Andrew Gillum comes out

It was sucking the meth pipe that pissed us off, not sucking dick.  Florida owes God a collective Novena that this sucker lost and was not in charge during the Wuhan V. crisis.

PS: How many members of the press, both Floridian and national probably knew about his addiction but chose to keep quiet? Think about that one.

Spread the love

The forcible take of the White House

Just saw this in Twitter:

I understand that my command of the English language may not be closet to efficient, but my understanding of the word “siege” is that it is not a peaceful endeavor. So i checked with Merriam-Webster before they decided to do another MinTruth edit to their dictionary:

So siege by definition is a violent military action and in Liberal-Speak, “peaceful protest” has come to mean violent rioting.  This is nothing but an open threat. What happens in November when Trump gets re-elected? Are they going to accept the results, collect their things and go home? Or is it that they will push forward and violently into the White House?

Because at the end of the day, that the objective of a siege: To forcefully take over a location.

Maybe the Democrats are trying to relive history circa 1812?

 

Spread the love

Less lethal apparently doesn’t apply to future generations

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Better get a tourniquet on that, quick.

It may currently be illegal to make good commies out of these Antifa punks, so I fully endorse this method of preventing future generations of violent protesters.

All that soy must have made that a really small target to hit.

Good shootin’ Tex.

Spread the love

That’s a nice country you have there, it would be a shame if Biden weren’t President of it

The Left has gotten shameless in their threats.

Real law-and-order Republicans would not bow to threats of violence and extortion.

This is tantamount to hostage taking by a mob.

If this is the plan, we’re going to need more ammo.

The Democrats can’t use a mob veto on an election.  If they do, our Democracy is over.

Spread the love

Gal Gadot is too sexy but Twerking 11-year-olds is art… explain to me why I shouldn’t assume that the Left is a cabal of pedophiles

In the last couple of days, I’ve seen several Left-leaning sites defend the Netflix release of the Sundance award-winning film Cuties.

Defenders of Hollywood keep sending the message “don’t judge it until you see it.”  (WaPo and the New Yorker said the same thing)

Apparently the controversy is from the Netflix description:

Additionally, Vulture reports, the description on the film’s Netflix page read at the time, “Amy, 11, becomes fascinated with a twerking dance crew. Hoping to join them, she starts to explore her femininity, defying her family’s traditions.”

One dance routine has been posted online.  I’m not linking it here.

The original reviewer was deleted but a screenshot was captured an posted online.

That is disgusting.

Now let me remind you that when Wonder Woman came out, the Left was up in arms that the costume Gal Gadot was wearing was overly sexual.

A costume, by the way, that covered more of Gal Gadot than the costumes these girls wore for their dance routine.

So I just want to see if I understand the situation.

A 32-year-old woman doing stunts in a mini skirt and corset is overly sexual, the director is a misogynist for the costume, and we are bad people if we go to see the movie…

But…

A group of 11-year-old girls simulating intercourse in spandex short-shorts and sports bras is art that you should see before you criticize it, and if you do criticize it you are a xenophobic, misogynist, racist knuckle-dragging reactionary because it is a French film made by a Senegalese Muslim woman.

From this, I might be inclined to believe that Hollywood press and critics are a bunch of pedophiles trying to normalize their perversion.

But I keep being told that is something in the realm of a 4Chan conspiracy theory.

Spread the love

CNN flacking for an attempted murderer

Gaige Grosskreutz was interviewed by CNN on 9/11.  I missed it at the time because of everything else that was going on.

Of course, CNN would make Grosskreutz the sympathetic character.  They are a Leftist hack propagandist organization.

Video from that night showed how Grosskreutz approached Rittenhouse with his hands up then drew his weapon before getting his bicep blown away.

That wasn’t acting as a medic trying to help someone, that was an attempt at murder.

I also pointed out before that one of Grosskreutz’s friends posted on his behalf that Grosskreutz’s only regret was being too slow on the draw and not killing Rittenhouse first.

 

CNN never asked about any of this because it doesn’t fit the narrative that Rittenhouse was a white supremacist terrorist mass shooter that the Left has locked on to.

Grosskreutz was there to commit mayhem and paid the price for it.

After watching this intervew with CNN, I’m glad he’s in constant pain.

Spread the love