or forced an SO to contact if they feel they are having a bad run in a particular CoF…and yes, I have seen it happen.

The third thing that is sending people into the cliff and commit suicide is the new definition and Classifier times for SSP. If you listen carefully, you can hear the wailing of those who find two seconds difference between ESP and SSP unfair. Example: The before times to make Master in SSP was 98.82 and for ESP was 89.41. The new times are now 91.00 for SSP and 89.00 for ESP. You could do marksman in SSP by shooting 210.00 or better before, but now you must achieve 191.01 or better which is the same time for ESP.  As it says in the new rule book: Changed to make SSP closer to ESP since their performance in standards stages and scenario stages are similar. Which is a nice way to say that if you have been shooting a Glock 34 with a two-pound trigger, you are closer to a 1911 in 9mm than a venerable Beretta 92 that also belongs to SSP. Those of us shooting DA/SA or DAO have been sucking the difference in equipment forever so it is no skin off our teeth.

We also have the “This is not a circus” rule:
SC19. Non-inclusive list of dis-allowed targets:
Bowling Pins, Texas Star, Plate Rack, Polish Plate Rack, Dueling Tree, Slider Triple Dropper, Golf Balls, Balloons, Eggs, Cowboy Poppers, IDPA Practice Target, Animal Shaped Steel Targets, Tombstone Popper, Coffin Popper, and other similar targets including other novelty targets, etc.

Some stages were getting to be pretty much a carnival’s shooting gallery that did not reward defensive shooting but looked more like an episode Impossible Shots.

And to end this already long post, kudos to the teams who came up with the rules of conduct for all IDPA members: From shooter to Area Coordinator. If it only helps down the level of whining at matches, it will be a well accepted rule. You are an adult, engaged in a sport with rules and it behooves you to abide by those rules.

PS: I almost forgot the Range Lawyer Rule A.K.A. The Appeal Process. Just the $100 fee for filing the appeal at a sanctioned match will make any Match Director happy knowing the level of BS will be kept to a minimum.

PS2: Go read rules… yes, I know you lazy bastard have not done it yet.

Was Gun Control the tipping point for the Obama Administration?

I commented in the past that this administration was spending way too much political capital on Gun Control and it may come back to haunt them. The “old” scandal of Benghazi and the new revelations of the IRS targeting groups opposing the President during the re-election has some in the media spreading their bets and actually paying attention to the proceedings plus adding some words of faux indignation till the weather vane indicates how’s thing gonna blow.

Some are asking for impeachment and truth be told I don’t see that happening. Short of a Youtube video showing the Prez running naked through the White House lawn with tinsel decorating his parts and him shooting at babies with an “assault weapon,” nobody in Congress or D.C. will have the stomach to go with the Articles. However we might see not a Lame Duck but Quadriplegic one, incapable of doing nothing more than exuding one Executive Order after another, each worst than the first and constitutionally challenged. Executive Orders are bad, but they have the advantage of being easily nullified by another Executive Order.

For our side, no matter how rosy things may appear, we cannot afford to lower our guard. We cannot afford to lose the House next year and we have to conquer the Senate to make sure we keep things quiet at a Federal level. And please, do not ignore the lessons of Colorado where we got shellacked and it is gonna take an extra dose of hard work to clean that mess. Keep a tight eye on your State’s legislature, make it a rule to check what kind of idiocy is being paid by Bloomberg’s money and don’t stop challenging the Media and the Gun Control groups.

Our noise is louder.

New Orleans Mother’s Day parade: We need Gun Control ’cause police will protect us.

Chief Serpas announced in a press conference earlier on Sunday that the youngest victim is believed to be a 10-year-old girl. Police say she suffered a graze wound, WVUE Fox 8 reported.

Officers were interspersed with the marchers, which is routine for such events. As many as 400 people joined in the procession that stretched for about 3 blocks, though only half that many were in the immediate vicinity of the shooting, Serpas said.

Serpas said that the procession had been accompanied by officers, who saw two or three suspects run from the scene in the city’s 7th Ward.

via As many as 19 injured in shooting at New Orleans Mother’s Day parade | Fox News.

That worked well.

You cannot predict Evil, you cannot prevent it all the time and no police presence will guarantee your safety. That doubles down when the force assigned to protect you is one of the (if not the most) corrupt organization behind a shield.

Yes, the Gun Control groups lied. But that is nothing new.